Jeremiah the Prophet & The Worst Deal Of Your Life

THE THREE HAFTAROT

The mourning customs observed between the 17th of Tammuz and the 9th of Av vary from one community to another. But there is a tradition that is the same for Sephardic, Ashkenazi, and all Jewish communities around the world: the Haftarot that we read during the three Shabbats between the 17th of Tammuz and the 9th of Av. These three texts are known in Hebrew as תלתא דפורענותא, the prophecies that predicted the tragedies we had to live through.

First, let’s better understand what the Haftarah is. In the synagogue, after completing the reading of the weekly Torah portion, we read a text from the Prophets that relates in content to the biblical portion that has just concluded. The Haftarot were established by our Sages about 2,000 years ago when the Romans prohibited Jews from reading the Torah, with the purpose of recalling the weekly biblical portion. The Haftarot we read during these three Shabbats, however, are not thematically related to the weekly portion but to the destruction of the Bet haMiqdash and the exile.

To be more precise, these Haftarot that describe the historical events related to these tragedies were expressed by two prophets, Jeremiah and Isaiah when they warned the people of Israel about the consequences of abandoning the covenant with God, that is, His Torah. The message is very simple: when the Jewish people do not follow God’s commandments, when they worship idols and commit other abominations, the Almighty suspends His protection, and the Jewish people—who were never known for their military power—are at the mercy of their ruthless enemies and consequently suffer invasions, destruction, and exile.

EXCHANGING A NATURAL SPRING FOR A POROUS CISTERN

The first of the three Haftarot, which we read last week, is from the first chapter of the Book of Jeremiah (Dibré Yirmiyahu) and deals with his initiation into prophecy and his delicate mission to warn Israel about the consequences of their actions. The Haftarah corresponding to this week’s Torah portion, Mattot-Mas’e, is the second of the three special Haftarot. The prophet Jeremiah criticizes Israel for abandoning God and being ungrateful to Him, forgetting that Hashem took us out of slavery, protected us from the dangers of the desert, and led us to a land of abundance.

Jeremiah expresses shock and indignation at the behavior of Israel and says with sorrow that if one were to search in all corners of the planet, it would be difficult to find a nation so foolish and senseless. To exemplify the behavior of our people, Jeremiah uses a profound metaphor: a town has a beautiful spring of fresh and abundant water. This natural source continuously produces water and doesn’t even require maintenance. The people of this town are truly privileged: unlike all other cities, they do not depend on collecting rainwater for their survival because the freshwater source provides them with everything they need for their well-being and prosperity. Jeremiah implies that Hashem, God, is to Israel what the water source is to that privileged people: their abundant privileged source of life. But inexplicably, the people of that town abandon the water spring, turn their backs on it, and to obtain water; they dig cisterns with their own hands! These artificial wells do not have their own water; they are completely dry when it doesn’t rain and cannot even retain the water they absorb from rain because they are full of cracks. Who would conceive of abandoning a natural water spring and seeking to collect the precious liquid in broken cisterns?

This is the powerful message of Jeremiah’s text. Abandoning God, the source of physical and spiritual life for Israel is not only a betrayal of our covenant with God but also an act of foolishness, a shame for anyone who considers themselves intelligent. And, of course, it is also “offensive and humiliating to the Abandoned Spring,” that is, God, who has been “replaced” by His own nation and replaced with false idols that the Yehudim have made with their own hands.

WHO WILL HELP US NOW?

Although the rabbis added some additional verses to conclude the Haftarah with a positive and hopeful message, towards the end of this text, we find a verse with a harsh but very relevant lesson that, unfortunately, we still need to learn. On the one hand, the people of Israel abandoned God, betrayed Him, turned their backs on Him, and sought false gods. But, surprise! When the Jews have to face difficult times and imminent tragedies, they finally realize that the gods of Egypt, Assyria, and other nations were only clay and wood. And only then, when no one else can help them, they remember God, pray to Him, and plead: “Please, Hashem, save us, rescue us!” (Jeremiah 2:27 כִּֽי־פָנ֥וּ אֵלַ֛י עֹ֖רֶף וְלֹ֣א פָנִ֑ים וּבְעֵ֤ת רָעָתָם֙ יֹֽאמְר֔וּ ק֖וּמָה וְהוֹשִׁיעֵֽנוּ).

If we look for a relevant lesson for the present in this Haftarah, perhaps this is the most fitting one. In difficult times when we are desperate because no one else can help us, only then do we remember God, pray to Him, and say, “Please, help us.” And when we are fine, we forget about our Creator, abandon His commandments, and don’t even thank Him for His continuous and abundant blessings.

Rabbi Yosef Bitton




The Twelve Days war by Numbers

The spokesperson for the Israeli army revealed the numerical data behind the military operation against Iran:

Attacks

1,500 Air Force sorties and 600 aerial refuelings.

1,400 attacks carried out by fighter jets and 500 drone strikes.

The furthest attack: in Mashhad, at a distance of 2,400 km, carried out by a fighter jet.

Strategic Eliminations

11 high-ranking nuclear scientists were eliminated.

More than 30 senior officials of Iran’s defense system were eliminated.

Hundreds of soldiers from the Iranian military forces were eliminated.

Nuclear Program

3 nuclear sites were attacked: Isfahan, Natanz, and Fordow.

Thousands of centrifuges (intended for uranium enrichment) were destroyed.

Nuclear research and development centers were destroyed.

Military Infrastructure and Weaponry

15 enemy aircraft were destroyed.

80 surface-to-air launchers (air defense systems) were destroyed.

200 ballistic missile launchers were destroyed (50% of all Iranian launchers).

35 missile production factories were attacked.

6 airports were attacked.

Interceptions and Defense

86% success in intercepting ballistic missiles (Iran fired hundreds of missiles, which could potentially have killed thousands of Israelis).

99% success in intercepting drones (Iran launched approximately one thousand).




KORACH: How Do You Measure Victory in the Middle East?

The conflict between Israel and Iran is not over yet. We are currently in a ceasefire after an overwhelming Israeli victory in the “Twelve-Day War,” a conflict in which Israel succeeded, at the highest possible level, in achieving its objectives: destroying Iran’s nuclear program and neutralizing its ballistic missiles.

Israel also demonstrated the incredible capability of its air force, which, within just a few hours, gained total control of Tehran’s skies. The Jewish Air Force proved to be unmatched by any other air force in the region. Israel also used its missile and drone defense systems with considerable effectiveness. It showed the incredible logistical and emotional preparedness and discipline of the Jewish State regarding its shelters—better than any other country in the world—and its citizens’ training to mobilize immediately upon hearing sirens and alarms. This readiness has saved thousands of lives that could have been victims of Iranian missiles.

It has been an incredible victory for Israel, and Iran knows it. The world knows it, too. There are still post-war negotiations between the U.S. and Iran to ensure that Iran does not continue its nuclear programs or missile production.

What else needs to happen now?

Suppose we visualize the most optimistic scenario of this story, which is still unfolding. In that case, some suggest an expansion of the Abraham Accords, potentially including countries such as Oman, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and even Syria and Lebanon.

This week, giant billboards appeared in Tel Aviv showing Trump, Netanyahu, and Arab leaders promoting normalization with Israel under the slogan of the “Abraham Alliance” (see image above).

But until these messianic images crystallize, we must be realistic. First and foremost, we must recognize all variants of enemies: perhaps peace agreements can be signed with moderate Muslim states, such as Bahrain or the Emirates, but it is extremely dangerous to make agreements with Islamic or Islamized states. Because a state or an Islamic organization—such as Iran, the Houthis, Hezbollah, Hamas, or Al Qaeda—will not abandon their objective of destroying Israel. In any hypothetical “peace agreement,” they will use the strategy of taqiya, the religiously permitted lie in Islam, for political and military purposes. That is, to sign a peace agreement today with the hidden intention of attacking tomorrow.

If we forget this, then we have not learned the lessons of October 7.

Israel handed over Gaza to Hamas, free of Jewish presence. During those 20 years of supposed “peace,” Israel helped as much as it could to rebuild and benefit the inhabitants of Gaza. It yielded and looked the other way (hajalá) in the face of provocations from Gazans. Meanwhile, Hamas, instead of building their state with unlimited resources at their disposal, armed itself to the teeth, dug tunnels, and meticulously planned the massacre of 2023. We cannot allow ourselves to fall into the same trap again.

How can we avoid repeating this terror?

From the perspective of Judaism—and also of Israel’s modern situation—there is a fundamental teaching: the least Jewish word in the dictionary is “akhshav,” ( עכשיו ) “now,” as in the phrase “Peace Now” or “Hostages Now.” That mentality of resolving an immediate problem and leaving the consequences for our grandchildren is not part of the Jewish vision. Our patriarch Yaacob acquired the birthright from his brother Esav, a future blessing, which Esav sacrificed for a bowl of lentils NOW. That scene is not just a historical account; it is a warning. The Jew knows very well that there is nothing worse than sacrificing the future for immediate benefit. Even more so when those benefits come from political actors of very dubious reputation.

In any peace agreement that is signed, especially with its immediate neighbors, Israel cannot repeat the mistake of negotiating “land for peace.” The land conquered since October 7 in Lebanon, Syria, and Gaza is not only a strategic guarantee, a security zone, a demilitarized strip CONTROLLED BY ISRAEL that keeps our enemies away from our borders and makes them less dangerous.

The land conquered by Israel is mainly the best insurance policy to prevent future hostilities. It is the most significant punishment for the perpetrators of the October 7 attack and their allies, which may deter them from committing the same mistake again.

Anwar Sadat cynically boasted that he gave Begin what he wanted most: a signed paper, and in exchange, he obtained what he wanted most: the land of Sinai. The documents signed today could be violated tomorrow, especially when governments change in the Arab signatory countries or even in the governments of those countries guaranteeing such agreements. But land does not change. It does not move. It remains there. It functions as a security buffer, essential for the defense of Israeli territory.

If there is going to be a peace settlement, let it be “paper for paper.” And let the land, conquered with the blood of our young soldiers, remain untouched. As it was in the days of Yehoshua Bin Nun, land obtained is consecrated land; it is not negotiable.

IN THE MIDDLE EAST, VICTORY IS MEASURED BY THE LAND GAINED IN BATTLE. AND DEFEAT BY THE LAND LOST.

We owe it to our grandchildren and to the brave soldiers of Israel who gave their lives to conquer it.

כָּל־הַמָּקוֹם אֲשֶׁר תִּדְרְכוּ כַף־רַגְלְכֶם בּוֹ לָכֶם יִהְיֶה
מִן־הַמִּדְבָּר וְהַלְּבָנוֹן מִן־הַנָּהָר נְהַר פְּרָת וְעַד הַיָּם הָאַחֲרוֹן יִהְיֶה גְּבֻלְכֶם׃

Every place that the sole of your foot will step upon [=that you conquer] will be yours; from the desert [of the Negev in the south] and to Lebanon, from the Euphrates River to the western sea [the Mediterranean], will be your territory.

Debarim 11:24




KORACH: The Story Of Two Influencers

2025

THE MYSTERY OF ON

On Ben Pelet is a mysterious character in the Tora. Practically nothing is known about him. This week’s Parasha mentions him in the context of Korach’s rebellion: On is a leader from the tribe of Reuben who joins Korach to question Moshe’s political role. After they present their case against Moshe, the anti-Moshe coalition prepares for the next day: in the morning it will be decided – providentially – who is the true leader of Israel. The next day, the Divine Presence reveals itself, confirming Moshe’s designation. Korach, his henchmen, and his followers were punished and lost their lives. The Tora lists those who died in the insurrection, but On Ben Pelet is not mentioned among the dead. Why? What happened to On?

WHY and MORE WHY

One of the most special elements of biblical narrative is that the Tora tells us what the characters said or did in the story, but almost never clarifies why they acted the way they did. Why did Cain kill Abel? Why did the spies refuse to continue into Israel and demoralize the people? In these and many other cases, the text remains silent. It is the Sages of the Talmud or the Midrash who fill these textual gaps with interpretations – historical or allegorical – philosophical ideas or grammatical deductions. And with great humility, they always leave space open for other ideas and opinions. Thus, the Tora always has more to offer. And in every generation it invites “the reader” to become “the writer” and discover a new interpretation of the text.

INFLUENCERS

The Sages explain that behind Korach’s rebellion was his wife. It was she who, out of ambition, jealousy, and envy, pressured him to rise up against Moshe. She not only supported his rebellious thoughts but incited him day after day. She filled his head with words that fed his resentment and pride, making him feel that Moshe and Aharon had taken from him what he deserved. According to the Midrashim, this influencer told him it wasn’t fair that his cousin held all the power and that he, being equally important and from a prestigious lineage, had no leadership role. She awakened in him the desire for greatness until Korach could no longer see reality clearly. The ambition she cultivated in him was what ultimately led to his downfall.

In contrast, the Midrash recounts that On Ben Pelet was saved by his wife. After Korach and his followers confronted Moshe, On returned home and told his wife that the next day the leadership issue would be resolved and that he would try to become one of the leaders of the people. But his wife was unimpressed by the possibility of political prestige. She acted with intelligence and common sense. When her husband expressed his plans, she discouraged him from going against Moshe. This influencer acted not only with common sense but with great strategy. First, she convinced him that regardless of who would be the next leader to replace Moshe, he would still remain in a secondary position. His role would not change, and Korach just wanted to use him.

THE STRATEGY OF ON’S WIFE

Although On agreed with his wife, he told her he still had to be there because he had already committed himself to Korach and his friends. His wife, seeing that On was determined to continue with his plan, said nothing but decided to take matters into her own hands.

What did On’s wife do? Surely that night, she kept him awake as long as possible. And before he went to sleep, she gave him very strong wine, which made him sleep longer than usual. In the morning, when his friends came to get him and wanted to enter the house to wake him up, On’s wife deliberately let her hair down – something a married Jewish woman only does in front of her husband – and out of modesty, On’s friends stayed waiting outside. They asked his wife to wake him up.

I imagine they must have shouted to her from outside the tent, telling her it was already late and the uprising was about to begin. And she must have responded: “Don’t worry. You go ahead; I will wake my husband and he will join you shortly.” And so she managed to keep her husband asleep for a couple more hours: just enough time for the tragic rebellion to end. Thus, with great intelligence and feminine influence, she saved her husband’s life.

Korach’s wife fed her husband’s ambition to rebel against Moshe and led him to his destruction, while On’s wife used all her intelligence, charm, and influence to save him from ruin. And she succeeded!

 

 

2020

THE MYSTERY OF ON

On Ben Pelet is a mysterious character. Virtually nothing is known about him. This week’s Parasha mentions him in the context of the Korach rebellion: He is a leader of the tribe of Reuben who, along with Korach, questions the political role of Moshe. After they present their case against Moshe, this anti-Moshe coalition (רק לא משה) prepares for the next day: in the morning, it will be decided – in a Providential way – who the real leader of Israel is. The next day, the Divine Presence confirms Moshe’s appointment. And Korach, his accomplices, and his followers were severely punished and lost their lives. The Tora names those who perished in the insurrection. But On Ben Pelet is not mentioned among the deceased. Why? What happened to On?

WE DO NOT KNOW WHY 

One of the most special characteristics of the biblical narrative is that the Tora tells us what the characters in the story said or did, but it almost never mentions “why” individuals acted the way they acted: Why did Cain kill Abel? Why did the spies reject Israel and demoralize the people? On these and many other occasions, the text remains silent regarding the “why”. The Sages of the usually come to the rescue and fill these textual gaps with novel interpretations – historical or allegorical- philosophical ideas or grammatical insight. And with great humility, they said there is always room for new ideas and opinions. And this is how in every generation, we “the readers” are invited to become “the writers,” discovering new hidden angles of the text.

A SIXTH SENSE

Going back to On Ben Pelet, the Midrash says that On was saved by his wife. After Korach confronted Moshe, On Ben Pelet returned to his house and told his wife that the next morning the matter of leadership would be resolved, and he would try to become one of the heads of the community. On’s wife was not carried away by the ambition of political prestige. Incidentally, the Sages also said that Korach’s wife , out of envy and personal ambition, was the one who pushed her husband to accuse Moshe of nepotism and usurpation of power. She convinced Korach to do everything possible to replace him. On’s wife, on the other hand, acted in the opposite way. She discouraged her husband from going against Moshe. On’s wife proceeded, not only with common sense but also with great intelligence. When her husband told her of his plan, she strategically explained to him that no matter the first leader, he would remain in second place. His case was a lost cause.

ON’S WIFE STRATEGY

Her husband agreed. However, he said he still needed to be present because he gave his word to Korach and his friends…. Seeing that On was determined to go ahead with his plan, the wife said nothing to him, but she decided to take matters into her own hands. What did On’s wife do? That night, she kept him awake for as long as possible. And before going to sleep, she gave him a very strong wine to drink, which made him sleep more than usual. In the morning, when his friends came looking for him and wanted to go into his house to wake him up On’s wife deliberately let her hair down –something a married Jewish woman only does in front of her husband– and On’s friends had to wait outside *. At that moment, they must have asked the wife, shouting from outside the tent, to wake On up, that it was already late, that the riots were about to begin. And she must have told them: “Don’t worry! You go ahead, and I will wake my husband right away. He will meet you there promptly”. She managed to keep her husband asleep for a couple of hours until the end of the mutiny. And thus, with intelligence and feminine intuition, she saved her husband.

While Korach’s wife encouraged her spouse to rebel against Moshe, leading her husband and her entire household to destruction, On Ben Pelet’s wife used all her intelligence, her charm, and every trick in the book to save his life!

 

I vividly remember watching an episode of the TV show Little House on the Prairie many decades ago. In this particular episode, “The Handyman” (Season 4, Episode 4), which originally aired in 1977, a man approached the Ingalls’ house. Caroline, Michael’s wife, was the only one at home as her husband was away. Unlike her usual practice of tying her hair back, Mrs. Ingalls had her hair loosely flowing – it was the first time she was seen with her hair down. Upon seeing her, the man commented on her hair and made her feel uncomfortable. This scene would serve as an incredible illustration of a part of our story.





KORACH: Four Words That Can Save Your Life

It is not enough just to learn the meaning of this verse (pasuq). I would recommend that you memorize it. Or print it out and keep it in your desk, purse, or wallet. It is a very short pasuq, which belongs to the Parasha that we will read in a few weeks (Pinehas), but it refers to what happened in our week’s Parasha KORACH. The pasuq consists of only 4 simple words. “UBNE QORAH LO METU”. Which literally means “And the sons of Korach did not die.” i.e., they survived.

What does this short text refer to?

CHILDREN vs FATHER

Carried away by his ambition, envy and bad advice, Korach decided to rebel against Moshe and Aharon and removed them from their leadership. Korach was not alone . More than 250 people accompanied him on his rebellious adventure. The end of Korach was horrifying: he died swallowed by the earth. And the people who were with Korach suffered the same fate. However, as this pasuq mentions, the children of Korach were the exception: they survived! Why? The sons of Korach, who were already adults, joined the movement led by their father and participated in the protests and demonstrations against Moshe. However, “at the last minute,” when the time came for the final showdown against Moshe, they woke up. Realizing that what they were about to do was an act of insanity and that if they didn’t back down “right now”, the damage was going to be irreparable! Korach’s children survived because they repented just in time, in the final minute.

And I think about the moral challenges that all of us experience daily.

ANGER MANAGEMENT

Sometimes we get carried away by anger and we may be about to raise our hands and physically harm someone or seriously offend or insult someone with damaging words. Sometimes these impulsive acts of physical or extreme verbal violence can have irreversible consequences no just for the victim but also for the offender. In one impulsive act that lasts less than a minute one can condemn himself or herself to suffer the consequences of what he did for the rest of his life.

LETHAL ATTRACTION

Other times we let ourselves be carried away by our passions and low instincts. We get emotionally close to someone we should not … our common sense is clouded and so, in a brief moment, we might let ourselves be dragged into an instinctive act and we can ruin our name and that of our children, and destroy our family.

THINK BEFORE YOU TWEET

Sometimes we are about to send a text that we write while angry, where we express or unwind from our own frustration. We do it more to vent out than to convey a message to others. And perhaps we do not measure or calculate the consequences of what we sent. There are famous cases of political personalities or celebrities who lost their jobs due to an impulsive Twitter that, once sent and seen by one single follower, they were never able to make disappear. You can ruin your life (and or someone else’s life) via WhatsApp, Twitter or Instagram, just by sending an inappropriate picture.

Sometimes, we might not realize the seriousness and irreparability of sending a wrong “text” or a “picture” because unconsciously we assume that acts that carry far-reaching negative consequences are very difficult to execute…. and clicking “send”, seems so easy!

THE LAST RESOURCE

The odd thing is that in many, if not most, famous cases of people who sent an inappropriate Twit for example, the sender realizes his or her mistake a few seconds AFTER sending the message!

We must remember that our names and reputation can be saved by remembering the lesson of this pasuq “AND THE CHILDREN OF KORACH SURVIVED”, that’s is, they saved their lives because they realize the potential consequences of their actions a brief moment BEFORE the facts. They backed off and were saved.

I recommend memorizing these four little words and if ח”ו you are about to fall into the destructive trap of your own impulses, say this Pasuq to yourself and remember “the last minute wisdom” that saved the lives of the children of Korach and that can save yours.

וּבְנֵי־קֹרַח לֹא־מֵתוּ
UBNE QORAH LO METU

But the children of Korach, survived!




Who Needs Bomb-Shelters?




SHELACH LEKHA: The Locust Generation

The psychological defeatism of the generation of the desert is also reflected in a detail I hadn’t noticed for many years: the spies saw themselves as tiny as insects—but why didn’t they describe themselves as ants, bees, or wasps, insects that the Tora mentions in other contexts? Why did the spies use locusts as a metaphor?

It occurred to me that they compared themselves to locusts because locusts have no sting—in other words, they cannot defend themselves or protect their colony. In a certain way, and quite subtly, they were admitting their numerical strength—let’s remember that the devastating effect of locusts happens only when they arrive in swarms of millions. Still, individual locusts are entirely harmless and vulnerable.

The men of the generation of the desert, Freud might say, saw themselves as locusts because they believed they were incapable of defending themselves—let alone achieving victory!

If we want to analyze it even more subtly, according to the culinary culture of the time, locusts were edible (many species are kosher), and unconsciously, they were describing themselves as food for the enemy.

Caleb and Yehoshua, on the other hand, presented the opposite view when they said, “Lachmenu hem”—the enemy is our bread—meaning: “they’re a piece of cake.”




SHELACH LEKHA: From the Desert Generation to the Generation of Victory

דור הנצחון                                                  דור המדבר

 

The Jewish people were in the desert, just days away from reaching the Promised Land. God instructed Moshe to send twelve men, leaders of the tribes, to scout the territory of Israel and plan the most effective way to conquer it. The spies returned from their mission and showed the people the fruits of the land of Canaan. Everyone was delighted.

But what followed was inconceivable and unexpected: ten of the twelve scouts expressed total pessimism about the possibility of conquering the land flowing with milk and honey: LO NUKHAL. “We will not be able to conquer it! The inhabitants are too strong. They are giants. We are small and insignificant—like grasshoppers. We won’t make it!”

Yehoshua and Caleb, two of the scouts, tried to reason with the people and presented more or less the following arguments: “We are not just any nation. We are the people of God. Have you already forgotten who brought us out of Egypt just a year ago? Do you remember the ten plagues? Don’t you realize that God is guiding us and will help us conquer the land? Do not be afraid! ALO NA’ALE! We will succeed in conquering it!”

TISHA BEAV

The story ended badly. The people cried, screamed, and protested against Moshe and Aharon. Yehoshua and Caleb tried to calm them, but the crowd refused to listen and nearly stoned them. God had to intervene directly to prevent a collective uprising. There were casualties. God punished that generation in the worst possible way—karma: they would wander in the desert—as they wanted—until they vanished and were replaced by the next generation.

For years, I wondered what led the ten spies to be so pessimistic. The Torah, true to its style, leaves this question open to interpretation. I read a lot about this episode. At first, I couldn’t understand how they became paralyzed by fear. It was illogical. And not only because HaShem was with them. Even from a practical, pragmatic point of view—without relying on miracles—they had everything in their favor! The Israelite army had 600,000 soldiers: huge, even by today’s standards! In the Book of Yehoshua, we see that the Canaanite peoples had populations of 20,000, 30,000, or 50,000, and in fact, they were afraid of Israel.

And if they weren’t going to fight to conquer the Land of Israel—what was the plan B? Return to Egypt? Stay in the desert?

The idea of doing nothing was suicidal.

I’m convinced that the problem wasn’t ideological or military—it was psychological. The spies were part of the Generation of the Desert, and most of them—as shown by the proportion of 10 out of 12—suffered from a slave mentality and inferiority complex. The fear and panic of confronting another person—something they had been conditioned not to do—overcame them and paralyzed them. During the 210 years we were enslaved in Egypt, our mindset changed. The generation of the desert grew up with the conviction that they could not—and should not—defend themselves. And they were never able to overcome that.

GENERATIONAL SHIFT

Until 1948, the Jewish people lived in captivity—the Galut, or Diaspora—which lasted 1,900 years! In exile, we were subjected to all kinds of persecution, abuse, and subjugation. We lived on borrowed time and space. We had to apologize for our existence. We tried to stay invisible in order to survive. It was forbidden to draw attention to ourselves. We got used to not disturbing anyone. We had no rights, and it never occurred to us to demand them. That mentality of 2,000 years of exile became part of our character—and some still haven’t let go of it. Outside of Israel, and even within Israel, many still suffer from this defeatist mindset or inferiority complex that leads us to always see the enemy as stronger. Or the other is better. Or more righteous than us.

These past few days, like all of you, I’ve been glued to the news from Israel. And among other things, I heard analysts explain why Israel didn’t attack Iran 20 or 30 years ago—when it was much easier and far less dangerous. The answer I kept hearing was always the same: fear. Fear, because despite having a powerful army, we still saw ourselves as grasshoppers. Or fear that something might go wrong. Fear of Iran’s reaction, and especially fear of the world’s response: “What will they say?” That fear was paralyzing. That fear, in the long term, was suicidal.

TRANSFORMATIONAL TRAUMA

I believe that October 7 was, for many Jews, a transformational trauma. We were forced to realize that if we don’t defend ourselves, no one else will.

Prime Minister Netanyahu also transformed. He woke up—or became much braver—and showed that he had overcome his Galut-fear. Israel invaded Gaza, something it had feared doing for twenty years. To me, that invasion was the turning point. From that moment, under Netanyahu’s leadership, Israel—for the first time in its history—was not afraid of the demonization it always faces in the media: false accusations of killing Palestinian children, of deliberate genocide, of attacking hospitals, etc. In the past, fear of global public demonization paralyzed us. It made us retreat—surrendering wars we had won. Hamas counted on our terror of “what the world will say.”

FROM GAZA TO IRAN

For the first time in many years, Israel was not paralyzed by fear of global opinion. We realized we would not change it anyway. We saw that the anti-Israel protests began on October 8! While we were still bleeding—long before we even started to defend ourselves! The October 7 massacre changed us. The future of our children mattered more than international criticism. And we invaded Gaza. We dared to withstand the criticism of literally EVERY nation on Earth. Those were mentally epic days! Later, Netanyahu also dared to act with enormous chutzpah, committing an unprecedented act of insubordination: disobeying a direct order from the United States. When Biden told him “DON’T” and forbade him from advancing into Rafiah—threatening to cut off weapons supplies—Netanyahu became a lion who refused to be intimidated. And to the world’s surprise, he charged forward. And so did our soldiers, inspired by unmatched bravery.

Then came the deliberation over attacking Hezbollah. The leaders of the desert generation—politicians, journalists, and ex-generals who appear daily on Channels 11, 12, and 13—all said: LO NUKHLAL, “We can’t do it” ” They kept warning against attacking Hezbollah, saying there would be tens of thousands of casualties.

And then Netanyahu gave the order to the Mossad to carry out Operation BEEPERS—the boldest intelligence mission in history.

Then we moved on to Syria, where Israel preemptively destroyed the entire military infrastructure, even capturing territory and declaring that it would not be returned.

October 7 marked –or produced– the generational shift.

We went from being the Generation of the Desert—Dor haMidbar—to becoming the Generation of Victory—Dor haNitsachon. The generation that lost its fear. That fought, conquered, and defended the Land of Israel.

These are historic days because of the events we are witnessing—the elimination of the nuclear threat from Iran. And they are biblical times because we have become the generation of Yehoshua and Caleb.

YEHOSHUA STRIKES BACK

That new generation—very soon, after the war—will also replace the desert generation in the political sphere.

And we will live in a safer State of Israel, less apologetic, less self-doubting, and more proud of its Jewish identity.

Today, with the faith and courage of Yehoshua and Caleb, we can bring their words to life when they said:

“…to the entire congregation of the children of Israel: ‘The land we passed through to scout is exceedingly good. If God desires us, He will bring us to this land and give it to us—a land flowing with milk and honey. Do not rebel against God, and do not fear the people of the land, for they are like bread to us… God is with us. Do not be afraid!'” (Bemidbar 14:8–10)

 

וַיֹּאמְרוּ אֶל כָּל עֲדַת בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל לֵאמֹר הָאָרֶץ אֲשֶׁר עָבַרְנוּ בָהּ לָתוּר אֹתָהּ טוֹבָה הָאָרֶץ מְאֹד מְאֹד
אִם חָפֵץ בָּנוּ ה׳ וְהֵבִיא אֹתָנוּ אֶל הָאָרֶץ הַזֹּאת וּנְתָנָהּ לָנוּ אֶרֶץ אֲשֶׁר הִוא זָבַת חָלָב וּדְבָשׁ
אַךְ בַּה׳ אַל תִּמְרֹדוּ וְאַתֶּם אַל תִּירְאוּ אֶת עַם הָאָרֶץ כִּי לַחְמֵנוּ הֵם סָר צִלָּם מֵעֲלֵיהֶם וַה׳ אִתָּנוּ אַל תִּירָאֻם




How to Calculate Shiva, Sheloshim, the 11 Months, and the Year (Sal)

Every count begins from the day of burial, not the day of death. Because we bury during the day, the burial day itself is day one of every count. Keep the Hebrew date of the burial in front of you. In the first year, every calculation starts there.

To move between Hebrew and civil dates, use the Hebcal converter: https://www.hebcal.com/converter

Example. A person dies during the day on Monday, 22 Iyar (May 30, 2026), and is buried the next morning on Tuesday, 23 Iyar (May 31, 2026). Every calculation below follows from the burial date, 23 Iyar.

Shiva

Seven days from burial. The burial day is day one. In our example, Shiva runs from Tuesday, 23 Iyar, and ends on the morning of the seventh day, 29 Iyar (Monday, June 6, 2026). The Haft will be Sunday night, June 5th.

A festival that falls during Shiva or Sheloshim can cancel or shorten the count, and the calculation differs for each holiday. For those cases, see Mourning and Festivities  .

Sheloshim

Thirty days from burial, the burial day counting as day one. The thirtieth day is the end of Sheloshim. In our example, Sheloshim ends on 23 Sivan (Wednesday, June 29, 2026). Relatives say kaddish through Sheloshim, and may continue saying kaddish during the year when they are at a minyan.

NOTE: When the burial month has twenty‑nine days, Sheloshim falls on the same date number in the next month (23 Iyar to 23 Sivan). When the burial month has thirty days, it falls one number earlier. Because some months vary in length, confirm the date with the Hebrw Calendar converter.

The 11 Months (Son’s Kaddish)

The sons of the deceased say kaddish for eleven months. Eleven months from burial lands on the same date number eleven months later, which is one month before the first anniversary. In our example, eleven months from 23 Iyar is 23 Nisan (April 19, 2027). The last kaddish at that point is said at Mincha.

According to the Mashadi tradition, the children then pause for about three weeks and resume kaddish about a week before the anniversary, on 16 Iyar (from Arvit on Thursday night, May 11, 2027), continuing until the anniversary itself, 23 Iyar (Friday, May 19, 2027), with the last kaddish at Mincha. The pause keeps the kaddish from appearing to be a full twelve months, while still honoring the days leading up to the sal.

The Year (Sal)

The sal is the yearly anniversary.

First year: the sal follows the date of burial. In our example, the first sal is 23 Iyar 5777.

Following years: the sal follows the date of death, not the burial. In our example, from the second year on, the sal is 22 Iyar. The relatives begin saying kaddish before the sal (in the example, from Friday night, 20 Iyar 5788, May 4, 2028) and continue through the sal itself, 22 Iyar 5788 (Monday, May 7, 2028), with the last kaddish at Mincha.

Leap Years

In a Jewish leap year there are two months of Adar, Adar I and Adar II. This affects the counts in two ways. First, when a count of thirty days or eleven months passes through a leap year, include both Adars, because the year has thirteen months. Second, when the anniversary date falls in Adar: a date from Adar I stays in Adar I, a date from Adar II stays in Adar II, and a date from a regular single Adar is observed in Adar II of the leap year. These cases are easy to miscalculate. Confirm the date with the converter (https://www.hebcal.com/converter), and when in doubt, ask before fixing the date.

Visiting the Cemetery

It is customary to visit on the day of Shiva, the day of Sheloshim, at the eleven months, and every year on the sal. It is also customary to visit each year on Tisha Be’av and before Rosh Hashana or Yom Kippur. Apart from these days, it is best not to visit regularly.

We do not visit on Chol Hamoed, or Rosh Chodesh. If the last day of Shiva falls on one of these, the mourners visit afterward. If the last day of Sheloshim or the sal falls on one of these, the mourners visit either before or after.




Eliyahu Montalto (1567–1616), physician to the King of France

I am writing the second volume of my book “Forgotten Giants”, in which I recount the history of lesser-known Sephardic rabbis (see here). This volume focuses on rabbinic leaders after the expulsion from Spain, mainly from the 17th century. While writing about Rabbi Shaul Levi Mortera, chief rabbi of Amsterdam, in the early 1600s, I came across a name I did not know: Rabbi and Doctor Eliyahu Montalto. His story is fascinating, and I’ve been reading about him for several days. Today, I decided to write about him and share his incredible biography with you. I feel that remembering his example is both a source of inspiration and an act of justice—Tehiyat HaMetim: reviving and rescuing from oblivion the memory of our forgotten Jewish heroes.

May the meritorious acts of our ancestors inspire us to love God and our Torah, to value our present religious freedom—which we take for granted—and especially the privilege of having our own Jewish State, Medinat Israel!

Enjoy the reading!

 

 

FROM PORTUGAL TO PISA

Eliyahu de Luna Montalto was born around the year 1567 in the city of Castelo Branco in the Kingdom of Portugal. He was the son of Antonio and Catarina Aires, who were anusim, Jews forced to convert to Christianity. He was officially baptized as Felipe.

He studied medicine at the University of Salamanca and later at Coimbra in Portugal. He settled in Lisbon as a physician, where he married Jerónima de Fonseca, the daughter of a family also forced to convert to Christianity in Portugal in 1497.

In 1593, he moved to Livorno, which offered residence and professional freedom to Jews and conversos from Spain and Portugal. There, he began to practice medicine professionally, and his wisdom was such that his reputation grew rapidly.

In 1606, he published his first medical treatise, Optica intra philosophiae et medicinae aream, a scientific work on visual processes in which he combined medical observations with philosophical and biblical references. For example, he developed an innovative theory claiming that vision originates in the brain—not in the eyes—based on a literal reading of Exodus 20:18: “All the people saw the voices.”

During the same period, he taught medicine at the University of Pisa, where he was considered for the highest chair in the medical faculty. Little by little, as he reconnected in Livorno with his Jewish origins, he moved toward a more spiritual life. As a first step, he changed his original name, Felipe (which means “friend of horses”), to Filoteo (which means “friend of God”).

IN THE VENICE GHETTO

In 1607, Dr. Montalto made the most critical decision of his life: he left Pisa and moved to the Venice Ghetto, where he renounced his Christian identity and began openly practicing Judaism. He was welcomed by the Jewish community, which had around 6,000 members, many of whom lived in poverty and desperately needed a good doctor. In Venice, he adopted the Hebrew name “Eliyahu,” and his wife, Jerónima, took the name Rahel. From then on, he lived fully as a practicing Jew. His first mentor or influencer was Daniel Franco, who was eventually burned at the stake in an auto-da-fé for his Jewish faith upon returning to Portugal.

While in Venice, Montalto studied Halakha (Jewish law) and Jewish philosophy while continuing to practice medicine. His teacher was the famous Rabbi Yehuda Aryeh de Modena (1571–1648). Montalto actively participated in the ghetto’s life and was part of the community’s leadership. His tomb refers to him as “Rab” (rabbi), which suggests that at some point, he officially received that title in Venice.

His high cultural level and deep knowledge of Christianity allowed him to debate non-Jews on an equal cultural background with solid arguments.

In 1612, he represented the Jewish community in a public debate in Padua against a Dominican friar. The friar’s unexpected withdrawal from the debate solidified Montalto’s reputation as a polemicist and defender of Judaism.

COURT PHYSICIAN IN PARIS

Years earlier, in 1605, Montalto had passed through Paris on his way back from the Netherlands. There, he was summoned by the royal court to treat Leonora Galigai, lady-in-waiting and childhood friend of Maria de Medici, wife of King Henry IV of France. Galigai suffered from what was then diagnosed as bulbus hystericus, a psychosomatic disorder. At the time, mental illnesses were usually treated by Christian clergy through exorcisms since such conditions were believed to be caused by demonic possession.

Rabbi Montalto treated the patient using a professional medical approach. He prescribed Galigai a regimen of diet, fresh air, walks, exercise, and abstinence. According to experts George M. Weisz and Donatella Lippi, this method could today be considered an early form of psychotherapy—and it was revolutionary for its time. Over time, the patient improved significantly, and Dr. Montalto’s reputation grew further. His fame spread, and many expected him to be appointed as the official physician of the Parisian court.

However, King Henry IV of France strongly opposed his formal appointment because Montalto was Jewish. Although the king respected him for his knowledge and accomplishments, he would not allow him to remain at court.

After the assassination of Henry IV in 1610, Queen Maria de Medici—now regent of the young Louis XIII—summoned him again to Paris. In a letter dated May 6, 1611, Montalto clearly stated the conditions under which he would accept the position:

  • Papal permission to reside in France as a Jew and to practice Judaism openly
  • Authorization to bring ten Jews with him to ensure a daily minyan, including a shochet
  • Exemption from working on Shabbat
  • The right to freely practice his religion and eat kosher food for himself and his companions

It was the first time someone of his stature had dared to present such a request, which was unprecedented in Renaissance Europe.

To the surprise of many, these bold and historically unparalleled conditions were accepted by Queen Maria de Medici. Thanks to her family’s connections with the Vatican, the Pope, Camillo Borghese, issued a dispensation (heter) allowing Montalto to practice Judaism in France. In September 1612, Montalto was officially appointed Consiliarus et Medicus—Counselor and Physician—to the royal court. He became the first Jew to publicly—and notably—practice his faith in Paris since the expulsion of the Jews from France in 1394. Among the ten Jews who accompanied him from Venice was his student and assistant, Shaul Levi Mortera.

DEFENDER OF THE JEWS

During his time at court, Montalto protected converso Jews, who were constantly attacked and discriminated against. In 1615, he prevented the dissolution of the community of conversos in Bordeaux and intervened to stop the expulsion of several conversos who were caught celebrating the Pesach Seder in Paris.

In 1614, he published his second medical work in Paris: Archipathologia, dedicated to Maria de Medici. This psychological treatise of 817 pages addresses 18 types of mental and neurological disorders, including melancholy, epilepsy, insomnia, vertigo, and coma.

DEATH AND BURIAL

In November 1615, Montalto accompanied the royal family on their journey to Spain for the wedding of Louis XIII to Anne of Austria. On the return trip to France, as they approached the town of Tours, Montalto contracted a plague and passed away. It was February 17, 1616—29 Shebat, 5376.

France had no Jewish cemetery at the time, and in his will, Montalto requested that his body be taken to Amsterdam, where his children lived, to be buried in the Jewish cemetery of Beth Haim. Queen Maria de Medici ordered his body to be embalmed—an exceptional measure—and personally funded its transfer.

His son, Moshe de Luna Montalto, and his disciple, Rabbi Shaul Levi Mortera, accompanied his body on the funeral journey to the Jewish cemetery in Amsterdam.

HIS JEWISH WRITINGS

Rabbi Montalto wrote two polemical treatises in defense of Judaism, responding to Christian attacks. The first was a Portuguese treatise on Isaiah 53, the chapter that describes the “faithful servant of God” who suffers persecution and pain because of his devotion to God. Rabbinic literature has always taught that this “Servant of God” refers to the people of Israel, while the Church interpreted it as referring to Yeshu.

When presenting the Jewish arguments, Rabbi Montalto was not only refuting the Christian reading but also seeking to educate the conversos—who had been indoctrinated by Catholic priests and teachers—to correctly understand this fundamental text for the first time in their lives.

 

His second book, written in Italian and titled Proposizioni convenevoli e inconcusse, rejects the Christian notion of redemption through vicarious sacrifice, i.e., through the suffering of Yeshu. Montalto explains that, according to the Torah, when a person transgresses, they are personally responsible for their wrongdoing and can only be forgiven if they recognize their sin, confess it—not to a clergyperson, but directly to God—and commit to correcting their conduct. Thus, Judaism emphasizes personal responsibility for sin and Teshuba , personal and direct repentance, as the path to individual redemption.

 

Another manuscript attributed to Montalto is a pesaq halakha, an eleven-page rabbinic responsum on the topic of Shabbat rest. As a physician, Montalto sometimes treated patients on Shabbat in critical cases, traveling in a covered wagon driven by non-Jews. Someone objected to this practice before the rabbinical court of Venice. The responsum, filled with rabbinic references and written in cursive Italian-Hebrew handwriting, may have been penned by Montalto’s assistant, Rabbi Shaul Levi Mortera.

HIS GRAVE

The location of his grave appears in a painting by the artist Jacob van Ruisdael, painted between 1650 and 1655, where his white tomb stands at the center of the canvas.

The Hebrew inscription on his tombstone was likely composed by his main Torah teacher, Yehuda Aryeh de Modena:

לישראל כהריאל והר תלול הלא זה הוא

יהי זכרו ואור שחרו באמרם לו פאר דור הוא

הרק עמו שמו עמו הלא שרים יבקשו הוא

והוא להם בחצריהם בקול יקרא ואלי-יה הוא

ה”ה האלוף הקצין הרב הכולל כמוהרר אליהו מונטאלטו זצוקל

שהיה יועץ ורופא למלך ולמלכת צרפת ויצוו לחנוט אותו

ויישם בארון הזה ויתהלך את האלהים בכ’ט בשבט שנת שלום

 

The Hebrew is poetic—an artistic work worthy of the great Sephardic rabbinic composers of the time. Some elements and references I can try to decipher, include the use of the Hebrew word har (mountain), as a play on his surname “Monte Alto”; the allusion to his ties with both the poor of his people (in the Venice ghetto) and the royalty, demonstrating his profound humility; the mention that his body was embalmed for transport from Tours to Amsterdam (Ya’akov); the textual reference to the burial of Yosef (and Yaakov); and finally, the phrase that he “walked with God,” echoing God’s commandment to Abraham Abinu.