BO: Gaza y las diez plagas

Para el Faraón, todo es personal

Moisés advierte al Faraón que si no libera a los judíos, Egipto comenzará a sufrir a causa de diferentes plagas que azotarán a la población. El monarca egipcio, desafiante, no cede. Las plagas comienzan a llegar, y es extremadamente interesante observar cada una de estas plagas y, en especial, cuál es el factor común de las plagas a las cuales el Faraón reacciona citando a Moisés y Aarón, tratando de llegar con ellos a una solución negociada.

En la primera plaga, el Nilo se torna en sangre. El Faraón lo ve y se impresiona, pero no reacciona ni cede ni quiere negociar. La Torá lo describe con un lenguaje muy expresivo: ‘VAYIFEN PAR’O, VAYABO EL BETO’, y el Faraón [vio todo esto], se dio media vuelta y se marchó a su palacio, sin prestarle atención a esta plaga. Aparentemente, y dejando los Midrashim aparte, el Faraón tenía suficientes reservas de agua en su palacio para él y su familia. Pero la población egipcia, que se abastecía directamente de agua del Nilo, se quedó sin agua (hace muchos años, en 1978, viajé a Egipto y en la ciudad de Abu Simbel pude cruzar el río de orilla a orilla y nunca olvidaré haber visto en un bote a una señora agarrando un cántaro y llenándolo de agua del Nilo y bebiendo directamente de ese cántaro, de esa agua). ¿Qué hizo el Faraón? Beber agua no hizo ningún efecto en él.

Luego llegan las ranas. Y ahora la reacción del Faraón es distinta: Llama a Moisés y Aarón y les dice: ‘Recen a su Dios para que saque las ranas de encima de mí y de mi pueblo, y yo los dejaré salir’. Las ranas habían llegado hasta el palacio. El texto dice con mucha exactitud que el Faraón primero pide que le ‘saquen las ranas de encima de él’ y luego que las saquen de los egipcios. Una vez que las ranas desaparecen, el Faraón vuelve a su rutina y no cumple con su promesa.

En la tercera plaga, los piojos, el Faraón no reacciona del todo. La Torá no dice nada explícito acerca de los piojos afectándolo personalmente al Faraón.

La cuarta plaga es el ‘arob. De acuerdo con Ribbí Nejemiá, se trataba de una plaga de varios tipos de insectos, como avispas, mosquitos y posiblemente unas moscas que pican (tábanos) que abundan en las regiones pantanosas del Nilo. ‘Los insectos invadirán tu pueblo y tu casa’, advierte Moisés. El Faraón ahora reacciona. Cita a Moisés y Aarón y les ruega que hagan desaparecer la plaga y que se vayan. Pero cuando los insectos se van, el Faraón da marcha atrás.

La quinta plaga, advierte Moisés, es una epidemia que matará al ganado de todos los civiles egipcios. La plaga mata a los animales, y los egipcios, que ya no tenían agua, ahora no tienen qué comer. Pero al Faraón le queda comida, y esta plaga al parecer no afectó a su ganado privado. Solo a los animales del pueblo (veremos esto retaidicado un poco más adelante). El Faraón, para sorpresa de nadie, no reacciona. No llama a Moisés y Aarón como hizo anteriormente. No se inmuta.

La sexta plaga es la sarna: Moisés arroja hacia arriba un puñado de cenizas ‘frente a los ojos del Faraón’, las cenizas se expanden y se tornan en una enfermedad de la piel que afecta a los habitantes de Egipto, hoy diríamos, a los inocentes civiles. La Torá hace hincapié en que la sarna también afectó a los poderosos magos egipcios. Pero el texto cuidadosamente se mantiene en silencio respecto a la situación ‘personal’ del Faraón. Aparentemente a él no lo afectó la sarna. ¿Qué sucedió entonces? El Faraón no reacciona. No llama a Moisés. No hubo negociaciones.

La séptima plaga es el granizo. Moisés advierte al Faraón que lleve a ‘su’ ganado (que estaba vivo, porque como dijimos antes, parece que no lo afectó la epidemia) bajo techo, ‘y que así proteja a todos sus hombres [esclavos] y todos sus animales, y todo lo que tenga en sus campos, porque si no serán afectados por el granizo y morirán’. ¿Cómo reacciona el Faraón? Llama a Moisés y Aarón y les dice ‘Esta vez yo estuve equivocado… por favor, que termine esta plaga’.

Luego llega la octava plaga: langostas que invaden Egipto y que también afectan ‘las mansiones del Faraón’. El monarca no tiene cómo protegerse de esta plaga. Creo que podemos adivinar lo que sucederá: como esta plaga lo afecta de manera personal, el Faraón hace traer a Moisés y Aarón y les pide que se vayan. Aunque pone condiciones que Moisés no acepta.

Novena plaga: oscuridad, (ver artículo donde explico que posiblemente se trató de una tormenta de arena) que paraliza a todo Egipto, incluyendo al Faraón. Solamente los judíos no fueron afectados por la oscuridad. El monarca egipcio, como era de esperar, reacciona y hace llamar a Moisés y Aarón.

Y finalmente, la muerte de los primogénitos, que también afecta al primogénito del Faraón, el heredero del trono. Es esta plaga la que hace que el Faraón, temiendo ahora por su propia vida, libere a los prisioneros judíos sin ninguna condición ni negociación.

La conclusión es muy clara: al Faraón no le importa el sufrimiento de su pueblo. No le importa la devastación, la sed y el hambre de millones de egipcios. El generoso monarca ‘está dispuesto a sacrificar a su pueblo’ para mantenerse en el poder, cuidar su prestigio, su honor y no perder su gloria. Pero, las plagas lo afectan personalmente a él o afectan sus intereses económicos (sus animales, sus esclavos, etc.), entonces el Faraón comienza a ceder. Este es un sacrificio que NO está dispuesto a hacer.

Esta es la naturaleza de los tiranos. No les importa su pueblo. Están dispuestos a realizar grandes sacrificios nacionales, siempre y cuando no afecten sus propios intereses personales.

No puedo dejar de pensar en las decenas de miles de civiles palestinos que mueren en Gaza, hombres, mujeres, niños. ¿Y por qué sigue esta guerra? Por la increíble crueldad de los líderes de Hamas que no ceden a la única condición de Israel para comenzar el cese de hostilidades: ¡liberar a los prisioneros judíos!

Los líderes de Gaza demuestran que no les importa en lo más mínimo el sacrificio de su propio pueblo, el hambre, la sed, la destrucción. Los lideres “están dispuestos a seguir hasta el final”, y al igual que el faraón, tienen la osadía de imponer condiciones “para que Israel cese el fuego”. ¿Absurdo? Bueno, es la misma historia de las plagas en Egipto que se repite en Gaza.

Quizás es hora de que el Mosad también repita la historia bíblica y se encarguen de que los líderes de Gaza tengan que pagar un precio “personal” y no solo “nacional”, por sus crímenes. Así tal vez liberen a los israelíes secuestrados y finalmente Gaza deje de sufrir.

Porque parece que todo lo demás, no va a funcionar.




BO: Death, as the last resort

The story of the ten plagues is fascinating not only for its content but also for the sophistication of its narrative. The plagues begin with the confrontation of a shy Moses and an arrogant Pharaoh.

BLOOD
When Moshe turns the Nile River into blood, Pharaoh’s reaction consists of indifference and pride. The god “Nile”, one of the principal deities of Egypt, has been defeated, damaged, and wounded. The fishing industry collapsed. Pharaoh –who fed the Nile god with the bodies of the Hebrew infants–now sees with his own eyes how the blood emerges as a testimony of this genocide. But Pharaoh is (or acts as if he was) unimpressed. Far from conceding, he asks his magicians to replicate what appears to be a great act of illusionism, a formidable magic trick performed by Moshe and Aharon. When the magicians replicate the act, the monarch declares victory. He turns his back on Moshe (vayifen) and proudly retreats to the comfort of his palace, thinking that his wizards have won the contest.

FROGS
In the second plague, things begin to affect Pharaoh personally. A massive number of frogs came out of the river and invaded the homos or regular Egyptians and Pharaoh’s palace and rooms. Egyptians worshipped frogs as the gods of reproduction. But that power of reproduction is now out of control, infesting and damaging Egypt. The wizards, once again, can reproduce the plague. But Pharaoh realizes – a little late – that what he needs from his magicians is not just a demonstration that they can replicate the trick. He needs them “to stop the plague”, and control the frogs! When the wizards fail to do that, Pharaoh sends for Moses and Aharon and begins to negotiate. He lies. He tells them that if they stop the plague of frogs, he will accept their demands. Then, when the frogs leave, Pharaoh hardens his heart and breaks his promise, probably thinking that Moshe has exhausted all his magic and doesn’t let the people go.
LICE
The third plague is lice. Pharaoh confirms what he already suspected: his illusionists cannot stop the plagues. His wizards have been defeated, and he realizes that his gods have been affected. The Egyptians revered insects as the invisible, magical manifestation of divine spirits. And now those gods were also turning against the Egyptians.
THE ECONOMY
Egypt is the most prosperous and powerful nation in the Middle East. The only land in that arid region that, thanks to its mighty Nile river, does not depend on rain to survive. By the seventh plague, mentioned in our weekly Parasha, the Egyptian empire is in ruins, and Pharaoh’s advisers declare the plagues a national disaster. Everything that contributed to Egypt’s prosperity collapsed: first, the fishing industry, then the livestock, and now, the last plagues — hail and locust — destroyed the harvest. Now more desperate, Pharaoh wishes to continue the negotiations and is willing to offer more concessions, but at this point, Moshe does not give in.
DARKNESS
When the ninth plague, darkness, arrives, Egypt is completely paralyzed. This plague also has a devastating psychological effect on Pharaoh and his people. Why? Because the primary God of the Egyptians was “Ra”, the sun god. Egyptians are now witnessing the humiliating defeat of Egypt’s supreme God and discovering that no imaginary deity has any real power. Paganism collapsed. The plagues demonstrated that the Egyptian gods and deities were nothing but imaginary powers. Egyptians -and most importantly: the Hebrews– are beginning to understand that the invisible God of the Jews controls all forces of nature.
THE LAST RESOURCE
Then we have the last plague: the death of the firstborn, which brought the most severe psychological, devastating effect on Egyptian culture and theology. Egyptians were obsessed with death and claimed they possessed the secrets of immortality. When a nobleman: a Pharaoh, a priest, or a firstborn (who fulfilled priestly functions) was about to die, preparations would be made in advance to assist their spirits in their journey to immortality: bodies were mummified, servants were sacrificed, and treasures would be placed next to the nobleman’s body. Sometimes, a pyramid would be built to protect the body until reanimation happens. But when death was not natural but sudden, like in the Tenth Plague, these preparations for eternity were not obtained. With the end of the firstborn, the illusion of immortality came to an end.

WHO SAID THE WORD “DEATH” FIRST?
Finally, there is something else we should notice in the tenth plague. During the first eight plagues, Pharaoh defied Moshe and tried to humiliate him but never threatened Moshe with death. In the ninth plague, however, Pharaoh tells Moses. “You can leave, you and your people, the elderly and children, but you must leave your livestock here.” Pharaoh still plays games. He agrees to let the Jerw go, but in his terms and conditions: Do not take your assets with you as a guarantee that you will return. Moshe rejects the offer. And at that moment, the very nervous Pharaoh losses his patience, and “death” is mentioned for the first time: (Shemot, Exodus, 10:27): “Get out of here — he says to Moshe– and never see me again because the day that you would appear before me, you will die.” The death of the firstborn was the last resort, convincing Pharaoh to let the Hebrew slaves go. All the other warnings were ignored and failed to subdue the arrogance of the tyrant dictator. But it was not Moshe, but Pharaoh, who put “death” on the negotiating table for the first time.




VAERA: The Miraculous Rejection of the Ceasefire (2014)

ChatGPT said:

(Written in July 2014)
I would like to refer to Parashat Vaera, the second parasha of the Book of Shemot, and its main character, Pharaoh.

Moshe initially offers Pharaoh a peaceful and civilized solution: “Let my people go. We do not seek revenge for 210 years of slavery, nor do we want you or your people to suffer. We only want to be free to serve our God.” However, Pharaoh refused to free the Hebrew slaves. Moshe clarified that he was speaking on behalf of the God of the Hebrews, who regards the people of Israel as His child, and that if Pharaoh did not let His children go, Egypt would suffer the consequences. Pharaoh refused once again.

Then HaShem sent the first plague: blood. But the vain Pharaoh was not intimidated: “A great magic trick,” he reasoned, and continued his refusal. Frogs invaded Egypt, and Pharaoh thought, “Well, this might not be a magic trick, but perhaps it’s a cosmic coincidence.” Then Egypt was filled with lice (kinim) and later with insects (‘arov). Pharaoh requested a “humanitarian ceasefire,” asking Moshe to remove the plague and promising he would let them go free. However, once the plague was gone, Pharaoh again refused to release them. Even after the fifth plague (dever, cattle disease), Pharaoh persisted in his refusal.

By now, Pharaoh was witnessing the collapse of Egypt’s economy and the first casualties of the battle. Undoubtedly, many Egyptian civilians had died because of Pharaoh’s stubbornness and his refusal to end hostilities. Yet Pharaoh never pointed the finger at himself. He never took responsibility for the consequences of his decisions.

Pharaoh began to realize something else. He understood that perhaps he had miscalculated the power of the One fighting for the Hebrews. He slightly lowered his “demands,” but essentially, he did not deviate from his original position and persisted in his rejection.

In the eighth plague (arbe, locusts), we see the first cracks in Pharaoh’s cabinet. Pharaoh’s officials begged him to let the Israelites go and stop the rocket launches. Yet Pharaoh was unwilling to yield.

The big question is: once Pharaoh realized that the forces of Am Israel were so powerful, and especially once he saw Egypt’s destruction and civilian deaths, how could he still refuse Moshe’s proposal? It makes no sense.

The Torah states that HaShem “hardened his heart,” meaning that God intervened in Pharaoh’s thoughts, affecting his objective judgment. Maimonides explains that HaShem typically does not interfere with our decision-making process. He granted humans free will and holds us accountable for our decisions. But Pharaoh’s case was an exception. Pharaoh had five opportunities to backtrack, stop the hostilities, and let the Jews go. But as some say, Pharaoh never missed an opportunity to miss an opportunity. From his total free will, he refused. After the fifth refusal, Maimonides explains, HaShem took away Pharaoh’s freedom of choice.

Other commentators offer a different interpretation of why HaShem intervened and prevented Pharaoh from surrendering. Some say HaShem wanted the whole world, and especially the Jews, to know that HaShem always has a way of saving His people from the hands of their enemies, even by intervening in their thoughts.

This morning, I read in Israeli newspapers that Hamas prisoners captured by Israel in battle confessed to the terrorist organization’s macabre plan. Hamas planned to attack Israel on the upcoming Rosh Hashanah, sending hundreds of terrorists through their network of terror tunnels. The terrorists would have entered Israel’s territory on Rosh Hashanah 5775 and, God forbid, killed thousands of Jews. Israeli newspaper headlines read: “The discovery of these tunnels prevented a tragedy on the scale of the Yom Kippur War” (in which 2,800 Israeli soldiers died and 9,000 were wounded).

I asked myself: What would have happened if two weeks ago, when Israel offered Hamas “silence and peace” for Gaza if Hamas simply stopped launching rockets at Israel, Hamas had said “yes”? The answer: all those tunnels would still be there! What happened? Why did Hamas reject a ceasefire? Did they miscalculate the possible response of the Israeli army or its determination to enter Gaza?

What would have happened if Hamas leaders had accepted the ceasefire offered by Egypt, the European Union, Kerry, or the UN? If Hamas had accepted repeated offers to end hostilities, the tunnels—at least most of them—would not have been discovered by Israel, leaving Israel exposed to an existential threat. But incredibly, and against all military or social logic, Hamas refused. Again and again, it was Hamas that said NO to the ceasefire.

Perhaps, because Pharaoh’s refusal was mirrored in Hamas’s refusal, HaShem intervened in the thoughts of our enemies once again to thwart the plans of those who seek to destroy us.

Shabbat Shalom

שיר המעלות לדוד לולי ה’ שהיה לנו יאמר נא ישראל
לולי ה’ שהיה לנו בקום עלינו אדם
אזי חיים בלעונו בחרות אפם בנו
אזי המים שטפונו נחלה עבר על נפשנו
אזי עבר על נפשנו המים הזידונים
ברוך ה’ שלא נתננו טרף לשניהם
נפשנו כצפור נמלטה מפח יוקשים הפח נשבר ואנחנו נמלטנו
עזרנו בשם ה’ עושה שמים וארץ

1. A Song of Ascents, by David:
“If HaShem had not been on our side,” let all of Israel proclaim.
2. “If HaShem had not been on our side when men [=the enemies of Israel] came to attack us,
3. they would have swallowed us alive, in their burning hatred against us!
4. Like torrents of water, they would have overwhelmed us; waters would have drowned us.
5. Those deadly waters of violence would have swept over our very lives.
6. Blessed is HaShem, who did not let them tear us apart with their teeth.
7. We escaped like a bird escaping from the hunter’s trap. The trap was broken, and we were freed.
8. Our help comes from HaShem, the Creator of heaven and earth.”




VAERA: Pharaoh and His Gambling Problem

Every time I read this Parasha, I feel perplexed and fascinated by the behavior of Pharaoh. During the plagues, Pharaoh even admitted that he was wrong and said: “I have sinned before HaShem, your God … and now, please forgive my sin only this time, and pray to HaShem your God, to take away this mortal [plague from me].”  but as soon as the plagues disappear, Pharaoh changes his mind and refuses to let the people of Israel out of Egypt.
What’s going on? Why does Pharaoh behave in such an irrational, suicidal way?
Two explanations.
The first is a theological explanation. HaShem intervenes in the ‘heart’ of Pharaoh. It influences his decision and triggers his “stubbornness”. According to Rabbi Don Isaac Abarbanel, HaShem did this not to compromise Pharaoh’s free will but to preserve it. Let me explain: If God would reveal Himself to us, and we could see and experiment His Presence beyond any doubt, would anyone dare not observe Shabbat, for example? Would anyone even think about eating non-Kosher food, and challenging God, so to speak, face to face? If our knowledge of God was absolute, we could not choose to obey or disobey Him. Certainty of His existence would turn us into robots (or “angels”, but that is for another conversation), incapable of disobeying a Divine order. In this sense, the invisibility of HaShem, His deliberate concealment, allows us to maintain our ability to choose and disobey or the merit of obeying Him. Back to Pharaoh. Pharaoh was “the only person who knew” when each plague would begin and when it would end because Moshe reported directly to him. The evidence of Divine intervention, His “existence”, was overwhelming for Pharaoh. Undeniable. Technically,  Pharaoh should have become a robot, deprived of free will, unable to disobey, ergo, “free of responsibility.” Therefore, to preserve Pharaoh’s ability to choose –and make him accountable for his YES or his NO– HaShem intervenes in his thoughts making his “heart”  stubborn and uncompromising, and in this way restoring his ability to choose. Thus, Pharaoh becomes again responsible for what he chooses. Maimonides explains that this type of intervention in human thought is not the rule. A King’s case is an exception.
The second explanation is rooted in psychology, precisely the behavior of a gambling addict. When an addict reaches a point of no return, they exhibit self-destructive behavior, continuing to gamble despite the obvious consequences. In the same way, after the fifth plague, Pharaoh could no longer go back and let the Israelites leave without losing all his remaining prestige and credibility. He has reached a point of no return and continues to gamble with the fate of his people.
I believe we can also explain the behavior of Pharaoh in this way. After the fifth plague, Pharaoh’s position had become untenable. He had already caused immense suffering and loss for his people, and if he were to allow the Israelites to leave, he would lose whatever remained of his prestige and credibility. But instead of acknowledging the hopelessness of his situation, Pharaoh continues to gamble, refusing to admit defeat and releasing the Israelites. Pharaoh knows that he has reached a point of no return. And he decides to continue gambling. I believe it is possible to explain that Divine intervention brought the possibility of Pharaoh’s free will,  but the “gambling effect” also influenced Pharaoh’s behavior and refusal.
What happened to Pharaoh is a great lesson for all: 1. We must identify possible points of no return in any area of our lives. 2. We must avoid falling into any downward spiral of self-destruction. 3. And if we ever, recklessly, find ourselves in such a spiral, we should learn from this story of Pharaoh that it is better to stop on time in one piece than to keep running towards the cliff.



Pharaoh and the Two Midwives

אֲשֶׁ֨ר שֵׁ֤ם הָֽאַחַת֙ שִׁפְרָ֔ה וְשֵׁ֥ם הַשֵּׁנִ֖ית פּוּעָֽה

Pharaoh planned the final solution to the Jewish problem. The plan begins by recruiting collaborators. It was not easy to convince the Egyptians that they should denounce and send the Jews to labor camps (concentration), and then they should kill the Hebrew babies. After all, the Jews had been neighbors of the Egyptians for several generations. To gain the collaboration of his people, Pharaoh delivered the famous inflammatory anti-Semitic speech (see above) in which he accused the Jews of being traitors. And his plan worked.

CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE

The first phase of Pharaoh’s plan is done in secret. To prevent the demographic growth of the Jewish people, Pharaoh orders the midwives to “discreetly” kill the babies, probably by hitting their little heads on the stone on which Jewish women give birth. The main thing was to make it look like an accident. Surprisingly, the midwives decided to disobey Pharaoh! Sages have different opinions about the ethnicity of these midwives. Were they Hebrew or Egyptian? The biblical text is ambiguous. hamyaledot haibriot could be understood as “Jewish” midwives or Egyptian midwives “who assisted Jewish women in giving birth.”

Today, we will explore this second opinion, which seems to me to be the most compatible with the peshat textual narrative and represents, among others, the opinion of Rabbi Don Isaac Abarbanel ( מיתו ולדיהן, אבל היו מצריות מילדות את העבריות, ר”‘). These Egyptian midwives who refused to follow Pharaoh’s orders and let the children live are presented explicitly with their names “Shifrá” and “Puá.”

This extraordinary act of courage cannot be taken lightly.

Let’s analyze it a little more in-depth.

WHAT DID THE MIDWIVES DO?

The midwives disobeyed a direct order from the man with supreme authority in Egypt, considered “a god”, the ruler of the most powerful country in the world, at the time of Egypt’s highest peak, the beginning of the 18th dynasty. This was not an ordinary act of giving up assigned tasks; it was an act of rebellion, of civil disobedience, perhaps the first recorded in the history of humanity.

WHY DID THEY DO IT?

Why did the midwives let the Jewish children live? The Torah explains it with simple but very profound words. “vatirena hamyaledot et haEloqim,” these non-Jewish women “feared God.”

Although the topic of fear of God is very deep, I will mention three brief ideas about it.

First, in the Tora, fear of God (=Eloqim) appears many times in the context of the behavior of non-Jews. When it comes to a Jewish context, the fear of “HaShem” is usually mentioned with the Divine name in Hebrew (A-do -nay) . The fact that the midwives mentioned “God” and not “HaShem” gives more weight to the claim that these midwives were not Jewish.

Secondly, the “fear of God” prevents a person from doing something wrong, refusing to do something wrong “in the eyes of God.” To understand it better, let’s compare it with the “love of God”, which leads someone to act with generosity, dedication, and kindness. The love of God is active, and the fear of God is passive but no less important!

Third, and perhaps the most critical point, is that the fear of God is presented in opposition to the fear of man, in this case, the fear of a tyrant. Midwives embrace the fear of God and minimize the fear of Pharaoh. And in a way, they are willing to accept Pharaoh’s punishment – torture and execution – inspired by their fear of God.

WHAT PRICE DID THEY PAY FOR THEIR DISOBEDIENCE?

Pharaoh receives the complaint that they have disobeyed him and summons them to his court to demand an explanation. The midwives present their arguments and explain that Jewish women give birth naturally (חיות הנה), on their own, and when they arrive to “kill male Jewish babies by accident,” it is already too late for that not to be noticed. Although I do not remember any commentator explaining it this way, I think it is also possible that this bravery inspired Pharaoh’s daughter, who, defying her father’s will, saved a Hebrew boy from certain death. That child was Moses.

Then come the enigmatic Hebrew words vaya’as lahem batim —”he made for them houses.”

First interpretation: Pharaoh did not forgive them but sent them to prison (batim, “houses, cells”). Following this interpretation, these women paid for “houses of perpetual confinement” in jail for their brave actions to save the Hebrew children.

HOW WAS YOUR ACT OF BRAVERY REWARDED?

But there is a second possible interpretation of the Hebrew word “batim.” Memorable dynasty, nobility, and fame. Like when one says that he or she comes “from the House of David.” Always following the opinion that these midwives were not Jewish, it is possible that the token of gratitude for having saved so many lives of the people of Israel was that the Tora mentioned these women “explicitly” by their names: Shifrá and Puá.

When we pay close attention to the biblical text, peshat, we will realize that in the entire story of slavery and the birth of Moshe (first two chapters of Shemot), the Torah does NOT mention the names of any of its protagonists, not even Yochebed, Miriam or Bitia—Pharaoh’s daughter. The only exception is SHIFRA AND PUA. Thus, the act of bravery of these simple midwives was immortalized in the memory of the Jewish people, who repeat their names every time we read the Torah. It is worth mentioning – and realizing this contrast – that the Torah does not even mention Pharaoh by name, the most powerful man on earth; he ends up being an anonymous tyrant who does not deserve to be remembered and who, even Today, his identity is disputed.

YAD VASHEM: TRIBUTE WITH NAMES

The Tora pays tribute to the memory of these brave women, “mentioning their act of valor and their names.” This is the way that the Jewish people—and the State of Israel—pay tribute to the memory of the Gentiles who risked or sacrificed their lives to save Jewish lives. This biblical gratitude is repeated, for example, in the section of the YAD VASHEM Holocaust museum dedicated to “the righteous among the nations” חֲסִידֵי אֻמּוֹת הָעוֹלָם perpetuating their memory, the mention of their “yad”, actions, and his “Shem”, his name, just as the Torah did with Shifrah and Puah.

Today Israel has many – too many enemies who shamelessly celebrate the Hamas massacre, accuse Israel of defending itself and avoiding a new massacre, and practice the hypocrisy of double standards, such as the Secretary General of the United Nations and many more (yemach shemam = may their names be erased, forgotten), who will never take the side of truth, justice, and objectivity.

On the other hand, many, many non-Jews support us, silently or out loud, like the author and journalist Douglas Murray, Erin Molan, and so many others, who deserve our deepest gratitude and tribute.




How was assimilation prevented in Egypt?

When our patriarch Ya’aqob was getting ready to descend to Egypt and reunite with his son Yosef —Egypt’s second most powerful man— he feared and hesitated. HaShem then revealed Himself to Ya’aqob and said: “Do not be afraid to descend to Egypt, Ya’aqob. There I will make you a great nation”.

What was Ya’aqob afraid of?

PREVENTING THE INEVITABLE

Our last patriarch feared that his grandchildren and his great-grandchildren would assimilate into the prestigious Egyptian culture, and end up becoming “Egyptians of Semitic origin”. The assimilation of immigrants to a land that welcomes them is not only common, but normal and in a certain way, inevitable. In the United States there are grandchildren and great-grandchildren of Italian, Irish or Polish immigrants, who arrived here at the beginning of the 20th century or before!. Today, they consider themselves 100% American. They do not have, to my knowledge, any “existential” connection with the ancient European lands of their ancestors or their ancient traditions,  except perhaps in culinary matters. This was Ya’aqob’s fear. That his descendants would assimilate and become 100% Egyptians.

Ya’aqob did two things to prevent assimilation. Firstly,  according to our Sages, Ya’aqob sent Yehuda before the family arrived and entrusted him with the organization of a Hebrew school or Talmud Tora. In this way, they could continue to educate their children and theach them the values ​​of Abraham Abinu.

Second, Ya’aqob asked (demanded!) Yosef to take his body and bury it in the land of Israel. In this way, his grandchildren and great-grandchildren would always keep in mind that their place is in Israel.  In this sense, Yaaqob was the first Zionist.

YOSEF JOINS FORCES

Yosef, on the other hand, also took several measures to avoid assimilation.

First, he established his family in the land of Goshen, a separated land. And he made it clear to Pharaoh, and to his own family, that they would continue to dedicate themselves to raise cattle, a job that was taboo for Egyptians, because of their religious beliefs (they believed, like many Hindus today, that some animals embodied the spirit of gods or dead people, and need to be left alone, feed and even worshiped). In this way, Yosef wanted his family to maintain a limited social relationship with the Egyptians.  And finally, Yosef, as his father did, made his descendants swear that his body will also be taken out of Egypt to the land of Israel.

APPEARANCE, NAMES AND LANGUAGE

And then, more. Jews refused to adopt certain key elements of Egyptian society. The children and descendants of Israel kept the traditional Semitic dress, and did not adopt the Egyptian dress code. Most Jewish men would grow a beard and wear special colored tunics. The image we see above shows a Semitic family –the Egyptians were not Semites– that came from Canaan in the 19th century b.c.e. We can clearly see the beards and tunics, as opposed to the shaven (or beardless) Egyptians with white tunics or skirts.  The dress code of the descendants of Ya’aqob was different. You could tell visually who is a Jew by the way he or she is dressed.

Our Sages also explained that Jews did not change their Hebrew names for Egyptian names. Someone namd “Levi” or “Shimon” could only be a Jew. 

Finally, Jews did not change their language. This means that parents spoke Hebrew at their house, and teachers probably spoke Hebrew in the schools. And perhaps, if the mother-language was Hebrew, when they spoke Egyptian Jews had a “Hebrew accent”.

WHAT DID WE LEARN FROM YOSEF?

Regarding the origin of these three elements, my son David shared with me this chiddush (= creative interpretation). He told me that these three elements were mentioned by the Tora in the story of Yosef. When he was forced to appear in front of Pharaoh and later in front of the Egyptian society. The very first thing that Egyptians did to Yosef, when he was taking out of prison, was shaving him and dress him like an Egyptian. Then, the  Egyptians changed his Hebrew name”Yosef” for an Egyptian name, “Tsafenat Pa’aneah” (the decipherer of the occult). And finally, we also witness that Yosef embraces  the Egyptian language as his first language, since when he communicated with his brothers, before revealing his true identity, he did so through an interpreter.  I do not think it is coincidence that these same three elements –clothing, name, language– have been identified by our Sages (or perhaps by Yosef himself!) as the key elements that would lead to or accelerate the process of assimilation of a human group into its new home.

LEARNING FROM THE PAST

Summarizing and thinking about our present reality, we learn that 3500 years ago our ancestors did every possible effort to avoid assimilation by having their own Jewish education system;  maintaining a very strong connection with the land of Israel;  living in community; working in jobs that allows limited interaction with Egyptians; wearing something that indicated that they were Jewish (similar, for example, to a Kippa today); maintaining their Hebrew names and learning and speaking Hebrew: the language of Abraham, Yitshaq and Ya’aqob.

That’s the old good formula to prevent assimilation.




Rabbi Elyashiv and the number of Jews that left Egypt

How is it possible that the people of Israel reproduced so greatly in Egypt within a period of just 210 years?

Let us recall that the Tora explicitly indicates just two things:

 1- The number of Jewish men who arrived to Egypt was 70.  

2- When they left Egypt, there were 600,000 men between the ages of 20 and 60 years old. Including the women, children and elderly we assume a number of approximately 3 million.

THE MORE COMPLEX RESPONSE

Rabbi Shemuel David Luzzatto (1800-1865) formulated a couple of ideas that, although not far from the peshat– that is, the literal meaning of the biblical text- are still a little bit controversial.  He says that based on one explicit verse, Jews were in Egypt not for 210 years, but for 430 years (Shemot 12:40).  He also states that when the Tora speaks of the generations that have passed since the jews arrived to Egypt (too few to cover more than 400 years) the text does not refer to “father > son” rather, “patriarch > descendants” (this article in Hebrew explains in more detail the opinion of Rabbi Luzzatto) .

THE SAGES’ RESPONSE

Rabbi Luzzatto’s position might have a textual merit, but let us first explore the feasibility of what our Sages themselves state: the amount of time that the Jews spent in Egypt was indeed 210 years (116 of which they had spent in slavery). 

Our Sages, who also inquire as to how 70 families became 600,000, explain that Jewish women would birth to up to “6 children at a time” (bekeres echad). Yet I believe that we don’t even need to resort to the case of multiple sextuples to explain the increase in numbers.

THE EFFECTS OF MARRYING YOUNG

The most essential thing to understand is that 210 years could cover up to 10 generations- when taking into account that Jews, who have always practiced premarital abstinence, generally marry young. Until today, most observant Jews marry on average by 21-24 years of age. If 70 men arrived in Israel (with their wives) and each couple had, say a total of 6 children, in 6 generations will count: 3,265,920  (70 x 6 x 6 x 6 x 6 x 6 x 6). 

We have an explicit example of a family of 6 generations in the case of Yehuda. Yehuda came down to Egypt and Nachson left Egypt, six generations later. Yehuda> Peretz> Hetsron> Ram> Aminadab> Nahshon. And Nahshon probably already had his own children when he left Egypt.  Dibre haYamim I (7:22) counts 9 generations from Efrayim, the son of Yosef, to Yehoshua bin Nun.   

RABBI ELYASHIV RESPONSE

I believe that the best way to grasp the realism of these Biblical numbers and the Rabbis’ opinions comes from the life of Rabbi Yosef Shalom Elyashiv z”l.  This prestigious contemporary rabbi was the only child born to his parents after 17 years of marriage. He was born in 1910 and died in 2012. He reached a privileged age of 102 years. 

Now, how many descendants did Rabbi Elyashiv left in this world when he passed away? 

He had 12 children. And according to Wikipedia at the time of his death he had about 1,400 descendants, over 6 generations (See here). The secret? 1. His children, grandchildren, great-grandchildren and great-great-grandchildren also had a significant number of children (probably an average of 8 children) and 2. They married relatively young.




10th Of Tebet: Holocaust Remembrance Day

YOM HAKADDISH HAKELALI

In modern Israel, the 10th of Tebet is also set as the day of the Kaddish haKelaly. According to the Chief Rabbinate of Israel, on the Tenth of Tebet a remembrance-candle should be light in the Synagogue, and the Hazkara leChalale haShoah, the memorial prayer for the victims of the Holocaust, should be recited. Additionally, it is traditional in Ashkenazi communities that all those whose parents are not alive should say Kaddish Yatom in ‘asara beTebet (Rabbanut haRashit LeIsrael, luah dinim uminhaguim 5772, pages. 55,109).
This point requires more explanation.
In 1949, and before the day of Yom HaShoah was established, the Chief Rabbinate of Israel decided that the Tenth of Tebet should be assigned as the national remembrance day for the victims of the Holocaust. They recommended traditional Jewish ways of remembering the dead, such as the study of Mishna Miqvaot, recitation of Tehilim, lighting a candle and a collective recitation of the Kaddish for the victims of the Holocaust, particularly for those whose names and date of death remain unknown. Fasting, the most common Jewish expression of sorrow, was already prescribed for this day.
In Israel many people felt that the horror of the Holocaust should be remembered on its own, and a special day, in which nothing else is remembered, should be dedicated to the Shoah’s victims’ memory. “For the survivors there was only one day worthy of being a memorial anniversary for the Holocaust, April 19, the beginning day of the Warsaw ghetto revolt the greatest revolt of them all, the uprisings that had held the Nazis at bay for a longer period than the great French army” (I. Greenberg). That is how the 27 of Nissan (April 19, 1943) was chosen to commemorate Yom haShoah. Yom HaShoah was inaugurated in 1953, by a law signed by the Prime Minister of Israel David ben Gurion.
Since then, and in practical terms, there are two days in which we mourn for the Holocaust: Yom haShoah, the official day, and ‘asara beTebet, in which many people would say the Kaddish haKelaly to remember the victims of the Nazi genocide, whose names remain unknown.
On the 10th of Tebet there are only two restrictions: eating and drinking. NO additional limitations apply, such as the prohibition of wearing leather shoes, working, driving, washing the body, etc. Most contemporary Rabbis (for example Rab O. Yosef z”l, or Rab E. Melamed) authorize washing one’s mouth or brush one’s teeth in this fast day if needed, provided you are careful to lower your head, avoiding swallowing water unintentionally.

WHO NEEDS TO FAST AND WHO DOES NOT?

*Minors: boys under 13 and girls under 12 years old are completely exempted from fasting.
*Nursing women: According to the Sephardic tradition after giving birth women are exempted from fasting for 24 months, even if they are not actually nursing their baby. Rab Obadia Yosef says that this applies if a women feels weak. Otherwise, if she is not nursing her baby she should fast.
*Pregnant women, especially after the first 3 months, are exempted from fasting.
*A person who feels sick–for example, flu or fever– or one who has a chronic disease–for example diabetes– should not fast.
*Elders should consult with their physicians if the fast will not affect their health. If it will, they are exempted (and in some cases, prohibited) from fasting.
 



The SEGULA of Maimonides to enjoy good health


The reality is simple and indisputable: our health depends on two major factors:

  1. The actions we take to care for our own health.

  2. Factors that affect our health but are beyond our control.

When it comes to what we cannot control, we place our trust in HaShem.
That is why praying and asking HaShem to protect us from diseases, and to help us heal when we are ill, is essential.

At the same time, Judaism teaches that there is a strong interaction between HaShem and the physician.
Being a doctor is one of the noblest professions, because the physician acts as a proxy of God.
In my own words: HaShem heals us through the doctors.
When a surgeon operates, we believe that HaShem is guiding his hands.

For this reason, unlike certain other religions or cults, Judaism considers it a mitzva — an obligation — to visit doctors regularly and entrust ourselves to their care.
As the Tora commands:
וְנִשְׁמַרְתֶּם מְאֹד לְנַפְשֹׁתֵיכֶם
“You shall diligently guard your lives.”

Maintaining good health requires, first of all, routine medical checkups — especially when we have, or suspect we have, any symptoms of illness.

Keeping ourselves healthy also means staying away from bad habits.
For example: smoking.
If I smoke, I cannot expect HaShem to protect me from the consequences of tobacco.
Nor can I expect the doctor to perform miraculous treatments on my lungs while I continue to smoke.

In addition to avoiding bad habits, we must also adopt preventive habits.

Many of these “segulot” for preventing illness were formulated by haRambam — Maimonides — 800 years ago.
Maimonides, who was not only a great rabbi but also a famous physician, devoted an entire chapter of Mishne Tora (Hilkhot De’ot, chapter 4) to preventive medicine.
Anticipating the modern concept of “preventive medicine” by eight centuries, Maimonides discussed diet, sleep, physical exercise, hygiene, and more.

Let’s begin with what he taught about eating habits.

The first thing we must improve, according to Maimonides, is our eating. He teaches us that we should eat in moderation: eat to live, and not live to eat.

In De’ot, chapter 4, halakha 2, Maimonides warns about overeating — in Hebrew, akhila gasa — gluttony:
“One should not eat until his stomach is full, but only up to three-quarters of his total satisfaction.”
In other words, it is actually good to feel a little hungry after we finish eating. It is a desirable and healthy habit.

We live in a time when most of us, Barukh HaShem, have food on our tables.
In the United States, for example, the major public health problem is no longer malnutrition, but overeating.
Obesity has become an epidemic and is now the number one health risk for millions of people.

Maimonides said it explicitly in 4:15:
“Overeating (akhila gasa) is toxic to the body of any person. It is the main source of all diseases. Most illnesses that afflict a person are caused either by eating harmful foods or by filling the stomach and overeating — even with healthy foods.”
He adds that King Solomon already warned about this in Mishle (Proverbs) 21:23:
“Whoever cares for his mouth and his tongue preserves his soul from anguish.”
“Caring for his mouth” includes avoiding harmful foods and refraining from overeating.

Finally, I leave for the end what I consider the most practical and powerful piece of advice from Maimonides regarding eating habits:

4:1 — “Do not eat unless you are hungry.”

SEGULA: Repeat these words of Maimonides in Hebrew with nekudot:
לְעוֹלָם לֹא יֹאכַל אָדָם אֶלָּא כְּשֶׁהוּא רָעֵב וְלֹא יִשְׁתֶּה אֶלָּא כְּשֶׁהוּא צָמֵא

Eating healthily and avoiding overeating will help us enjoy a long life of good health.




VAYIGGASH: Yosef and the Three Levels of Forgiveness

Yosef sees his brothers, who betrayed him 20 years ago and sold him into slavery. They came to Egypt to get food. Now, he has to decide what to do with his siblings: take revenge on them, ignore them, forgive them?

Yosef’s first option, the most “average”, course of action, would have been revenge. He suffered tremendously all those years away from his father’s home. The sadness and pain of slavery were undoubtedly overwhelming. When Yosef’s brothers come to Egypt, he is in a position of power and can “make them pay for all the suffering they caused him.” But revenge was not what moved Yosef. Yosef had “unilaterally” overcome his resentment. How do we know? When his first child is born, he names him “Menashe”; that is: “God has benefited me so much that made me forget (nashani) all the suffering” caused by my brothers. Yosef did not allow the pain and anger of the past to define his future. Yosef was not thinking of revenge. He had gotten over that self-destructive feeling.

 

IGNORE?

Yosef’s other option was to “ignore” his brothers. If Yosef didn’t want revenge, he could have chosen to be indifferent, pretend he didn’t see them, and continue his extraordinary life and brilliant career in Egypt, the most powerful country of antiquity. Why would Yosef want to rebuild his relationship with his brothers, who acted worse than his worst enemies? He didn’t need them in his life again! But Yosef does not ignore them. When he sees them, he comes up with a master plan of several moves: he accuses them of espionage and demands that they bring in Binyamin, his younger brother. When Binyamin arrives, he imprisons him on a false accusation and proposes to the brothers that they return home “safe and sound,” leaving Binyamin as his slave in Egypt. In this way, Yosef reenacts and reconstructs –in the best or only way possible– a scenario similar to the one that took place 20 years ago. Yosef allows them to redeem themselves and show that they are now willing to sacrifice one for the other. When Yosef realizes that his brothers have learned their lesson and are unwilling to repeat their mistakes, he reveals his identity and forgives them.

 

RECONCILIATION

The level of forgiveness we see in Yosef’s story is exceptional and almost superhuman. Since Yosef does not forgive them with a speech full of reproaches or resentment, it is a total reconciliation. In the first place, Yosef’s gesture is selfless since Yosef has nothing to “gain” in terms of his career or prestige in Egypt by forgiving his brothers.

Yosef acts out of pure altruism and extraordinary kindness. Secondly, Yosef takes one more unexpected step. Far from accusing them, he does his best to relieve his brothers of their guilt and tries to convince them — with a euphemistic version of the events– that the tragic actions of the past “were not their responsibility.” Those were events orchestrated by the Almighty to save millions of Egyptians and his own family from starvation. Far from looking for distance, Yosef offers his brothers to live “with him” in the prestigious neighborhood of Goshen in the Nile Delta. Yosef achieves what seemed impossible: reuniting a family that was completely broken. Rabbi Sabato, from Yeshiva Birkat Moshe, explains that Yosef is called Yosef haTzadiq, Yosef the Just, not only because of what he went through (or did not go through) with Potiphar’s wife but because of his incredible ability to forgive.

 

 

EXONERATION

Dr. Stephen Marmer, a psychiatrist at the University of California, UCLA, describes three types of forgiveness: 1. Release. 2. Tolerance and 3. Exoneration (we are referring here to forgiveness between family members, friends, and colleagues, and not to forgive crimes, terrorism, etc.).

 

“Release” is unilateral forgiveness. In other words, when the offender does not apologize to the victim and does not have the will to repair or ask forgiveness. However, the victims choose to “forget” the incident, thus preventing the toxic memory of the offender from living inside their minds and freeing themselves from the poisonous effects of resentment. There is no reconciliation here, and the parties remain estranged.

 

“Tolerance” is when the victim has received a partial or insincere apology because the offender, for example, has not taken sufficient responsibility for their actions. However, the victim chooses to forgive and rebuild the relationship since it is important for him to maintain it, although now he will act more cautiously.

 

“Exoneration” is the highest level of forgiveness, which occurs when one seeks to restore the relationship to the level before the offense occurred. Exoneration often occurs when the victim realizes (or voluntarily or strategically chooses to assume) that the offense was an accident. Or the offender acted impulsively without realizing they were causing you pain. Or when the offender sincerely regrets his mistake, takes full responsibility, and apologizes for what he did.

 

Let’s go back to Yosef. First, and even before he saw his brothers, Yosef unilaterally decided to forgive, and as an act of free will, he freed himself from resentment. Later, he chose not to ignore his brothers and sought to reconnect with them. But his nobility did not end there. Yosef completely forgave his brothers. He understood – or chose to assume – that they acted impulsively, and now they did Teshuba. That is, they repented and changed. Yosef does not turn the page. Yosef starts a new book. The new relationship between the brothers will not be as it was in the past. It’s going to be better! This type of reconciliation and exoneration between siblings, friends, or husband and wife can be “magical”, and it has the power to take us from the depths of hostility to an unimaginable, higher than before, level of relationship, where the sky is the limit.