The best way to do Kapparot

In many communities, there is a Minhag of doing Kapparot in the eve of Yom Kippur, what is the best way to do the Kapparot, slaughtering a chicken or with money for charity?

First of all, we need to clarify that there is no Mitsva in the Tora to perform the Kapparot or any kind of animal sacrifice on the eve of Yom Kippur. In the days after the Bet HaMiqdash, as Maimonides explains, “en sham el-la teshuba,” there is nothing else but Teshuba to atone for our sins. Teshuba is a serious mental and emotional process of retrospection, which consists of the admission and confession of our flaws and bad habits, ultimately leading us to improve our behavior.

Kapparot is a practice that was initiated by the common people—not by the rabbis—at the time of the Geonim (800-1000 CE). The Kappara made with a live animal is supposed to help inspire our Teshuba. By witnessing the Shehita (slaughtering) of the chicken, we realize the extreme fragility of our lives, prompting us to do Teshuba and reflect on our own mortality. This is, by the way, the frequent explanation for the effect that the qorban, in the times of the Bet haMiqdash, had on the sinner’s consciousness.

However, soon after the custom of Kapparot became more popular, some prominent Rabbis like Ramban (Nahmanides) raised their voices against this practice. Maran Rabbi Yosef Caro (1488-1575), the author of the Shulhan Arukh, the supreme Code of Law for all Jews, explicitly disapproved of the practice of Kapparot with chickens on the eve of Yom Kippur, and he used very harsh terms. In the first edition of the Shulhan ‘Arukh (Venice 1565), it is written in the title of siman 605, where Rabbi Yosef Caro discusses Kapparot: מנהג כפרות בערב יום כפור מנהג של שטות הוא. “The custom of Kapparot on the eve of Yom Kippur is a foolish custom.” In later editions, the editors erased the last line (see the original edition of the Shulhan ‘Arukh here).

Why such opposition to the Kapparot?

First, as Nahmanides said: mishum darke haemori—”because it is similar to the practice of idol worshipers.” (Even today, many cults like Macumba, Vodoo, etc., use a small chicken as a sacrifice to their deities. You can Google, for example, “Eshu” or “Elleggua,” major idol-warriors of Santeria, who must be worshipped by sacrificing a small chicken).

Second, the fact that the Kappara performance resembles the Korbanot performance made many rabbis very concerned because slaughtering an animal as a sacrifice outside the Bet haMiqdash (haqrabat hutz) is a serious Biblical transgression. For this reason, many rabbis in the past forbade the consumption of the chicken that was slaughtered in this fashion (or intention) of a qorban. The Rishba, while still opposed to Kapparot with chickens, allowed eating the chicken, which was usually given to the poor, because it is not one of the animals that were offered as sacrifices in the Bet haMiqdash.

Third, since so many people want to do Kapparot on the eve of Yom Kippur, the Shehita might not be done with enough care and attention in terms of checking the knives and other ritual details. This is the point brought by Rabbi Obadia Yosef z”l (who in the past supported the Kapparot) to favor the performance of Kapparot with Tsedaqa (see this).

There is yet another problem, which should be of great concern when considering doing chicken Kapparot. Because of the great demand and the short time to slaughter so many animals, the chickens are too often mistreated in the process, left for days in cages without food or water. This is a serious transgression of an explicit Biblical prohibition instructing us to treat animals with respect and avoid unnecessary suffering (tsa’ar ba’ale hayim). The new Ashkenazi Chief Rabbi of Israel, Rabbi David Lau, addressed this issue last year (see here).

Lastly, if the person who does the Kappara would give the slaughtered chicken directly to a poor person, as was done in the past, then we could view this Kappara as a form of Tsedaqa. But people who perform the Kapparot often take seriously the idea of transferring their sins into the chicken, and therefore, neither they nor needy people would eat those chickens “full of sins.” Many of these chickens are not eaten but wasted. If one kills an animal unnecessarily (not to be eaten), one transgresses another explicit Biblical prohibition: bal tashchit, i.e., unnecessary waste of the blessings, in this case, an animal’s life, that God granted us.

In conclusion, the best way to do Kapparot is by giving Tsedaqa (charity for needy people). In this case, none of the above-mentioned problems would apply, and in addition, before Yom Kippur begins, you will be fulfilling the beautiful Biblical commandment of charity. This is a Mitsva with no negative side effects. On the contrary, Tsedaqa was regarded as the most important Mitsvat ‘ase, as Maimonides writes: “We have to care about the Mitsva of Tsedaqa more than [we care about] any other positive commandment” (MT, Matanot ‘Aniyim 10:1). Tsedaqa brings great zekhut (merit) to the giver and great relief to the recipient—וצדקה תציל ממות.

See this video where Rabbi Shelomo Aviner, Rosh Yeshibat Ateret Cohanim, explains the ways of doing Kapparot and mentions, among other things, that Rabbi Kaddouri z”l and Rabbi Shlomo Zalman Auerbach z”l did Kapparot with Tsedaqa instead of chicken (here).

See this video where rabbi Shelomo Aviner, Rosh Yeshibat Ateret Cohanim explains the ways of doing kapparot and mentions, among other things, that rabbi Kaddouri z”l and Rabbi Shlomo Zalman Auerbach z”l made kapparot with Tsedaqa instead of chicken.  
Redemption of Kaparot Atonement through Charity -- a Double Obligation

                                    




Leather shoes on Yom Kippur

Written in 2015

Wearing leather shoes on Yom Kippur – is it a Minhag or a strict Jewish law?

 Wearing leather shoes is one of the five prohibitions of Yom Kippur. Just as a reminder, the five prohibitions are: (1) Eating and drinking, (2) washing or (3) anointing the body, (4) having marital relations, and (5) wearing leather shoes. Wearing leather footwear is a strict prohibition connected to the verse in Vayikra 23:27 “On the 10th of Tishri you shall deprive yourself”, which means refraining from the most basic physical needs, comforts, or pleasures for a day. And not wearing leather shoes is one of these prohibitions. The Torah did not command us to be barefoot but just to avoid wearing shoes made of leather. This prohibition is the same for men and women. Moreover, unlike other Yom Kippur’s prohibitions, such as fasting, the prohibition of wearing leather shoes should also be taught to children, even when they are still not at the age of fasting.

 

If it is such an important issue, why do so many people in our community not know about it?

The Jews in Iran, or at certain times in Syria or Morocco, did not live in open and respectful societies. Jews were, in the best case, tolerated by the local population, and they had to be very discreet in what they did. It is often difficult to determine if a specific element or behavior concerning religious customs is a Minhag or a consequence of living under entirely different circumstances. For example, I had previously wondered why my grandmother, who came from a very traditional family in Syria, did not know about Tebilat Kelim (immersing the utensils in the Mikveh before using them). And I remember that when I asked her this question, she resented it, implying that if Tebilat Kelim had been such an important Mitzvah, she should have known about it. She hinted that I was trying to bring a new Minhag or new Mitzvot, etc. Later on, I discovered that in Damascus, some Jews were so poor that they never got to buy new utensils or tableware in their lifetime. They used what they had inherited from their parents, so there was never an opportunity for them to practice Tebilat Kelim. It was not because they did not know about it, but because they did not have to. Since then, I have become more cautious when classifying certain traditions. Sometimes it is a real Minhag that should be kept, and sometimes, our grandparents did not do certain things in the past because of living in a different scenario. Mr. Nassim Bassalian told me that in Iran and in many other Muslim countries, snickers or other fabric shoes were not available many years ago, and even when available, it did not look good for a respectable person to be walking with those fabric shoes. I also heard that on Tisha beAb and Yom Kippur, many people wear leather shoes to walk to Kanissah. Then, at Kanissah, they would leave the shoes outside and be inside the Synagogue barefoot, stepping on comfortable carpets. Mr. Nassim Bassalian told me that a few people in Teheran wore slippers or even socks, but most people did not know the importance of it.

 

Our circumstances today, BH, are entirely different:

1. We live in total freedom to practice our religion openly. 

2. Snickers, of all footwear, are the most common, popular, and accessible footwear.