VAYERA: A Lesson in Parenting From The First Jewish Mother

DID SARA OVERREACT?

Abraham and Sara had no children. HaShem promised them that their descendants would inherit the land of Canaan. Sarah proposes to Abraham to take Hagar as a concubine and adopt her son as his own (a kind of surrogate motherhood), and this is how Yishmael, Abraham’s first son, is born. But after a few years, Sara miraculously gets pregnant, and Yitschaq is born. HaShem tells Abraham כי ביצחק יקרא לך זרע, Gen. 21:12 “Your descendants will come from Yitschaq”, not from Yishmael. Yishmael, because he is Abraham’s son, לגדול גוי אשימנו, “will also become a powerful nation.” Now there are two boys at home. And the Tora tells us (21: 9) what Sara witnessed: “And Sara saw that the son of Hagar the Egyptian [Yishmael]… was having fun / was playing [with Yitschaq]. And she said to Abraham: Send this woman and her son away! … “. What happened here? Why did Sara ask to send Yishmael away? Just because he was “playing” with Yitschaq?Did Sara overreact?

HUNGER GAMES

It all comes down to the meaning of the word מצחק “having fun, playing games with”. What is the nature of the “games” that the text describes here? There are a few opinions. According to a first opinion, Yishmael played “bow and arrow” with Yitschaq, William Tell’s style. Sara saw Yishmael, a young adult, “practicing” with her little boy, and she got terrified. Sara understood that Yishmael was, consciously or not, dangerously jealous of Yitschaq and decided to expel him. There is a second interpretation, according to which Yishmael’s games did not threaten Yitschaq’s physical integrity but his moral character. The young Yishmael was not playing with Legos or racing cars. Yishmael, a teenager with testosterone, played games that the Midrash describes as: “Idolatry, promiscuity, and murder.”

NON-VIRTUAL REALITY

Let’s start with the end. Think about those modern video games. A child earns points for killing people while driving a car, shooting and killing bystanders, “eating an opponent’s head, pulling out their stomach after spitting acid down their throat and slicing them in half with a saw” (see here). I don’t know what was the equivalent of Mortal Kombat in those days, but Sara had a very compelling argument about protecting Yitschaq’s character development. Yitschaq, the first Jewish child and the paradigm of EVERY Jewish child, was destined to follow and continue the path of Abraham, the kindest man on earth. As a wise mother, Sara saw that the power of the influence of Yishmael, a young man with a very violent personality, as we will later see, would cause irreversible damage to Yitschaq’s values and personality. Sara also understood that even if she got Yishmael’s mom to rebuke her son once or twice, he would not change. Why? Because Hagar, Yishmael’s biological mother, did not share Sara’s concern. She was OK with her son’s character. How do we know this?

ILLUMINATING MIDRASHIM

Once again, we need the Midrash. Some Hakhamim said that when Sara asked Hagar about Yishmael’s violent behavior, Hagar calmly replied: “metsacheq”, “Don’t worry, he is just playing”, in other words: “These are just children’s games! Don’t take this seriously”.

Hagar reminds us of that permissive mother who, out of naivety (or comfort) chooses not to get too involved with her children’s games, friends, and influences. She thinks, “my son is just having fun, playing with other children”. Similarly, Hagar was probably not bothered by Yishmael’s promiscuous games (who knows what those games were.) or by Aboda Zara. She probably did not care about what Abraham was trying to change in the world. Hagar’s educational philosophy was opposite to Sara’s: Sara wanted to INSTILL in Yitschaq principles and values, whereas Hagar felt that Yishmael would choose his pathway in life when he grew up. Thanks to these Midrashim, our perspective of Sara’s “drastic” decision is a little broader. We can appreciate that Sara felt the power of bad influences and understood that Hagar did not share her concerns.

IN THE END, THEY ARE ALWAYS RIGHT …

And in the end, we see that Sara’s concerns about Yishmael proved correct. Yishmael did not become a man of God like his father, Abraham.

Neither a merchant nor a farmer. In pasuq 21:20 we see the final destination of Yishmael ויהי רובה קשת; he became an archer, a hunter of animals, and perhaps also a warrior, a hunter of people. Yishmael became as an adult, what he played as a teenager.

We have a lot to thank and to learn from Sara.

Among other things,

1. Knowing that bad company, bad friends, and violent or promiscuous games exert more influence on our children than the words and verbal lessons we parents impart to them. 

2. The games our children play in their childhood, which they absorb at a tender age, will probably become part of their adult personality. (גרסא דינקותא לא זזה ממקומה)

3. And finally, sometimes we must take drastic measures to protect our children’s minds, innocence, and values. We must educate them as true descendants of Abraham Abinu and Sara Imenu.




Noah and the Seven Commandments

THE GENERATION OF THE FLOOD

When God created humanity, He endowed them with a neshamá—the soul, intelligence, the capacity to think, and the freedom to choose. These faculties were described in the biblical text as being “in the image and likeness of God.” Humanity was not created as just another part of nature but as a supernatural being with the potential to choose between good and evil, to follow the Creator’s guidance, or to be swayed by earthly, insatiable desires.

Ten generations after creation, humanity, as a whole, chose the path of evil. Corruption and violence became normalized in that generation. The powerful—those who should have used their ability and power to lead, organize, and inspire—exploited their leadership for personal gain and to oppress the weak. The prevailing rule was “the survival of the fittest,” where the strong devoured the weak. Corruption is contagious, and human society degraded itself, sacrificing its divine image. Humanity transformed into an intelligent predator, driven solely by the satisfaction of animalistic instincts. This generation is known as Dor haMabbul, the generation deemed deserving of being wiped from the earth by the Flood.

One man, Noah, proved to be an exception to this rule. Compared to the rest of the world—or, according to another view, despite the widespread corruption—Noah conducted himself with integrity, living with an awareness of God’s existence, something that had become obsolete for the rest of humankind.

God saves Noah and grants humanity a second chance. Noah builds the ark, and he, his wife, his three sons, and their wives—a total of eight people—along with the animals, survive the devastating Flood.

THE FIRST LAW

After leaving the ark, God blesses Noah, urging him to be fruitful, multiply, and repopulate the earth. He presents a set of fundamental laws to educate humanity and prevent its moral decline. The first law pertains to animals. God permits Noah and his descendants to kill animals and consume their flesh (Genesis 9:3), something that was previously forbidden, as God had instructed Adam and Eve to consume only plants: seeds, vegetables, and fruits. Now, God allows humanity to take the lives of animals. This law reflects humanity’s new status: having once been the protector of the animal kingdom, humans would now be the predator at the top of the food chain.

Nevertheless, or perhaps because of this, God imposes one limitation to preserve, in some way, their humanity in this area: humans cannot mutilate a living animal and consume its flesh, as carnivorous predators do with live prey. Before consuming an animal’s flesh, it must first be sacrificed. This law is known in Hebrew as eber min hachay (prohibition against eating from a living animal).

THE SECOND LAW

The second law God commands Noah also pertains to killing, but this time about another human being. This law is formulated differently than the “You shall not kill” of the Ten Commandments and states: “Whoever sheds the blood of a man, by man shall his blood be shed; for in the image of God has God made mankind” (Genesis 9:6). This law establishes capital punishment for the crime of murder. It is formulated primarily to prevent the impunity that characterized the previous generation’s widespread corruption. Here, it will not be God who enforces justice but humans themselves, who are tasked with punishing abuse and establishing that, regardless of position or wealth, every human being deserves respect, having been created in the image and likeness of God.

 

THE COVENANT BETWEEN GOD AND NOAH

In a sense, God entrusts humanity with the responsibility of enforcing punishment where it is due, which is why one of the seven Noahide laws—though not explicitly written—is the obligation to establish courts of justice that apply the law and punish criminals. For His part, God promises never to bring another flood or universal catastrophe to destroy humanity. The rainbow will serve as a reminder that the rain will eventually cease and that God will not erase humanity from the face of the earth.

These three basic laws are the foundation of what is known as the Seven Laws of Noah: 1. Do not murder. 2. Do not eat meat from a living animal. 3. Prohibition of idolatry, 4. Blasphemy, 5. Theft, and 6. Incest. 7. The obligation to establish courts of justice that will prevent impunity.




Noach, and the Discovery of Mortality

PREDILUVIAN THOUGHTS 

What caused the universal flood? A meteorite? A climate change event? The Tora is not an ordinary book: it is a Divine book. And as such, it demands an unconventional reading. This type of reading implies, among other things, reading the silences of the text, reading between its lines, and, particularly, knowing that nothing is there unnecessarily.

In the fifth chapter of Bereshit (Genesis) in last week’s Parasha, we read the first human genealogy: a seemingly unnecessary list of the years that each of the descendants of Adam, the first man, lived. The Tora mentions nine generations: Adam, Seth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalalel, Yared, Hanokh, Metushelach, and Lemekh, Noach’s father. All lived a long life. The longevity record (so far …) is Metushelach’s, who lived 969 years.

The question remains: What does this lifespan registry teach us beyond satisfying our curiosity? Why do we need so much detail about the age of the first humans?

THE DEATH OF THE FIRST MORTAL

If we look carefully, we will discover something astonishing.

An extraordinary event took place in the year 930, counting from Creation. Adam, the first man, died. Humans, the thousands or hundreds of thousands of descendants of Adam, already knew that a human being could be “killed”, or die accidentally, like Abel. But now, seemingly for the first time, humans see death as inevitable. Men have discovered “natural” death. 

HaShem had already told Adam that he would not live forever. But that warning took more than nine centuries to materialize—enough time for humans to forget about mortality. Given their advanced age, Adam, Set, Enosh, etc., were seen as immortal. The natural death of Adam was an unprecedented event and provoked a state of shock and especially panic. The only thing that could alleviate this fear, the terrifying fear of death, was to assume that mortality would only affect Adam for having disobeyed God by eating the forbidden fruit.

HANOKH IS NO LONGER WITH US..

But in the year 987 (you have to calculate the years by yourself because this calculation is not explicit in the Tora!) the second natural death is recorded: Hanokh dies at the tender age of 365 years. This second death, which was not caused by accident, could no longer be attributed to disobedience. The Tora explicitly states that Hanokh was a righteous man who walked on the Divine Path (Gen. 5:24)… Hanokh’s death was an even more shattering event. The Tora describes the death of Hanokh with words that seem to reflect the widespread surprise, terror, and innocence of the men of that generation, coping with an event they did not quite understand. “Passing away” of natural death was so novel that men could not define it with conventional words. The text does not say that Hanokh “died”. Reproducing with exquisite sensitivity the feeling of awe of primitive men, the Tora copies their words that sound like the words we use to describe death to a child: “Hanokh is no longer with us because God took him.”

VIOLENCE AS A RESPONSE TO DEATH 

The third natural death was that of Set, the son of Adam. This traumatic event took place a few years later: in 1042. Now death is a fact. And it is here to stay.

Humanity’s reaction to the inevitability of death is seemingly described at the end of the last Parasha, and it is not very positive. This new awareness of mortality caused a panic that revealed the worst of the human race, like one of those Hollywood situations when people react with violence and desperation when learning about the imminent falling of a meteorite that will destroy the earth. When the men of that generation saw that they would die, no matter what, they focused on satisfying their material instincts as much as they could before dying. As Yesha’ayahu (22:13) said, quoting the philosophy of men with no Tora: אכול ושתה, כי מחר נמות, “Let us eat and drink [as much as we can], since tomorrow [anyways] we are going to die”.   

In addition, once humankind sees life as inevitably limited, it loses its sacred status for them. Their reasoning was: why should I not kill my neighbor if he is going to die anyways? Respect for other people’s life was now lost. Theft, rape, and murder (in biblical Hebrew, “hamas”) got normalized. A phrase in the text of the Tora reveals something about that new human condition: “And the powerful men saw the women [of other families, tribes. etc.] and took [by force] all they wanted.” Our rabbis added that the generation before the flood was guilty of sexual violence, corruption, oppression of the weak, widespread crime, and especially lack of law, order, and justice.

RESETTING HUMANKIND 

The Creator then decides to do two things in this situation: 1. Shortening human life. Something that, as we will see, will happen gradually. Ten generations after Noah’s lifespan reaches merely 150- 200 years, and in subsequent generations, it continues to decline. A shorter lifespan might help humankind better understand mortality and the need to live a purposeful life. 2. God also brings the flood to do a “reset” of human civilization.

Now we understand that for the Tora, what caused the flood was not a meteorite or climate change: it was that state of anarchy, chaos, and corruption of men reacting violently to the discovery of their inevitable mortality.

Noah, the protagonist of our Parasha, was born in 1056. He is the first man recorded to be born in a world of men aware of their mortality. At the end of the flood, Noach received the first code of laws condemning homicide, robbery, promiscuity, etc., and commanding the establishment of courts of justice to avoid anarchy and impunity. All this will bring a new climate of law and order.

But we will have to wait for another ten generations for another man, Abraham Abinu —and his descendants— to make a second discovery. 

1. Although limited and relatively short, life is the opportunity God gives us to get close to Him by our own choice and effort. 

2. We were not in this world to exploit our neighbor but to assist him, helping each other. “”The best way to find yourself is to lose yourself in the service of others.”. 

3. And finally, that mortality affects man’s body. But our Divine spirit, the neshama, survives if we dedicate ourselves to nurturing it. 




BERESHIT: Dinosaurs in the Bible

BACK TO THE BEGINNING

This year,  Parashat Bereshit, Genesis, which contains the account of the creation of the world, left us with only one day to study it—this past Shabbat—so before saying goodbye to Bereshit until next year, I want to share with you a brief reflection on something new we can learn from this Parasha. About ten years ago, I published my book “Awesome Creation”, where I explained the story of the world’s creation based on a faithful reading of the Hebrew Bible. I showed that when this literal reading (peshat) is ignored—voluntarily or involuntarily—many critical aspects of Emuná (Jewish faith) are affected, and the Tora can be discredited, reducing it to the level of fables or, God forbid, a irrelevant text. Today, I will mention an example of a topic I have not yet published. This example, I believe, deserves the first prize for ignorance of biblical Hebrew and its unexpected consequences.

THE FIRST ANIMALS

The initial chapter of Bereshit (Genesis) mentions the creation of the first animals that appeared on our planet on the fifth day. The Hebrew text says: וַיִּבְרָ֣א אֱלֹקים אֶת־הַתַּנִּינִ֙ם֙ הַגְּדֹלִ֔ים וְאֵ֣ת כָּל־נֶ֣פֶשׁ הַֽחַיָּ֗ה הָֽרֹמֶשֶׂת֙

“And God created the  taninim gedolim and all [other] living creatures….”

What were the taninim gedolim?

Let’s begin with the first word. Tanin (singular of taninim) appears about 15 times in the Tanakh and describes a group of animals, including crocodiles, lizards, snakes, and vipers. In other words, in biblical Hebrew, tanin means “reptile.” The next word, gedolim, plural of gadol, does not necessarily mean “large” in size. Depending on the context, it can also mean “terrible,” “fearsome,” or “powerful.” In my book, I mention several examples of this connotation, such as when God punishes Pharaoh for taking Abraham’s wife. It says nega’im gedolim (Genesis 12:17), translated as “terrible” plagues or diseases. In our context, the best translation of the word gedolim, which expresses both size and the fear these animals inspired, could be “imposing or giant.”

Therefore, taninim gedolim should be translated as “great/giant reptiles,” but inexplicably, this translation almost doesn’t exist!

THE CONSEQUENCES OF IGNORANCE

Let’s look, for example, at a classic non-Jewish translation, the New American Standard Bible  from 1995

”God created the great sea monsters and every living creature”

Why translate taninim as “sea monsters,” two words that don’t appear in the original Hebrew text?

First, let’s clarify that in biblical Hebrew, the word “monster” does not exist (Note 1), simply because the Tora does not believe in monsters,  despite the fact that  ALL ancient civilizations believed in monsters and mentioned them regularly in their creation myths (see, for example, here: Tiamat). That’s is the reason why a translation that renders taninim as “monsters” instead of “reptiles” should be considered tendentious and even offensive, as it—voluntarily or involuntarily—equates the Tora with pagan mythological legends.

So, how should the expression taninim gedolim be translated?

IN GREEK AND HEBREW

Richard Owen (1804–1892) was a renowned British scientist and paleontologist known for his work in classifying fossil remains of prehistoric animals. In 1842, he coined the term dinosaur to describe a group of huge extinct reptiles. This term, dinosaur, is a combination of two words of Greek origin: deinos, which means gigantic, powerful, imposing, or fearsome (similar semantic field of gedolim) , and saurus, which means lizard or reptile. Thus, the term dinosaur means “the gigantic reptiles” of ancient times, the exact words that the Tora uses to describe the first creatures created by God on the fifth day!

MONSTERS OR MONSTROSITIES?

The word “monsters” found its way in the Bibles’s translations possibly from non-Jewish commentaries written before Owen classified these fossils as “dinosaurs.” Pagan cultures assumed that those giant fossils that appeared everywhere in the world, belonged to monsters or dragons, imaginary beings worthy of pagan mythology. This would explain why the word “monster” was used in the Middle Ages. But to translate taninim gedolim as “sea monsters” in the 20th or 21st century (Note 2) is unforgivable because it forces a mythological reading of the Tora and takes away its incredible historical credibility.

The translation of taninim gedolim as “dinosaurs”—or at least as “great reptiles”—should be the most literal translation, and a testimony that the Tora was the FIRST and ONLY ancient book that records the existence of these prehistoric creatures—the first animals created by God on earth—without legends or fictions worthy of Harry Potter.

Note 1: The word mifletzet, used in modern Hebrew for “monster,” describes a totem of pagan peoples, like pesilim, see Jeremiah 50:38.

Note 2: The word “sea” also does not appear in the text, which, by the way, does NOT describe only animals that inhabit the sea!




SHOFETIM: Children and Bamboo Trees

כי האדם עץ השדה

Debarim 20:19

Towards the end of this week’s Parasha, the Tora addresses the laws of war and teaches the Jewish soldier to behave with respect and dignity, even on the battlefield. One of the most notable details refers to not destroying the city or the fields without reason. Trees are specifically mentioned, suggesting they should not be seen and attacked as “the enemy.” The unusual language used by the Tora on this occasion lends itself to metaphorical interpretations that arise when comparing men and trees.

Today I would like to extend this comparison to the area of our children’s education (parenting) and reflect on the inexhaustible patience that this task demands.

At times, our children seem to stagnate, not maturing at the pace we hoped for. This concern intensifies when they have brothers or sisters who do seem to progress. Parents sometimes do not understand the influence of time on the development of our children and find themselves caught up in worries, suffering unnecessary tensions. We forget what an expert once mentioned: that most of the behavioral problems of children are resolved over time.

I remember certain students from our Talmud Torah: in fifth and sixth grade, they were a constant challenge. Restless, they kept talking and interrupting. They bothered their peers, disobeyed the teachers, and often the only solution was to send them out of the classroom. They spent more time with the principal than with their classmates. But, over time, after 15 years or more, I have seen many of these “unbearable” children transform into exemplary parents, successful entrepreneurs, brilliant professionals, or people with admirable religious discipline.

What happened?

They were maturing at their own pace or, as neurologists say, “the brain needed time to build and strengthen the connections between its areas and hemispheres”.

Having patience does not mean that we parents will sit around waiting —and praying— for our children to mature. It is essential that we are always there to talk, guide, and encourage our children. We must never stop doing it.

To better understand the growth process many of our children go through and understand our role as parents in this process, I would like to share with you the story of the growth of the bamboo tree.

Initially, it is essential to prepare the soil, choose an optimal location with enough light and moisture. Then one sows the seeds. During the first year, the soil with the seeds is constantly watered, but nothing visible happens. In the second year, it is watered and fertilized, but still, not a single shoot sprouts. The third year continues watering and taking care of the area, hoping to see some change, but there are still no signs of bamboo. In the fourth year, you look at the ground and see no progress. The fifth-year comes, and, seeing no results, one might think they have failed in their attempt to grow bamboo. However, surprisingly, in the middle of that year, the bamboo starts to grow rapidly and, in just six months, reaches an impressive height of up to 30 meters!

The million-dollar question is: How long did it take the bamboo to grow? The immediate answer seems to be “six months”. But in reality, it took the bamboo five and a half years to grow. That is, to break through the ground, literally, and begin to grow. And once it started, nothing can stop it.

It should also be noted that, although the progress was not noticeable, during those five and a half years, the bamboo was growing downwards: it was forming a robust root system capable of supporting its great size.

Our children often experience a process similar to bamboo. Their growth requires constant care, “even if the results are not noticeable”, with inexhaustible patience. Remember the bamboo: if, during the first five years, one had given up and stopped watering or protecting the bamboo, that tree would never have emerged.

Every word of encouragement we give them, even in their moments of rebellion or immaturity, is uplifting. They are like water to the bamboo. Our children grow and develop in ways we don’t see. We don’t know when that internal growth will begin to manifest outwardly and reach surprising heights, sometimes even surpassing their siblings, who seemed to develop more quickly.

Like bamboo trees, our children need us to nurture them with love and care constantly.

Over time, and with divine help, they will mature and flourish.

Rabbi Yosef Bitton




SHOFETIM: Kings, with limited powers

One of the main issues discussed in our Parasha is the role of the “king” of Israel. Unlike other monarchies around the world, for the Jewish people, the king was not the central figure. The Tora seems to “tolerate” the people’s desire to have a king but does not prescribe it as the ideal situation for the People of God. We see this reflected in the book of Shemuel, chapter 8:7, when God tells Samuel that the people are asking for a king because “they have rejected Me…”.

The Jewish king must maintain a low profile, which is in complete contrast to gentile kings who imposed their superiority on their subjects to earn respect. Gentile kings viewed themselves—and behaved—as “gods.” Egypt had many gods, but Pharaoh was considered above all of them. As Yechezqel (29:3) says of the Egyptian monarch: “The Great Crocodile [as Pharaoh referred to himself], who says: mine is the Nile River [also a supreme divinity in Egypt] and I created myself.” A similar situation existed with Roman kings and emperors, like Caligula, who presented himself as a god, even in the Roman Senate. In the Middle Ages, kings were not much different. They may not have claimed to be gods, but they often considered themselves the “spokesperson” of their gods, which made their decisions—no matter how immoral or arbitrary—seem divinely sanctioned and infallible (as is still the case with the Pope today). Gentile kings, in general, were above the law and not accountable to any higher authority because there was none. Obeying the king was seen as obeying God. This allowed countless abuses and atrocities to be committed by kings in the name of their gods. The Tora, however, is unique in this respect—absolutely revolutionary.

Our Parasha describes three unique characteristics of the king of Israel:

  1. The king of Israel has limitations. He cannot accumulate wealth, meaning he could not justify charging excessive taxes from the people. The Jewish king couldn’t have too many horses, so he would not build a more powerful army than necessary. He also couldn’t have too many wives, which, among other things, limited his ability to form alliances with neighboring gentile peoples (Debarim 17:16-17).
  2. The king of Israel had to be a talmid hakham, meaning a Tora scholar. He was required to write a Sefer Tora, or at least the book of Debarim (17:18), and carry it with him wherever he went, ensuring that he would always remember to remain faithful to the Divine law. The king of Israel had to study the Tora “all the days of his life” (17:19) to understand everything that HaShem expects of him and of each of his subjects. This study was not meant to show off his wisdom to nobles or commoners, but to improve his behavior and refine his character, as we will see below.
  3. Perhaps the most defining characteristic of the Jewish king was that he must behave with humility, in complete opposition to gentile kings—and even some contemporary presidents. The Tora explicitly states in Debarim 17:20: “[The king will have to read the Tora…] so that his heart does not exalt itself above his brothers and does not turn from the commandments to the right or to the left.” The key lesson of this verse is that the Tora does not say the king should not exalt himself above “his subjects,” but above his “brothers.” Why? Because in the Jewish people, the relationship between the king and his people was not vertical but horizontal. It was not “king/subjects” but “elder brother/brothers.” While in other nations the king was an exception to the law—free to change it at will due to his status as the spokesman for the gods—the king of Israel was the first to declare his submission to the law. In the Jewish nation, the king is not the “central figure” because the law does not depend on his authority. That is why the Tora does not include any specific mitzva to obey the human king: both the kings and the people of Israel are equally bound to obey the same law—the Tora.

The following sentence summarizes the key difference between the Jewish king and gentile kings:

While in other nations the king is god, for Israel, God is the King.

Shabbat Shalom!

Shabbat Shalom!



PERASHAT REE: ¿How does HaShem open your hand?

There is a very well known pasuq (verse) in Tehiim. We say every day of the year, three times per day. And this pasuq has a particularity. It must be said with kavana, that is, thinking about what we are saying. To the point that if you did not recite this verse paying attention to its meaning, you should say it again. This verse is found in Tehila leDavid (ashré …), Psalm 145. Pasuq, 145: 16, reads: “poteakh et yadekha …”. The conventional translation is: “You open Your hand and satisfy all creatures according to their will” (or as per Rashi, “… according to Your will”). Either way, the traditional explanation is that this pasuq speaks of “the hands of God,” which is obviously a metaphor. And it means that in due time (be’itó) the Creator “opens His hands” and grants His blessing, providing food for all living things. HaShem has designed a miraculous, highly sophisticated mechanism, which scientists call “ecology” or “food chain”, through which food is assigned to all living creatures. It is no wonder then, that this pasuq should be read carefully, to reinforce our belief that our livelihood depends on the will of God as well.
As we all know, the Tora allows (or requires us) multiple interpretations. There are literal interpretations (peshat) and non-literal interpretations (derash). The difference is that while non literal readings could be expressed with a wide linguistic license, literal interpretations must fit the standard semantics of the Hebrew language. And usually, while non-literal interpretations are often very abundant and diverse, the literal meaning is reduced, usually, only to one possible reading.
Our pasuq in Tehilim is an exception to this rule. As it lends itself to an alternative (perhaps complementary) reading that adheres strictly to the literal sense of its words. How can that be? In Hebrew, verbs in the present tense are identical for the first, second and third person in singular. In Hebrew, “I write, you write or he writes,” is said in the same way “KOTEB”.
Now, the first word of this verse, POTEAH, is usually read: “[You, HaShem,] open Your hand and satisfy all creatures according to their will.” But the first three words in Hebrew can also be read in a different way, without violating the literal sense; “[HaShem] opens your hand, and satisfy all creatures according to their will.” In this second reading The Creator does not open His hand, He opens “our hands”, human hands, to satisfy all creatures.
According to this second reading, HaShem somehow opens our hands to help those who do not have what to eat and satisfy the hunger of others.
But, how is it that God opens our hands?
The answer is found in the Tora portion of this week, Re-e. In Chapter 15:7 the Tora speaks about the Mitsva of Tsedaqa. God asks us not to close our hand when our brothers needs help (לא תקפוץ את ידך מאחיך האביון). And in the next pasuq 15: 8, the Tora uses words that is impossible not to associate with our pasuq of Tehilim. Debarim 15: 8, says: “Rather, you must open your hand   [to your needy brother] and provide him all that he lacks”. In Hebrew” patoah tiftah et yedekhá it (פתוח תפתח את ידך לו) “.
According to this interpretation, God opens our hands through the Mitsva of Tsedaqá,  and by opening our hands, He grants each person what they need.
Thus, through  Tsedaqá, we become an instrument of God. We are part of this Divine Ecology, a human chain of hesed that HaShem established to give everyone what they need.
According to this interpretation, when we open our hands and say POTEAH ET YADEKHA, we are not thinking only of what our hands will receive. Rather, we focus on what our hands are going to give.
Shabbat Shalom!

 




REE: The Human Food Chain

מצות עשה ליתן צדקה לעניי ישראל כפי מה שראוי לעני, אם הייתה יד הנותן משגת–שנאמר  פתוח תפתח את ידך
 

~ Open your hands and satisfy all creatures according to Your will ~

There is a well known verse of Tehillim (Psalms) which we say three times a day.
This pasuq contains a particularity; it must be said with kavana- we must pay attention to the meaning, and internalize the message within it. Found in psalm 145, Tehila LeDavid (Ashre’), it is the 16th pasuq and reads, “Poteach ‘et yadecha, Umasbia lekhol chai ratson…” The conventional translation is: [You, HaShem,] Open Your hands, and satisfy all creatures according to Your will.” It seems to be that the pasuq here is referring to the hands of God- an obvious metaphor- and indicates that our Creator permanently “opens His hands,” providing the food and sustenance which all living beings need.
Within the animal kingdom, HaShem designed a highly sophisticated, miraculous mechanism. Scientists like to refer to it as the “food chain.” This ecological mechanism allows each creature of the forest, jungle, and sea alike, to have what to eat.

Similar to the other living creators, human beings also find our sustenance within plants and other animals. But there is one particular element corresponding exclusively to the human race; those who have food, or those who have extra; feed those who do not have food, or those who have less.
Not only do we not eat eachother, but we also have the capacity, which no other living being has, for solidarity and altruism.
So, returning to our verse, what role does our Creator play in the human food chain?

As we know, the Tora in its overall Text allows us (or rather, requires us) to multiple interpretations. There are literal interpretations (peshat), and non literal ones (derash). In this case, we will obtain an interpretation strictly conforming to the literal meaning of the Text that will provide us with an answer to our question.
In Hebrew vocabulary, verbs in the present tense are issued in the same form for first, second, or third person- singular. For example, “I write,” “you write,” or “he writes” are all translated into Hebrew as, “koteb.” In our case, the first word of our verse, “poteach,” can then be read as we did previously “[You, HaShem,] open Your hands and satisfy all creatures according to Your will.”
However, the first three words of this verse can be given a different interpretation, without violating its literal meaning. Let me suggest an alternate translation: “[HaShem] opens your (the readers) hand, and thus satisfies all creators according to His will.”
In this second reading, using “poteach,” as a transitive verb, the Creator opens our hands to satisfy the hunger of other human beings. HaShem opens our hands to help those who do not have what to eat.

How does God open our hands?
The answer is found in this week’s Perasha, Re-e. In 15:7, the Text mentions the misva of Tsedaqa. HaShem asks us not to close our hands when our fellow Israelite is in need, “לא תקפוץ את ידך מאחיך האביון.” And the words used in the next verse, 15:8, are impossible to not associate with our verse in Tehillim.
The eighth pasuq reads, “For you must open your hand… [to your brother in need] and you will provide him with all that he needs” (פתוח תפתח את ידך לו). According to our interpretation, HaShem is opening our hands through the misva of Tsedaqa; and by opening our hands, grants each person with the food that they need.
Through the misva of tzedaqa, we become an instrument of God in part of the human-chain. The chain of hessed, that HaShem has implemented through our hands so everyone has what to eat…
And thus, His will is fulfilled.
Shabbat Shalom.




VAETCHANAN: The Perils Of Inherited Wealth

“When HaShem your God brings you to the land that He promised to your parents Abraham, Isaac and Jacob … you will inherit lands with great cities that you did not build; with houses full of all kinds of good things, that you did not work for them; with wells of water that you did not dig and with vines and olive groves that you did not plant, so when you eat and feel [comfortable and] satisfied, be careful not to forget HaShem, your God, who took out of Egypt, the house bondage! “
Deut. 6: 10-12
The people of Israel are getting ready to enter the Promised Land. They will have to fight to conquer it, but HaShem promised them that He will join them in the battlefield. On the military plane, thus, success is guaranteed. “With the help of God”, literally, they will conquer the land of Israel. In speaking to the people, Moshe is not concerned with war but with peace. And more specifically for the side effects of prosperity in times of peace.
The land they are going to be given is fully functional. Jews will not be forced to spend the next few years working hard to build their cities, their walls, their houses and sow their fields. After conquering the land they will “inherit” cities that are fully operative; wells and cisterns filled with water; fields with grain ready to be collected, and trees and vineyards bearing fruit. But this, which seems to be the fulfillment of every a man’s greatest dream, can become a trap from a spiritual or psychological point of view. The Tora warns the people of Israel against the phenomenon that some call “affluenza”.
On June 15, 2013, 16 years old Ethan Couch, killed four people while driving intoxicated. He was indicted on four counts of manslaughter. But was not sent to prison. Instead, the Judge sentenced him to 10 years of probation and therapy after this attorney argued that Couch suffered from “affluenza”, that is to say, he didn’t know boundaries because his rich parents didn’t set any, and he therefore needed rehabilitation instead of prison (this is , by the way, a great example of what Theodore Dalrymple mentions in his book: “Admirable Evasions, how psychology undermines morality”. Thanks to Dr Sauly Harari for getting me this great book!).
Those who are most exposed to contract affluenza are people who have everything they want “by inheritance.” These privileged individuals did not need to earn their money by working hard. The great effort was made by their parents. And many parents (wrongly) believe that allowing their children to enjoy material abundance without doing enough to deserve it, is good for their children. Parents innocently think that privileged children will always display great appreciation to their benefactors, and be eternally grateful to them. What’s more: many parents think that since their children have received so much, and know the great feeling of being the recipient of an abundance of blessings, they will be naturally inclined to be generous, considerate and magnanimous with others, imitating what their parents did for them.
But it often happens that, far from grateful, kind and considerate, by “giving them everything they want without demanding efforts from them” parents accomplished the exact opposite effect: their children become spoiled; do not appreciate or value what they receive because they tend to take everything for granted, and become selfish and self centered. Moreover: many children that get used to receiving everything effort-free, do not feel any need “to give” back or redistribute their privileges with others. Rather, they are always expecting to receive more. And behave as if the entire world is there to please them, like their parents did.
This was Moshe Rabbenu’s greatest fear. He worried that something similar could happen to the people of Israel with the inheritance that God is giving them for free. They might be affected by “affluenza” and become selfish, demanding, spoiled and ungrateful. And this is why he warns us: Beware of the effects of wealth, especially inherited wealth. Never forget “WHO” gave you everything you have.
The Tora expects us to do at least these two things to protect us from affluenza:
First, that we learn to value what we have, and express our appreciation permanently. So, for example, every time we enjoy or eat something we bless (= acknowledge) God before we benefit from it. And, every time we finish eating a meal we express our thanks to God, out loud and in an elaborate prayer called “Birkat haMazon.” These Mitzvot / gestures will keep our sense of appreciation awake and alert.
Second, beyond appreciation, HaShem also demands us to behave as He behaves. He has instructed us to “imitate His generosity” by sharing the gifts we received from Him with those who have less than us.
And when we give to others and share our blessings, we naturally learn to appreciate more what we have received and inherited from Him.



VAETCHANAN: The Jewish Pledge Of Allegiance

This week’s Parasha, Va’etchanan, contains two cardinal texts of the Jewish faith: the Ten Commandments and the first part of the Shema Israel. Today, we will briefly analyze the Shema’s first verse. (To learn more about the Ten Commandments, consult the link below.)

To begin with, let us remember that the Shema Israel is not formally a prayer. It is not a text in which we praise God or ask for His help. The Shema we recite daily contains our declaration of faith in God’s existence and unGod, educates us to love God, urges us to fulfill His commandments, and exhorts us to behave with morality and decency.

HOW DO YOU SAY “GOD EXISTS” IN HEBREW?

The first verse of the Shema Israel contains the three ideas that constitute the principles of our faith:

שמע ישראל ה אלוקינו ה אחד

“Hear, O Israel, HaShem is our God, HaShem is one.”

  • That God exists.
  • That we are the only witnesses of His revelation.
  • That God is one.

Ironically, the most significant word in this theme is not explicitly written in the verse (biblical verse). Our verse literally says, “Hear, O Israel, HaShem our God, HaShem one.” But the correct translation is: “Hear, O Israel, HaShem IS our God, HaShem IS one.” Why are these two verbs not explicitly included in this verse? Because in biblical Hebrew, verbs are not conjugated in the present tense like in other languages. To indicate the present, Hebrew uses only the pronoun and the noun. When I say, for example, ANI QORE, which is generally translated as “I read,” I am actually saying, “At this moment, ‘I am’ a reader.” That is why when one wants to say the verb “to be” in the present, “is,” or “am,” nothing is said! If I want to say, “This chair IS white,” I will say, “hakisé laban” = “The chair… white.” And when I want to say “HaShem IS our God,” I will say “HaShem… our God.”

Ironically, the idea of “BEING” that is hidden between the word “HaShem” and the word “our” conveys the main message of the entire Shema Israel: the affirmation that God “IS,” that is, that God “EXISTS,” which constitutes the number one principle of the Jewish faith.

HOW DO WE KNOW THAT GOD EXISTS?

The answer to this question is presented in the second part of this verse: “HaShem is ‘our God‘.” Here, the emphasis is not on the word “is but on the word “our.”

In Judaism, belief in God is based, first and foremost, on the fact that Jews are the only witnesses of Divine Revelation (אתם עדי). At Mount Sinai, when God chose us among all the nations and gave us His Torah, He revealed Himself to our ancestors, transmitting the first two commandments. The Divine revelation did not manifest through images. In fact, the Tora seriously warns us against creating imaginary visual images of Divine revelation, as other religions do. God’s revelation (in Hebrew: ma’amad har Sinai) is described thus: “and all the people saw the voices [that came from God]. The Torah uses exceptional language, “seeing the voices, to indicate an extrasensory, supernatural event, a kind of prophetic telepathy. This “shocking (even “traumatic”) event was imprinted in our genetic memory, and we thus became the only human group to have directly and collectively experienced Divine Revelation. Rabbi Yehuda haLevi mentioned about 1,000 years ago that other religions have not even falsely claimed to have experienced a collective revelation, a myth impossible to sustain. Gentile religions claim, instead, supposed “private revelations to individuals like Yeshu, Muhammad, or Joseph Smith.

Now we can better understand the second message of the Shema Israel: “HaShem is OUR God. God revealed Himself to us, the entire people of Israel, and this experience of divine revelation has transformed us to this day into the privileged witnesses of His existence.

Of course, we must develop this genetic faith by seeking a more personal knowledge of God, which is increased through studying His Torah and observing and admiring His creation. Both “books—the Torah and Creation—reveal a Wisdom that is not human and thus direct our minds and hearts towards a deeper recognition of the Author/Creator of both works.

WHAT DOES IT MEAN THAT GOD IS ONE?

Jewish monotheism, the belief that there is only one God and that there is no other power independent of Him, is probably the most revolutionary idea of the Torah. Why? Because monotheism was a totally counter-intuitive idea. Let us see. For ancient man, it was impossible to think that there was only one God. Human beings naturally perceive reality in terms of conflicting and opposing events: life and death, war and peace, joy and pain, etc. For the pagan mind, it was impossible to conceive that the complex spectrum of this reality comes from just one God! The most normal, intuitive, and logical conclusion is that the world is governed by multiple gods, each in charge of a particular power: this is the god of good and the god of evil, the god of light and the god of darkness. And those gods are in permanent conflict and fight against each other to overcome one another. From a psychological perspective, polytheism is also the most natural way of projecting the most violent aspects of human reality: the gods possess the same conflicts, interests, and appetites as the human beings who fight each other to impose themselves on one another.

Conceiving ONE GOD from whom all the contradictory and opposing aspects of our complex human reality derive is revolutionary and almost “insane.”

It may be difficult for us to perceive today the magnitude and incredible impact of monotheism on humanity simply because most of the civilized world has rejected polytheism and adopted the principle established in Shema Israel.

To summarize: The first verse of the Shema Israel is not a prayer that we recite to God. It is a biblical text directed towards us (Hear, O Israel). It reminds us of the three most essential principles of Judaism and exhorts us to remember them every day, reciting them as a proclamation of loyalty to our God.

Rabbi Yosef Bitton