LETTER of RABBI AVRAHAM NISSANIAN

בהנ”ו ערב פורים ה’תשע”א
Erev Purim 5771
Dear member of the Community,
I hope this letter finds you excitedly anticipating the wonderful holiday of Purim. Rejoicing the miracle of Purim is certainly a most enjoyable time for our community. It is a time for families to get together to celebrate Hashem’s delivering us from the danger of Haman’s decree to the safety of Mordechai and Esther’s rule.
Regrettably, the Orthodox community often experiences misfortune as a result of an accident related to excessive drinking. All doctors agree that  disproportionate drinking and the subsequent drunken state that ensues pose very serious health risks for the inebriated as well as those around them.
While Purim  Simchah is not only appropriate, but in fact mandated, the kind of reckless drinking that takes place in many circles is extremely hazardous, not in the spirit of Yahaduth, and, according to most halachic opinions, against halachah. 
The later Poskim were in the position to weigh all the earlier opinions, and we are to follow their Psak, which is essentially in the Shulchan Aruch.
The Bet Yosef quotes Orchot Chaim: “The mitzvah to drink on Purim does not mean to get drunk, because being drunk is a total Issur, and there is no Averah greater than this!”
Hagaon Harav Shmuel Kamentzky made the bold statement that “Getting drunk on Purim is an Averah, not a Mitzvah.”
The Ramah says in regard to the Mitzvah to drink on Purim, that one need not get drunk, but to drink just a bit more than one usually does, and take a nap.
The Mishnah Berurah (695) says “This is the proper thing to do.”
Getting drunk is improper. That is the halachah. 
In today’s climate, where youngsters have increased access to all types of excesses, having too many drinks on Purim can lead to future problems. Many teens who have fallen away from a stable life situation point to a drink at a “Kiddush Club”, a drink on Purim, or a smoke at a  Purim party as the starting point for their addiction. Unfortunately,  children attending Purim celebrations at many public places have reported that these events encourage youngsters to drink irresponsibly and to participate in other excessive behaviors such as drugs or cigarette smoking.
I am therefore asking our entire community to join together and carefully monitor the consumption of alcohol over Purim. It is important as well to know where and with whom our  children will be throughout the holiday. Please  let’s  talk  to our children about the dangers of drinking, and the need to insist on a designated driver if others around them are drinking.
This way, we can ensure that we all experience a truly joyous and safe Purim only filled with Orah, Simchah, Sasson, V’ykar.
Sincerely,

Rabbi Avraham Nissanian
Congregation Shaare Tova
Eshel Avraham Organization
www.EshelAvraham.com




Jewish Bioethics: Prenatal genetic screening (4 of 4)

Can a Jewish mother undergo during her pregnancy prenatal screening tests. In other words, all those routine tests aimed to detect certain genetic conditions or birth defects in her baby(chas veshalom)?
The answer to this question relates directly with the differences of opinion among the rabbis on the status of abortion (see here) and the timeline when abortion will be authorized or not according to the different opinions (see here).
Based on the opinion of the former Chief rabbi of Israel Abraham Shapira, z’l, rabbi Melamed writes in penine halakha that it is preferable for a pregnant woman to perform all the prenatal screening she is asked by her doctor. Based on the results, if necessary, she would consult with a rabbinical authority how to proceed further. The expert rabbi will base his ruling considering all the pieces of the puzzle: the severity of the detected disease, the month or week during pregnancy when the disease is found, the mother’s general heath, etc. Therefore, the more information he is provided, the more well-founded his verdict will be.    Even the mental health of the mother is a point of consideration for the rabbi. Consider this controversy among two contemporary rabbis:  Rabbi Lebushe Mordekhai thinks that the possibility of a mental disorders in the mother of an unhealthy child tantamount being her life in danger. While rabbi Nishmat Abraham disagrees and said that today’s psychiatric medication helps the mother to cope with the risks of depression. As the reader can see, this is a very sensitive area and the opinions of the abbis differ, sometimes from one extreme to the other (seehere why). 
  
The information coming from prenatal screening is important even for those whose opinion is against interrupting pregnancy. Because there is a significant psychological value for the parents preparing themselves for the conditions they will find.  
  
  
IN THIS PARTICULAR AND DELICATE SUBJECT, I MUST ASK THE READER TO CONSIDER THE PROVIDED INFORMATION EXCLUSIVELY AS EDUCATIONAL MATERIAL. IF chas veshalom A DECISION NEEDS TO BE MADE, THE COUPLE SHOULD CONSULT WITH THEIR RABBI.  
  



Rabbi Yehuda Bibas vs. the reform movement (1776-1852)

 

Previously (see here) we mentioned that Rabbi Yehuda Bibas served as the Rabbi of the Island of Corfu (today, Greece) from 1831 to 1850. Rabbi Bibas’ activity and vision was not limited to the Jews of Corfu.  He traveled through Europe and North Africa visiting Turkey, the Balkans, Vienna, London, Germany, Hungary and Prague and many more Jewish communities.
The main message that he preached to all Jews was TESHUBA.  He expanded the meaning of teshuba (literally: “return”) from the conventional meaning of returning to God to the idea of a teshuba kelalit or political teshuba: the return of the Jews to the land of israel.  
By living in the Diaspora he said:
 
“We are giving our back to God, as our rabbis explained: A Jew that lives outside Israel is like a Jew without a God. And why we are living in the exile, going from city to city to look for our livelihood? Didn’t the Tora say that Israel is a land that HaShem constantly oversees? A land in which you will not eat bread in poverty? Isn’t it a land that lacks nothing? Every time we eat we give thanks to God for the good land that He granted us”
Rabbi Bibas message of teshuba as active return to Zion made a powerful impact against the background of the Reform movement, very popular in those years. The reformers wished to introduce changes in the prayers, organs and music in Shabbat  services, etc. but mainly they aimed to erase the memory of Zion, Jerusalem  and Israel. The most important goal of the reform movement was to assert that Judaism is a religion without any national element.  A Jew should have exclusive allegiance to Germany, for example, and not aspiring or praying to eventually going back to Israel.
“In conformity with these views, the Frankfort Rabbinical Conference of 1845 voted that all petitions for the return to the land of our fathers, and for the restoration of a Jewish state, and a Messiah that will take the Jews to Palestine, should be eliminated from the prayers books.” 
(To be continued…)
READ here “British Academic freedom?”by Chief Rabbi Sir Jonathan Sacks



PRINCIPLE 6: The prophets of Israel were true (1 of 3)

 

The Prophets of Israel were exceptional human beings, called by God to rebuke the Jewish people. In order to be credible preachers, the Prophets had to be role models individuals, possessing an extremely refined character.
Maimonides explains that not every person could become a prophet. There were three key character-traits which were a prerequisite to become a candidate to prophecy and eventually, if God’s so wished, to be called by Him (=prophecy).
An individual had to be strong, wealthy and wise.
“Strong” is a person with the ability to control himself, his body, his appetites and the words he utters form his mouth. The highest level of strength is achieved when an individual is also able to control his emotions and thoughts.  ‘Strength’ is not measured by the ability to control other people, but by the ability to overcome our own impulses and appetites.
“Wealthy” is the one who is content with his material possessions, whatever they are. He does not need more and he is not greedy to have more than what he possesses. In Judaism, wealth is not about quantity but appreciation. One person could be wealthy with 100 dollars, while other person could be considered poor even if he has 1 billion . Richness is not measured by what one has but by what one needs. The correct formula is not: the more you have the richer you are, but the less you need (regardless of how much or little you have) the richer you are.
“Wise”, is not the person who knows everything, for that is impossible, but the one that is constantly growing in his or her thirst to know and learn. Usually, we think we know something, but as our life’s experience become richer, we get to new levels of understanding on the matters we thought we know. Jewish wisdom is the opposite of intellectual stagnation.
(To be continued…)



Religious integrity: The honest seller.

Question: A car seller agreed over the phone to sell to Mr. A a car for 5000 dollars. Mr. A will come to buy the car in the afternoon. At noon Mr. B comes and offers 6000 dollars for the car. Can the seller sell the car to Mr. B since no papers were signed with Mr. A?
  
According to Jewish Law, the seller has to sell the car for Mr. A because he has already given his word, and a Jew is committed to keep his word.  However, if the seller sells the car to Mr. B, Mr. A cannot formally sue the seller. In other words, a rabbinical court will not be able to demand the seller to act upon his word. In Jewish Law for a transaction to be legally binding, there must be some formal act called qinyan (a legal act of acquisition) between the seller and the buyer. The qinyan  might be performed in different ways, for example, a written commitment.   
Our rabbis explain, however, that even is the seller cannot be sued, this seller is now considered by the Tora mechusar amana: a person who lacks credibility, i.e., a dishonest businessman. 
What if other factors are part of the equation, for example, if at noon the prices of the car changed? According to some rabbis the seller still has to keep his word and sell the car to Mr. A at the agreed price (Rambam, Shulchan ‘arukh). Other rabbis hold that in those circumstances the seller might rightfully withhold the sell (Rosh, Rama). 
Only, when there was no clear commitment between the seller and the buyer, for example, if Mr. A said: “I will try to come this afternoon…”, or if Mr. A did not arrive at the time he promised, then all agree that the seller can rightfully sell the car to Mr. B.   
(Adapted from penine halakha, liqutim, 49-50)


Mr. Aaron Feuersteinan extraordinary example of RELIGIOUS INTEGRITY and KIDDUSH HASHEM. 
WATCH THIS VIDEO CLIP and judge by yourself (by CBS, 60 minutes). 



Jewish Bioethics: Abortion and congenital diseases (3 of 4)

Previously (see here) we explained that the modern rabbis have very different opinions on the issue of abortion, when facing a congenital disease. We presented three main schools and we also warned the readers that this information should be used just as educational material. If chas veshsalom a couple faces such a situation, they have to consult with a doctor and a rabbi.  
This consultation should consist of two steps:
First, seeing a specialist physician to examine the results. If he advices interrupting the pregnancy, it is highly recommended to have a second opinion. It might happen than a doctor, because of his philosophical leniency toward abortion, would not see necessary to do more than the standard studies. It is recommended then, unless this is a doctor you know and trust, to have an independent second opinion on such delicate matter. 
Second, if the medical opinion is in favor of interrupting the pregnancy, the couple should consult with a rabbi.  There are many rabbis that are experts in this type of issues who can assess the Halakhic aspects and also the medical and psychological aspects of the situation, each of which will become a factor in his final Halakhic ruling.
Illustration: When the expert rabbi makes the decision of what rabbinical opinion to follow, even if the rabbi would be inclined to follow the stricter opinion which compares abortion to murder, he might consider other extenuating circumstances. For example, the impact on the mental health of the mother, etc. This consideration will affect the rabbi’s final ruling.  
Also, and primarily, the expert rabbi knows if the detected disease is a mortal disease, like Tay- Sachs or a different congenital disorder, like Down Syndrome, etc. and he will rule accordingly. 
Most times, an expert rabbi will meet with the couple’s doctor to see all the angles before he arrives to his Halakhic ruling. 
  
(Adapted from Penine Halakha liqutim, B, 264-265).
  
Next week, BH, we will deal with the subject of genetic testing.  
  
Shabbat Shalom!



The 13 principles of Judaism: #5. Praying to God, the right way (2 of 2)

 

Previously, we’ve explained that we should pray exclusively and directly to God (see here ) and communicate with Him only by means of prayer. Sometimes, in their desperation to have their prayers answered, people would use tricks, amulets or formulas which, they think, will help to fulfill their needs and desires. The Tora, however, is not a book of magic written to teach us how to make God do what we want.  The ultimate objective of prayer is not forcing God to accept our will, but training us to accept His.
What is the proper way to pray to haShem?
I’m quoting the invaluable words of rabbi Hayim Pereira-Mendes on prayer:
 “Prayer means speaking to God. It may be Praise, Supplication or Thanksgiving. We should speak to God about what is most in our hearts, as a child speaks to its father. That is true prayer. We should place before God all our private wants, our sorrows and our perplexities. Nothing that troubles us in our daily lives is so unimportant that we need hesitate to speak to God about it in prayer.”
“Prayer is of little use unless we are conscious of what we say and feel that we are actually speaking to God. After true prayer we feel that we have been near to God. The object of prayer is to bring us near to God.” 
“Prayer without proper conduct is worse than useless. It is an insult to God. Our prophets condemn prayer, sacrifices, the observance of Sabbath and other Holy Days, and all religious ceremonies, unless our conduct is acceptable to God. Right conduct is everything. Religious forms without right conduct are useless. Unless prayer, Sabbath, Holy Days and all religious ceremonies or forms build up right character, they fail in their purpose.  We cannot expect that God will answer our prayers, unless we “do justly, love kindness and walk modestly before Him.”
 
 
Not everything is lost in Great Britain  WATCH  Douglas Murray discussing Israel and Iran



RELIGIOUS INTEGRITY: The Honest YES

In the Tora it is written: (vayiqra 19:36) “You shall have just balances, just weights, a just epha, and a just hin; I am the LORD your God, who brought you out from the land of Egypt.”  Ephaand hin are Biblical units of measurements (like pounds or ounces today).  The Tora instructs the seller to keep the scales balanced (=just) and well adjusted, so there is no dishonesty in trade and business transactions. If you sell tomatoes you need to maintain the scale clean and well adjusted. Otherwise, even that little dirt on the scale will affect the final weight, and the buyer will get less tomatoes than what he paid for.  
Our rabbi extended the scope of this pasuq and explained that the word ‘hin’ a liquid measure unit, is similar to ‘hen’ which in ancient Aramaic means YES. They explained that in the same way our scales need to be just, our words need to be just. When the seller is going to say YES, it has to be a just and honest YES.   
Illustration: If I sell cars and a client says that he wants the car at the end of this month, and I know that I will not get the car at the end of the month, I must tell the truth to my customer.  Even when I know that by saying NO he will go somewhere else to buy his car, and I will lose the sell. If I lie to my customer and I pronounce the dishonest YES, I will be transgressing the Mitzva of HIN TZEDEQ:  Keeping a right YES, and a right NO. 
  
Rabbi Eliezer Pappo in his book Pele Yo’etz assures us that although in the short term the seller might lose a good deal, in the long term, the right YES and the right NO is the smartest business decision. Because, he explains, there is no better advertisement for a seller than the fame of a good name and honesty. 


It’s Your World  Taking responsibility for the environment, a message for tu bishbat, by aish.com



Abortion and congenital diseases (3 of 5)

As we previously explained (see here) the fact that a case is not dealt with in Talmudic and early Rabbinic sources, virtually warrants a lack of consensus among modern rabbis.  
Contemporary Rabbis differ in their views on to the classification of abortion as murder, mutilation, etc.  (see here) and those views will determine their opinion in cases where a congenital disorder was detected and the parents are faced with the decision of interrupting the pregnancy. We are talking about diseases such as Tay-Sachs, Down syndrome and others .   Today, we will see that the opinion of the rabbis will also depend on the stage of the pregnancy.  The more advanced the pregnancy the more the rabbis will be inclined to forbid the interruption of the pregnancy, even if a congenital disorder is found. 
I will present today three main opinions on this subject. 
For the first opinion, during the first forty days we are not dealing with a fetus but with an embryo (no facial features, no capability of motion, etc). Accordingly, abortion will not be prohibited within the first forty days if a congenital disease is detected, (Rabbi M. Feinstein).
  
For the second opinion the boundary is the end of the third month, when pregnancy begins to be visible. Before that the fetus is still viewed as an integral part of its mother’s body. According to this opinion, if a congenital disease is detected during the first three months, it will be permitted to interrupt pregnancy (Rabbi O. Yosef). 
  
For a third opinion the deadline is the seventh month. For this view, the determining factor is not the process of the embryo becoming a fetus or its visible presence. Rather, the determining factor is the fetus vital dependence on its mother.  Since normally only after seven months of pregnancy the fetus might live outside its mother body, before the seventh month, it is still considered as  part of its mother. In these extreme circumstances therefore, interrupting the pregnancy will be permitted  (Rabbi E. Waldenberg). After the seventh month, abortion will be authorized only if giving birth will endanger the life of the mother. 
  
(See  Penine Halakha  liqutim B, 258-259)   
  

IN THIS PARTICULAR AND DELICATE SUBJECT, I MUST ASK THE READER TO CONSIDER THIS INFORMATION EXCLUSIVELY AS EDUCATIONAL MATERIAL. IF chas veshalom A DECISION NEEDS TO BE MADE, THE COUPLE SHOULD CONSULT WITH THEIR RABBI.  

Shabbat Shalom!
Candle lighting in NYC: 4:57
Shabbat ends in NYC: 6:06
  
TWO VERSIONS OF LEKHA DODI

Lekha Dodi, by Rabbi Shlomo Carlebach    

Sephardic melody 



Rabbi Yehuda Bibas (1776-1852)

Today, I would like to start writing about one of the most prominent Sephardic rabbis of modern Jewish history, Rabbi Yehuda Bibas. His thoughts and ideas have strongly influenced the history of the nation of Israel in ways that affects us today and hopefully for ever.  The irony is that so little (virtually nothing) has been written about him.  Barely, a few lines in the Jewish encyclopedias.  Even his last name was not properly recorded. One can find Bivas, Bibas, Vivas and even Vidas. Such the fate of many (too many…) Sephardic rabbis from the last five centuries who did so much for Am Israel and were unjustly forgotten by all of us.
The information I got is from a rare book in Spanish  (“Mi padre: David Elnecave”,  written in 1985 by one of his descendants: Señor Nissim Elnecave (1910-1986).  Recently, an article about Rabbi Bibas appeared in the Hebrew version of Wikipedia. In the English Wikipedia there is still nothing.
I got all this information thanks to my friend Rabbi Nissim Elnecave from Miqdash Eliyahu, Brooklyn, who is very knowledgeable in the history of Sephardic Jews.
Today I will share with the readers only part of his biography, and hopefully in the coming weeks we will get more familiar with his creative ideas and his contributions to Am Israel.
Rabbi Yehuda Bibas was born in Gibraltar (G.B.). From his mother side, he was the grandson of the famous Moroccan rabbi Chayim ben Attar, the Or-haChayim-haQadosh (1696-1743). From his father side they belonged to the Moroccan Jewish community of Tetuán, Spanish Morocco.  Rabbi Bibas study as a child in Gibraltar an after the death of his father he moved to Livorno (Italy) to live with his grandfather. Livorno had a very prestigious and educated jewish community. Rabbi Bibas received in Livorno most of his Jewish and secular education, including his title as a physician. He then returned to Gibraltar where he established himself as the Rosh Yeshiba. To his Yeshiba attended students from England, Italy and North Africa. In 1810  he came to London, where he met  with the famous Jewish activist and philanthropist Sir Moises Montefiori (Livorno 1784- London 1885).  By now, the reader understand that rabbi Yehuda Bibas spoke perfectly English, Italian, Spanish and Hebrew, and he was a rabbi and a Physician.   In 1831 rabbi Bibas was appointed as the Chief rabbi of the Corfu Island (today belongs to Greece). Corfu had a very heterogenous and prosperous Jewish community, among them the ‘Corfiot Italians’, Jews from Venice that found refuge in that beautiful Island.
To be continued….
(If any of the readers has more information or a picture about Rabbi Yehuda Bibas, they are welcome to email me at : rabbibitton@yahoo.com
The Jewish community of Corfu and the Shoa
“When Italy surrendered to the Allies, the island was occupied by the Germans on September 27, 1943. After a period of deceptive calm, on June 8, 1944, an ordinance was passed, according to which all the Jews were to remain in their homes. About two hundred Jews succeeded to flee. On the dawn of the following day, the Germans arrested all the others and deported them to Auschwitz via Athens. The Nazis and the mob looted their homes and shops. Out of 1900 Jews of Corfu, about 180 survived the Holocaust. Many of them emigrated to Israel or settled in big cities. In 1946 the Community had 140 members; the Synagogue and the school were almost ruined. As time passed the Community re-formed and resumed normal life. Today it is composed of 65 members who continue their course.”
Read more about the Jews of Corfu here
Previously we explained (see here) that Rabbi Yehuda Bibas served as the chief rabbi of the island of Corfu (today’s Greece) from the year 1831 to 1850. The influence of rabbi Bibas, however, was not restricted just to his own communjty. During those years he traveled to numerous Jewish communities in Europe and North Africa with a clear message: We, Jews, must come back to Zion.
But why now?
Rabbi Bibas saw a rare window of opportunity for the Jewish people in the fact that many countries in those days revolted against the ruling empires and achieved their independence. Living in Corfu, gave him the privileged perspective of being a direct witness of the Greek revolution against the Ottoman Empire between 1821 and 1832, and the ensuing Greek victory which lead to their independence.  Israel, called Palestine in those days, was also under the ruling of the Ottoman Empire. Rabbi Bibas estimated that the Jews were capable then to obtain their own independence, since the Ottoman Empire was weaker and in a process an inevitable decline. According to rabbi Yehuda Bibas:“The jews must conquer militarily the land of Israel from the Turks in the same way the Greeks conquered their own land from the Turks.” 
As we explained last week, Rabbi Bibas argued that the concept of teshuba needed to be understood then also as a call for returning to Israel. If you analyze carefully the book of Debarim Chapter 30:1-11 you will find that teshuba, mentioned there eight times, appears as the idea of national reconciliation with HaShem. Same as exile in the previous persahiot was the outcome of national abandonment of HaShem, coming back to Israel is seen as the peak of reconciliation between Am Israel and our God.
Rabbi Bibas had practical plans and ideas to inspire the Jews to come to Zion. His plan, which we will explain in more detail B’H next week, might be summarized with one single word: “education”.
Previously (see here) we mentioned that Rabbi Yehuda Bibas served as the Rabbi of the Island of Corfu (today, Greece) from 1831 to 1850. Rabbi Bibas’ activity and vision was not limited to the Jews of Corfu.  He traveled through Europe and North Africa visiting Turkey, the Balkans, Vienna, London, Germany, Hungary and Prague and many more Jewish communities.
The main message that he preached to all Jews was TESHUBA.  He expanded the meaning of teshuba (literally: “return”) from the conventional meaning of returning to God to the idea of a teshuba kelalit or political teshuba: the return of the Jews to the land of israel.
By living in the Diaspora he said:
 
“We are giving our back to God, as our rabbis explained: A Jew that lives outside Israel is like a Jew without a God. And why we are living in the exile, going from city to city to look for our livelihood? Didn’t the Tora say that Israel is a land that HaShem constantly oversees? A land in which you will not eat bread in poverty? Isn’t it a land that lacks nothing? Every time we eat we give thanks to God for the good land that He granted us”
Rabbi Bibas message of teshuba as active return to Zion made a powerful impact against the background of the Reform movement, very popular in those years. The reformers wished to introduce changes in the prayers, organs and music in Shabbat  services, etc. but mainly they aimed to erase the memory of Zion, Jerusalem  and Israel. The most important goal of the reform movement was to assert that Judaism is a religion without any national element.  A Jew should have exclusive allegiance to Germany, for example, and not aspiring or praying to eventually going back to Israel.
“In conformity with these views, the Frankfort Rabbinical Conference of 1845 voted that all petitions for the return to the land of our fathers, and for the restoration of a Jewish state, and a Messiah that will take the Jews to Palestine, should be eliminated from the prayers books.”