PESAH: Why Matsa?

 

We explained yesterday that one of the three positive Biblical Mitsvot of Pesah is eating Matsa.  Now, why do we eat Matsa? There are at least two reasons. One, is explicitly mentioned  in the Tora and the second, less known, is mentioned at the very beginning of the Hagada.  Let us begin from the second reason.
For many, many years when we were slaves in Egypt, every single day we ate exclusively Matsa. We ate Matsa for breakfast, for lunch and for dinner. Matsa was the food conceived by the cruel Egyptians as the ideal meal for the Jewish slaves. First, because the Matsa lasted longer than regular bread in the slave’s stomach. And mainly because Matsa was cheaper than any other food. All you need to make Matsa is flour and water. Matsa was cost-effective also because you don’t “waste” any time. To make regular bread you need to let the dough rest for approximately 15-20 minutes and only then you would place the spongy-dough into the oven. In the Egyptian captivity the raising of the dough was skipped. Instead, the Jewish slaves had to put the dough into the oven flat because they had to work for the Egyptians without a pause. The Egyptians were not willing to waste 15 extra minutes of Jewish work to allow the dough to raise and made it into regular bread.
Thus, we declare at the very beginning of the Hagada pointing at the Matsa: ha lahma ‘aniya… This is “the bread of poverty that our ancestors ate in Egypt”
The Biblical text emphasizes a different reason for eating Matsa. Upon our departure from Egypt we also ate Matsa. Why? Because we did not leave Egypt progressively, during the course of a few weeks or even days. We were rescued by HaShem in a speedy operation (behipazon) which lasted just one night. (Try to visualize the mobilization of 3 million people leaving in one night!). And as much as we were eager to have our first normal meal with bread, ironically, there was no time to spend in preparing bread for the journey. Once again, but for a completely different reason, we did not have even 15 extra minutes to wait for the dough to rise. We had to leave swiftly, carrying the Matsot in our shoulders.
Only that this time the Matsa also has the taste of freedom. Now, the Matsa reminds us how quick (=miraculously) we left the house of slavery.
The Matsa, therefore, represents both, the sweet flavor of freedom and the bitterness of slavery.
By eating Matsa we celebrate our providential freedom, without forgetting our terrible suffering.



THE EIGHT MITSVOT OF PESAH

Pesah is less than a month away. The first night will be celebrated B’H Friday April 3rd, 2015.  Pesah’s laws and customs are so many and so diverse that our Rabbis indicated that thirty days before Pesah we should start reviewing the laws of Pesah. So, we are a little behind schedule…

Anyways, let us begin by reviewing the Biblical Mitsvot of Pesah.

In his introduction to Hilkhot Pesah, Maimonides describes each commandment, enumerating a total of EIGHT Biblical Mitsvot for Pesah. In this number, Maimonides excludes all the Mitsvot related to the Pesah sacrifice (qorban Pesah).

We have 3 positive commandments and 5 prohibitions in Pesah.

THE THREE POSITIVE COMMANDMENTS OF PESAH ARE

אכילת מצה 1. To eat Matsa during the first night of Pesah (in the Diaspora, it becomes automatically mandatory to eat Matsa during the first “two” nights)

2 והגדת לבנך . To tell the story of Pesah, the Hagada, to our children during the first night of Pesah (in the Diaspora,  the first “two” nights). This Mitsva includes many other Mitsvot and traditions, like drinking the four cups of wine, eating maror, etc.

3 השבתת חמץ. To dispose (=disown) of our Hamets on Pesah eve, the 14th of Nisan (Friday April 3rd) before noon.

THE FIVE PROHIBITIONS ARE

4 איסור אכילת חמץ . The prohibition of eating Hamets during Pesah

5 איסור אכילת תערובת חמץ. The prohibition of eating anything that contains Hamets during Pesah

6 בל-יראה . The prohibition of owning Hamets during Pesah

7 בל -ימצא. The prohibition of owning Hamets during Pesah.
(Mitsvot 6 and 7 are indeed identical, an exceptional case in the entire Tora!)

8 איסור אכילת חמץ ערב פסח אחר חצות היום. The prohibition of eating Hamets on Pesah eve (Friday April 3rd), from noon time.

In the coming days B’H we will have the opportunity to define and review each one of these these eight Mitsvot.




TEHILIM # 10: Morality without God?

In this Psalms David HaMelekh touches upon a very important and relevant question, even (or specially) for today’s society. Can you be a moral man if you do not believe in God? He says that a person who does not believe in God is accountable to no one, in the moral arena, but to himself. And since it is virtually impossible to see ourselves with objectivity, for King David, a person who does not have HaShem as his King is condemned to act with no-morality. As our rabbis have said: kol derekh ish yashar beenav,”All what a person does is right in his
own eyes.” We become very poor judges when it comes to view critically our own actions. When we do not accept an objective code of right and wrong, moral reltivism is unavoidable.

At times, David haMelekh says in the opening verse of this Mizmor,  (10:1) it seems as if God “stands far off, turning away in times of distress”.  How so? When the wicked man chases the poor, and the weak is caught in the wicked man’s devices (10:3), this feeling of “I can get away with injustice”,  makes the wicked think that he succeeds because there is no God. This is considered  an offense to “heavens”, blasphemy, (10:4) behaving as if there is no Judge in heavens. For David haMelekh actions are a direct consequence of beliefs. In other words, injustice, corruption, robbery, murder, all these acts are a testimony of the perpetrator’s belief that there is no God.

The wicked is confident of his success, he says to himself (10:6) since there is no God “I will not stumble”, I will not fail. As long as my plan is a good plan and I have all angles covered, there is no external factor (=God) that would undermine my schemes.

(10:5) “His ways are uncertain in every hour”. The moral standards of the wicked are erratic. One day, if it suits to him, this act is right, and the next day, if it does not suit to him, the same act is wrong. For the righteous Jew, morality is measured by the way an act is perceived by God, as prescribed in His Tora. For the wicked is not about God’s view, but how the perpetrator “feels” about it. Something is good if it makes you feel comfortable with yourself. There is no moral GPS, but your own sense of comfortability. And as we know our mind and imagination is fantastic at finding excuses for everythig we want to do.

Therefore, David asserts, (10:7) the wicked would not hesitate to lie or swear falsely “His mouth is full of promises, his tongue is guile and deceit”. If there is no God, he is accountable to no one for his false promises.  He will always find a way to feel comfortable with what he did, justifying to himself why he had to break his promise…

The following verses describe other deplorable actions of the wicked: he ambushes, he kills, lies, he snatches the poor, consistently telling to himself: God does not exist. And even if He exists, (10:11) He is not looking. He ignores what we do. He does not get involved. He does not care!

From now on, David haMelekh turns to God and prays for justice. In times when it seems that You are standing away, I implore You HaShem: (10:12) “Rise, oh Lord, do not forget the oppressed” (10:14) It is YOU Who helps the orphan. It is YOU who would break the arm of the wicked (10:15). The world should know that YOU are indeed the King, the Supreme Judge, forever. (10:16) YOU do listen to the cry of the weak (10:17) and YOU will do justice, and let no man oppress another man in Your world (10:18).



Rabbi David ben Zimra (1479-1573) and the Ethiopian Jews

Rabbi David ben Zimra, known as the Radbaz (רדב”ז aka Ridbaz) was born in Spain in 1479. At the age of 13, when the Jews were expelled from Spain, his family moved to Israel and settled in the city of Safed (צפת). There, rabbi David learned with Rabbi Yosef Zaragosi, the Rabbinical leader of the Jewish community of Safed at the turn of the century. In 1517 he moved to Egypt where he was appointed as the Hakham Bashi, or Chief rabbi of Egypt, a position that he held for over forty years. He rejected to work for the community professionally because he feared that if his sustenance would depend on the community he would not be able to rule with objectivity. The Radbaz then dedicated himself to commerce and became a very successful merchant, dealing with wheat and leather in the international market. He amassed a great fortune, which allowed him to be financially independent form the community and even to found and support his own Yeshiba.  Some of the students of that Yeshiba were great luminaries, like rabbi Isaac Luria (the Ari haQadosh), rabbi Betsalel Ashkenazi (שיטה מקובצת), and the Radbaz’s most prominent student and spiritual heir, Rabbi Ya’aqob Castro (מהריק”ש), one of the most famous rabbis in Egypt at the time .

Upon attaining the age of 90, the Radbaz resigned the chief rabbinate in Egypt and moved to Erets israel. He settled in Safed and became an active member of the rabbinical court of rabbi Yosef Caro. The Radbaz died in Safed in 1573.  His inheritance, by his request, was distributed among the poor, making a special provision for Tora scholars.

The Radbaz wrote many books and close to 3000 rabbinical responsa (Questions and answers)

 One of his most far reaching responsa was the one that deals with the origin of the Jews of Ethiopia, which he considered as descendants of the tribe of Dan, one of the lost Ten Tribes.

For many centuries the Rabbis have heard about a tribe in Ethiopia, which claimed being of Jewish ascendant. But for the rabbis this questions was always a theoretical question, and never a practical one. In the time of the Radbaz this question became a practical matter when a group of African captives was brought to the slave market in Egypt. A woman , with her two sons, claimed that she was Jewish, from the tribe of Dan.

The Radbaz writes (She-elot Utshubot haRadbaz, 4:219): “Once there was a Cushite woman from the land of Cush, otherwise known as Habbash [=Ethiopia] who was taken prisoner along with her two sons, and she was bought by one Reuben.   We asked her what her status was, and she answered that she had been married and these were her sons by her husband, whose name was so-and-so, and this son was so-and-so. [She said that] the enemy came and killed all the people who had been in the synagogue, and the women … they took captive…”

For the purposes of this and another fascinating investigation [i.e., the origin of the Nile] the Radbaz studied the testimonies of Ethiopian scholars and he collected evidence from two Jews, one of them coming from Ethiopia, Rabbi Isaac al-Habbashi, and the second testimony from a local Egyptian merchant who had traveled to Ethiopia and met these “Jews” in their land.

The Radbaz analyzed this case from many different angles. For example, he found that these Jews did not keep some regular Mitsvot, like lighting candles before Shabbat. His argument was that the Jews from Ethiopia, they either came to their land before the rabbis issued the decree of hadalaqat nerot, or that they were descendants of the baytosim, Jews who rejected the oral tradition.

Finally, he says that the status of the Ethiopian Jews is similar to the Karaites Jews:  they should accept to follow Jewish tradition, and should come under the law of redeeming captives, (pidyon shebuim), thus, the Falash Mura should be bought from the slave market and set free.

Four hundred years after the passing of the Radbaz, and based on the Radbaz’s responsa the Falash Mura were once again considered as Jews, and brought into the State of Israel.

The rabbi who made this ruling was no other than Rabbi obadia Yosef z”l. In February 9, 1973, Rabbi Obadia, then Chef rabbi of Israel, wrote an historical responsa in which he said that “based on the Radbaz… the Ethiopian tribes Falasha or Falash Mura, should be considered Jews… they should be saved from assimilation, rescued and brought to Israel under the laws of return [an Israel law that guarantees Israeli citizenship for every Jews], they should be reeducated to follow Jewish tradition, and participate in the rebuilding of our Holy Land, thus [fulfilling the words of the prophet :] “and the sons will return to their land”.

These are the original words of the responsa of rabbi Obadia Yosef

בהסתמך על הגאון הרדב”ז בתשובה (שאלות ותשובות דברי דוד הלכות אישות סימן ח) שאלו הפלשים בלי ספק משבט דן, ורק מפני שלא היו ביניהם חכמים מבעלי הקבלה תפסו להם פשטי המקראות, ודינם כתינוק הנשבה לבין הגוים, ודינם כישראל שאנו מצווים לפדותם ולהחיותם לכן באתי למסקנה שהפלשים הם צאצאי שבטי ישראל שהדרימו לכוש…והחלטתי כי הם יהודים שחייבים להצילם מטמיעה ומהתבוללות, ולהחיש עלייתם ארצה, ולחנכם ברוח תורתנו הקדושה, ולשתפם בבניין ארצנו הקדושה ושבו בנים לגבולם

Today, in a great part thanks to the Radbaz, more than 125,000 Ethiopian Jews live in Israel.

See how Ethiopian Jews were brought to Israel in Operation Salomon, May 24th-25th, 1991

 

 




EMUNA: The name King (Melekh)

Last week we explained that God is the King/Sovereign of the world. For the people of Israel particularly this name or attribute with which we refer to God, “King” is very significant because we consider ourselves His loyal subjects, the ones who obey His mitsvot, or commandments (See below in blue).

But there is another reason why we call HaShem “King”, as I will now explain .

Our Rabbis established the recitation of Berakhot (blessings) when we eat something, or when we enjoy a pleasant scent or when one sees something special. These latter blessings are known as Birkot haReiya, the blessings recited when someone sees something that makes him happy, for example, “shehehiyanu” when seeing a friend or a loved-one we had not seen for over a month, or when seeing a special natural phenomenon, and also when we see a prominent Sage of Israel or a Monarch, a king, Jew or gentile.

The berakha we say when seeing a (gentile) King is “shenatan mekebodo lebasar vadam” “Blessed are You HaShem Who bestowed a human being a fraction of His honor”. Now, what kind of Monarch would qualify for this Berakha? What happens for example with the King of Spain and Belgium, who do not have today the supreme authority a King used to have? Will this blessing be still said for these monarchs, who have a rather symbolic and representative power? The answer is that “the blessing of the King” would be said only upon seeing a King who has jurisdiction over the lives of his subjects. A Sovereign with the authority to decree the death sentence or to pardon a citizen condemned to death. Without judging the merits of that King, it is this supreme authority, the authority over the lives of his subjects, what would define this individual as an authentic King.

Now, we can better understand what do we mean when we refer to God as KING, particularly in our Tefilot (prayers) of Rosh HaShana and Yom Kippur. When we call HaShem “King” we recognize that our lives, the continuity of our existence, is in the hands of God. In fact, every time we say “melekh” we should assume our inescapable mortality (which we usually tend to forget) and our total dependence on the kindness of HaShem, Who has the last word over the continuation or the immediate interruption of my life. This idea, far from bring us fear, should help us to better appreciate every moment of our lives.

The word Melekh, understood in this sense, is very relevant for Rosh HaShana and Yom Kippur, because that is when our lives are judged and God, the Supreme Judge and King, issues His veredict.

Rabbi Akiba formulated a liturgical combination of two words, with reference to HaShem, that manifest two opposite ends: “Abinu , Malkenu” (Our Father, our King). Abinu, as already explained, means that HaShem is our Father/Progenitor, the One who gave us our lives. While Malkenu expresses that our lives are in His hands, and that HaShem is the Supreme King with the authority and the possibility to interrupt our existence at His will. “Abinu Malkenu” reminds us that our life is a gift from God, from the beginning to the end.




Rabbi Shelomo Serilio (ca. 1485-1555) and the Talmud of Jerusalem

Rabbi Shelomo Serilio (שיריליאו או סיריליאו) was born in Spain, before the expulsion of 1492.  From Spain, rabbi Serilio came to Constantinopla (today Istanbul), where he studied with rabbi Binyamin HaLevi, the author of zeqan aharon, and later on with the famous Rabbi Ya’aqob ibn Habib, the author of ‘en yaaqob (see here).  After a few years, rabbi Serilio moved to Salonica, in those days one of the most important cities in the Jewish world.

Around 1530 many Jews, and especially those who left Spain and Portugal, came to Erets Israel, fulfilling the dream of their ancestors. Among other famous rabbis who came from Salonica to Israel we can mention Rabbi Yosef caro, the author of the Shulhan ‘arukh, Rabbi Shelomo Alqabets, Rabbi Moshe MiTerani, (the Mabi”t), etc. A new Jewish settlement was established in Tsefat  (Safed) under the leadership of Rabbi Ya’aqob Berab ( see this).  Rabbi Serilio did not have any official rabbinical position in Safed, although we know of his involvement in a few debates that took place there. For example, Rabbi Serilio wanted to be lenient in the subject of “basar halaq”, by authorizing the nefiha (=inflating the animals lungs, despite it having fibers sirkhot, to declare it kosher if no perforations are found) in order to make meat more accessible, cheaper, to the Jews of Safed. In this, he was following the customs of the Jews of Salonica. Rabbi Ya’aqob Berab, however, rejected this leniency.

Rabbi Shelomo Serilio is famous for his commentary on the Talmud of Jerusalem. He was the first rabbi to write a commentary on one entire Talmudic Order (Seder Zera’im) of the Jerusalem Talmud. As we know, there are two sets of Talmud:  one written in Babylon (from 200 to 500 of the Common Era) and the other one written in Eres Israel (ca. 370 of the CE). One of the main differences between the Babylonian Talmud and the Talmud of Jerusalem is that the later deals extensively with the Mitsvot related to agriculture, also known as commandments which applied to the land of Israel (מצוות התלויות בארץ), while the Babylonian Talmud has no Gemara for these tractates. One of the  practical commandments Jews had to observe was the  Mitsva of shebi’it, the Biblical Mitsva that requires letting the land rest every seven years. Now, that the Jews were back in Israel, those Mitsvot wer again practical. And although Maimonides refer to them, the details of the practical applications of this Mitsva, required a renewed halakhic revision. One illustration: In those days, the Jews had no direct involvement in working the land. All the agriculture work was done by gentiles, who owned those lands.  Still, the question was if those fruits which were grown in the land of Israel, in the year of Shemita by non Jews, were subject to the laws of Shebi’it. Rabbi Serilio explained that they are. They would need Be’ur (=discarding those fruits, when that specific fruit cannot be found anymore in the fields) and that these fruits are exempt from terumot and ma’aserot.

Today, that BH we are again in Erets Israel, the commentaries and the halakhic rulings of rabbi Serilio on Shebi’it are an essential tool for reference and probably, one of the most authoritative Halakhic precedents for contemporary issues.

Rabbi Serilio moved to Yerushalayim around 1546. In Jerusalem he completed his commentary on Zera’im. He was among the most notorious rabbis of the city. He died in ca. 1555.

You can download here the booklet Minhague Shebi’it which contains the summary of Hilkhot Shemita in 5 pages, by Rabbi Serilio. This booklet was printed in Jerusalem, 1937, one year before the year of Shemita in Erets Israel.




MAIMONIDES and the journey into the King’s Palace

In More Nebukhim, ‘Maimonides Guide for the perplexed’ in the third section of the book, chapter 51, Maimonides talks about the way of ‘knowing’ God, finding Him, connecting to Him. Maimonides considers that seeking this type of knowledge , is our existential mission. Before he explains how to know and connect to God, he presents the following parable:

The King resides in the inner chamber of his palace.  The subjects of the King, some live in the city, the Kingdom where the palace is, and some live outside the city.

1. Those who live outside the city, outside the Kingdom, are intentionally disconnected with the King. They don’t even want to be considered subjects of any King, and have no interest in finding him or knowing more about him. They have other interests and this is why they have chosen to live outside the King’s city.

2. Of those who live inside the city, there are some who are no heading towards the King’s palace. Actually, they are confused and have lost sense of direction. So much so that they have their backs turned to the King’s palace and they are facing the opposite direction. Ironically, the more they search for the King,  (and they do think that they are searching for the King), the further away they get from his palace.

3. A third group of people are those who know of the existence of a palace and although they have a basic idea of where the palace is, they have never seen it yet. Still, they are searching for the paths that lead to it.

4. Then, there are those who have found the palace and have a great desire to enter into the palace and meet the King. They have gone back and forth around the walls of the palace but they have not found the entrance door yet.

5. There are subjects who have entered the palace, but they have not found the inner chamber where the King sits at His throne. They wander in the palace’s hallways, looking for signs of the King’s chamber.

6. And finally, there are those who are inside the palace, and know where the inner chamber is. They have seen the light of the King’s chamber, filtering through the threshold of its door.

In this beautiful parable the King is obviously haShem.  The first category of subjects refers to those who live outside the city. For Maimonides, these are the people who have no interest in knowing God: either because they consider themselves agnostics or atheists, or mainly because they are pursuing other objectives in life, generally speaking, material objectives or physical pleasures. In their minds, looking for a King/God will distract their efforts and will get them further away from material goods and pleasures.

(To be continued...).



EMUNA, the name Abinu, our father (Part 3)

Previously, we explained that one of the names by which we refer to HaShem is ABINU, our father. We said that this particular way to call HaShem remind us that He is “our Father” in the sense of “our Creator”, He is the one Who gave us our lives.   We also explained that Abraham discovered (or uncovered) another layer of this word “ABINU”: That God loves us as a parent love his or her children. He is interested in our well being. He cares about us.

Visualizing HaShem as a loving parent is also useful to understand what the Tora is in this context. The rabbis have always indicated the connection between HaShem’s love and the fact that he gave us the Tora, for example, in the two Blessings that we say before the Shema, every morning and every evening.

Let us see this in the berakha “Ahabat Olam”, which we say in the mornings

AHABAT OLAM AHABTANU…
“You love us with an eternal love”, this means that God’s love for us is not conditional. That, like a loving parent, even when we misbehave, and even when we are punished for our misbehavior, HaShem still loves us. He might be “angry” at us, but His love for us is eternal, i.e., like a parent, He will never reject us.

VATELAMEDEMO HUQE HAYIM…
” You taught [our ancestors] the laws of life, so they will do Your will wholeheartedly”. Aristotle used to say abut his god that he created the world but abandoned it. Aristotle meant to say that his god behaved with cruelty, because he left his creatures without any direction, or indication of what to do, what is right in his eyes or for what purpose he created humans. Our berakha expresses that HaShem gave us “the laws of life”, the Tora contains all the indications we need to live a life according to His will. Thanks to the Tora we know what God wants from us, and what our purpose in this world is. We Jews regard the giving of the Tora as an act of love, the biggest gift we got from HaShem.

VETEN BELIBBENU BINA…
Now, after we acknowledge that HaShem gave us His Tora, we ask Him to grant us the necessary intellectual tools to study His Tora. “Grant us in our hearts [=minds] intelligence, to discern, to comprehend, to understand, to learn and to teach, to keep and to perform all Your commandments with love”. In the same way You love us, we are eager to love You. You love us Your children, we love You as our Father.  We declare that our ultimate is to get closer to You, by knowing and living by Your will. We understand that You gave us the Tora, because the role of a parent does not end when he brings a child to this world. A parent must educate his children. He must show them the way to live life, and do the right thing. The giving of the Tora (described in detail in this week’s Parasha) is a “paternal” act of love.

 




Visiting the Kotel

Immediately after the Temple was destroyed the rabbis established a number of traditions that should be kept year round to remember that our Temple is still in ruins. (See HERE)

 On of those customs is that when we visit and see one of the ruins of the Biblical Jerusalem, we should say a special Psalm (Tehilim 79), which talks about destruction and desolation, recite a blessing that is usually said when a close relative passes away: Barukh…Dayan haEmet, and tear our shirt apart, again, as a mourner would do when mourning for a close relative.
Contemporary rabbis discussed the application in our days of this last tradition–tearing one’s clothes apart as a sign of mourning.
Rabbi Kook z”l said that once we have the State of Israel and we govern ourselves, this tradition should not be mandatory anymore. Why? Because the ruins of Jerusalem are not considered a reason for mourning, since it is now up to us to rebuild it.  Furthermore, he said, it might be considered an expression of ungratefulness to God, that gave us back our Medinat Israel.
Rabbi Obadia Yosef and many other rabbis said that when we visit the ruins of Jerusalem we still should tear his garments when seeing the Kotel haMa’arabi, in sign of mourning for the Bet-haMikdash, until the day B’H the Bet-haMikdash would be physically rebuilt.
There is a way -also suggested by Rabbi Yosef– to avoid this debatable situation. By visiting the Western Wall, the first time, during Shabbat or Rosh Hodesh. The holiness of Shabbat and Rosh Hodesh overrides any display of mourning. So, even for the stricter opinion, we don’t have to tear our garments when we see the ruins of the Bet haMikdash on Shabbat or Rosh Hodesh. (For a full discussion of this issue see Penine Halakha, ha’am veharetz, 195-199)
 May we all see Yerushalayim and our Holy Temple rebuilt in our days!



TEHILIM # 9: Divine vs Human justice

ישבת לכסא שופט צדק

מזמור ט׳ , פסוק ה׳

El Rey David comienza este Salmo agradeciendo a HaShem por Su justicia (9:2-5) “ki ‘asita mishpati vedini”, porque, al final, mi justicia se realizará, cuando Tú te sientas en Tu trono,  Juez Supremo”
¿A qué se refiere el Rey David? ¿Qué quiere decir que la justicia se realizará cuando HaShem se siente “en Su trono, como Juez Supremo”?
El Rey David sabe muy bien que la justicia humana no siempre triunfa.  A veces hay demasiados intereses en juego, corrupción, y barreras que impiden que la verdad salga a la luz. A diferencia de la justicia Divina, la ejecución de la justicia humana no está garantizada.
Aún así David haMelej sugiere que existen al menos un par de vías, fuera de la corte,  por las cuales la justicia se manifiesta, y pide a D’s que le permita ver esa resolución de la justicia.  En primer lugar David menciona “nombre” (9:6) y “memoria” (9:7). Los malvados no siempre pagan sus crímenes con un castigo penal. Los malvados pueden ser absueltos de los peores crímenes, por ejemplo, cuando no hay suficientes pruebas para inculparlos. Pero sus nombres quedan manchados para siempre.  Y la memoria de sus crímenes no se borra fácilmente de la memoria de sus víctimas. Este castigo compensa, en parte, la lamentable ausencia de una justicia completa.
David haMelej también concibe otro tipo de justicia fuera de los tribunales humanos. Afirma (o reza para) que  (9:16) “los malvados caigan en los pozos que ellos mismos han cavado, que sus pies sean atrapadas por las redes que ellos mismos han tendido” .    “Caer en el pozo que uno mismo cavó”, significa, por ejemplo, que si yo establecí y usé para mi beneficio un sistema corrupto donde la justicia se puede comprar para hacer caer al inocente, eventualmente, alguien con más poder que yo, usará ese mismo mecanismo corrupto para condenarme a mí, aunque las evidencias legales en mi contra ya hayan desaparecido.
Y si bien el Rey David no se resigna y clama por la ejecución de la justicia en este mundo (9:20), termina afirmando que el nivel más alto (o efectivo) de la justicia es la justicia Divina. Cuando D-s “se sienta en el Trono del Juez Supremo”.Para entender la resolución de la justicia Divina debemos pensar en nuestra mortalidad y en nuestra creencia en la inmortalidad del alma (9:18).

 

Si bien el tema del  mundo por venir, la vida después de esta vida, es demasiado complejo para elaborarlo en una pocas lineas, trataremos de describir brevemente lo que sobre el mismo se deduce del pasuq (versículo) que mencionamos al principio de este Mizmor: “D’s, el Juez Supremo sentado en Su Trono”
En el mundo por venir estaré YO, es decir, mi conciencia (la conciencia de que “soy yo”) y mi memoria (la memoria de todo lo bueno o lo malo que hice en esta vida)  frente a D’s,  “el Juez Supremo sentado en Su trono de Justicia”. Cuando estamos frente a Él, se acabaron las mentiras, las falsas pistas y las cortinas de humo.  A Él no se lo puede engañar. Lo que hicimos, lo malo y lo bueno, está filmado en la “Memoria Divina”,  imposible de alterar o manipular.El “paraíso”, en este sentido, consiste en el placer que sienten los hombres y mujeres justos (tsadiqim) de estar frente al Juez Supremo con sus buenas memorias, con lo bueno que hicieron en sus vidas. El paraíso de las personas de bien es sentirse “cómodos” frente a Su Presencia (nehenim miziv hashejiná), la insuperable satisfacción de saber que el Juez Supremo aprueba (¿aplaude?) su gestion.

Y el “infierno”, en esta breve metáfora,  consiste en el insuperable dolor de quedar en evidencia frente a D’s. Cuando el malvado –la vívida memoria de sus crímenes, y la conciencia de que él es el protagonista de esos crímenes– se presenta frente al Juez Supremo, sentado en su trono de Justicia inefable. Es un infierno hecho de culpa, vergüenza y (¿eterna?) humillación.

Para el Rey David, la justicia, tarde o temprano, en este mundo o en el próximo, llegará.
 En memoria del fiscal Alberto Nisman
y de las otras 85 víctimas del atentado a la AMIA