PESAH: How to have a successful Pesah Seder?
THE MISSION
PARADIGM SHIFT
DIVIDE AND CONQUER
Ask the adults, for example, to read a paragraph in Hebrew or in English, or to explain or comment one short text of the Hagada. For those who are going to read, scan and email them their text. For those who are going to comment, encourage them to search online, for example, in the following educational websites: www.torah.org, aish.com, ou.org, for material related to the Hagada. Ask them, for example, to explain one of these concepts: “Pesah”, “matsa”, “maror”, “why we drink 4 cups”, “why we eat reclined”, “why we eat haroset”, etc.
“Fun” is good for everyone: children and adults. Ask the funniest guys of the family to play some parts of the Hagada, for example, the Ten Plagues. Have someone (a more serious guy) explaining briefly each plague while the actors play the play. One person has to play Moshe (with his head covered with a Talit) and someone else Pharaoh (use your imagination…). Alternatively, ask the oldest child, say, 10, 11, 12 years old, to organize with the other children a 5 minutes dramatization of the 10 plagues or of the 4 sons.
Do not forget: WE WANT OUR CHILDREN TO STAY AWAKE. Make it visual. Get small plastic frogs, animal masks for deber, ping pong balls for hail, black plastic eyeglasses for darkness, etc.
RECOMMENDED SOURCES
To find great educational games for the Seder check online here and here .
For Hebrew Hagadot online (hundreds of them) see here.
For the advanced students I recommended THIS old but fantastic commentary of the Hagada written by Rabbi Don Ytshaq Abarbanel (1437-1508). Do not skip the introduction where the Rabbi tells his tragic personal story.
Gabriel Sassoon, a contemporary version of Iyob (Job)
Listening to rabbi Sassoon, I felt I was listening to a Iyob of our generation. Iyob also lost it all (although the comparison might not be very fair, because, unlike the Sassoon family, the Gemara asserts that Iyob may have been a literary character, and not a historical one). Iyob lost his fortune, his health, and worst of all, he lost all his sons and daughters in one single tragedy. Iyob’s friends came to comfort him. They were good people, pious believers who tried, with the best intentions, to justify the lethal “act of nature” (a storm) which took the lives of his beloved children. “You must have sinned. God, who controls nature, would have never punished the innocent,” they said. Iyob listened to his friends, but rejected their arguments and insisted on defending his innocence. At the end of the story, God reveals Himself to Iyob in a vision from within a storm, challenging Iyob’s belief that he understood the way nature works. Nature (“Creation”) has a somewhat visible, predictable and understandable mechanism, which pales in simplicity compared to the intricacies of God’s infinite ways in His administration of justice with mankind. Iyob, speechless, finally admits the limitation of his understanding. And through this showing of the limits of Iyob’s mind, God dissuades Iyob (and the reader) from expecting to comprehend how God’s justice functions. Left with no answers, Iyob humbly accepts God’s decrees: he “surrenders” and renounces the presumptuously futile endeavor of deciphering God’s mind.
SHABBAT SHALOM
PESAJ: ¿Vender o no vender el Jamets?
PESAH: Understanding the prohibition of owning Hamets during Pesah
Mekhirat Chamets: Selling your Chamets This Coming Pesach
In our days, most communities—Ashkenazi and Sephardic—arrange a Chamets-selling system in which the community members empower the rabbi to sell their Chamets.
This procedure is a Halakhic leniency done to avoid people from keeping “expensive” Chamets at home during Pesach.
Obviously, the validity of this selling should not be questioned, since every rabbi leads his community according to what he considers best for his congregants.
Personally, I don’t sell my Chamets, and I encourage other Sephardic Jews to do the same.
Historically, Sephardic Jews did not practice the mekhirat Chamets (=selling of Chamets) procedure.
They simply got rid of their Chamets before Pesach began, fulfilling the Mitsva of tashbitu.
The only exceptional case in which Sephardic rabbis authorized selling the Chamets was the case of a food store owner. In this case, a non-Jew would make a down payment for the total of the merchandise, and from the moment he made that payment, the Chamets merchandise would belong completely to the buyer, and he would be entirely responsible for the goods if damaged, stolen, etc.
So, for example, if the goods were stolen during Pesach, the buyer would have to pay for them to the seller after Pesach.
The buyer would also rent the store where the merchandise was stored for the duration of Pesach, and he would keep the store’s keys, which granted him total and unrestricted access to the premises of the store.
The non-Jewish buyer had the right to use, consume, or even trade the Chamets merchandise during Pesach. And if he wished to, he could pay the balance and keep the merchandise for himself.
As you can see, although the clear intent was that the seller would eventually buy back the Chamets after Pesach, the selling transaction was real, legal, and binding.
The rabbis would not have accepted any phony selling transaction that did not comply with Jewish and local law, because obviously, they took very seriously the prohibition of owning Chamets during Pesach.
Except for food business owners, the Sephardic community would not sell their Chamets. What would they do with their leftover Chamets food?
-
First, before Pesach, people would buy just whatever was necessary until Pesach, avoiding having extra Chamets-food close to Pesach.
-
Second, whatever leftovers of Chamets, if in good condition, would be given to a non-Jew as charity or as a gift. If that was not possible, it would be disposed of. Disposing of Chamets leftovers the day before Pesach is a Biblical Mitsva. So this is not considered “waste” (bal tashchit).
-
If some Chamets had accidentally not been detected, then the bitul Chamets—the formula of renunciation of our ownership of any unseen Chamets in our properties—would prevent the transgression of owning Chamets during Pesach.
If one follows these simple steps, then there is no real need to “sell and buy back” any Chamets.
I would obviously encourage Sephardic Jews to preserve the ancient Minhag and not sell their Chamets, but get rid of it.
To clarify the technical problems involved in the mekhirat Chamets procedure, see below
Remember that you only have to get rid of Chamets which is a food item (for human or animal consumption).
You do not need to sell your pots and pans, or anything that might contain “invisible” Chamets (Chamets balua’). Just put those utensils away during Pesach.
Medical pills, perfumes, cosmetics, or any non-edible items can be kept, regardless of their composition.
Food items: you can keep anything as long as you make sure that it does not contain any of these five grains: wheat, barley, oats, rye, spelt. (FYI: anything that contains gluten is Chamets. Check online!)
Conclusion:
Selling or not selling your Chamets is, at the end of the day—like any other Halakhic leniency or stringency—a personal choice made in consultation with your community’s rabbi.
Those who wish to keep their valuable Chamets products (whiskey, vodka, or liquors made from grain alcohol, etc.) should arrange the selling of the Chamets through their local rabbinate and avoid online selling.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
One of the best and most informed documents to learn all the details and debates around the modern selling of Chamets is a response written by Rabbi Eliyahu Zini, a famous Sephardic rabbi who is also a professor of Mathematics at the Technion, Haifa. I first heard about this article in a lecture given on the subject of Mekhirat Chamets by H. Joseph Mosseri, נ״י (the original article cannot be found online anymore)
Rabbi Zini explains that the precedent for selling Chamets is learned from a Tosefta that says that if a Jew is on a ship, bringing with him some Chamets goods, and his ship is late and will not arrive before Pesach as planned, the Jew could give his Chamets to a non-Jew, and he is permitted to acquire the Chamets back from him after Pesach is over.
This case was considered by the rabbis an exceptional case, since this person is in the middle of the ocean and has no other resource than to sell all his merchandise.
Rabbi Zini brings many sources, especially from the time of the Geonim, which sustain the opinion that the Tosefta refers to an exceptional case. He points out, for example, that the Mishna and the Gemara discussed at length all the different ways to dispose of Chamets (burning, throwing it into the sea, feeding it to birds, etc.) and never mentioned, discussed, or conceived selling the Chamets as one of the ways of disposing of Chamets.
Moreover, following the modern way of selling the Chamets, all the rules the rabbis instituted—like bediqat Chamets or bitul Chamets—would be meaningless and unnecessary.
Following the Tosefta, Sephardic rabbis authorized a food store owner to sell his Chamets to a non-Jew, since it is an exceptional case, and even then, they authorized it under very specific conditions.
Rabbi Zini also explains that in the case of the Tosefta, there was a transference of the goods from the Jew to the non-Jew. In other words, the non-Jew takes possession of the Chamets goods (meshikha), which is an unequivocal legal act of acquisition.
Rabbi Zini brings several sources which assert that if the goods would remain in the house of the Jew, that is an unequivocal sign of ha’arama (in this case, “a bogus sale”).
This requirement—that the goods be transferred to the house of the non-Jew—is brought as a prerequisite for the valid selling of the Chamets by Terumat haDeshen, which is the source of the Bet Yosef.
Once and again, Rabbi Zini brings the Geonim and Rishonim, who, quoting the Tosefta, emphasize that the selling would be valid only if it is not a phony sale (ubalvad shelo ya’arim).
The next element which would be considered a sign of ha’arama, or a bogus transaction for most rabbis, is that the Tosefta discusses an exceptional case where a person is in the middle of the ocean, in a ship that was probably delayed for a few days and could not arrive at home before Pesach.
And, as Maimonides points out, higi’a sha’at ha’hamishit—the time for getting rid of Chamets had arrived—and this person has no other resource.
In halakhic terms, this is known as she’at hadahaq, extreme and unpredicted circumstances, the equivalent of bedi’avad.
However, when one deliberately plans to sell the Chamets every year as a way of circumventing the Mitsva of disposing of Chamets, according to Rabbi Zini, this is an unequivocal sign that the sale is insincere and therefore invalid.
Another point brought by Rabbi Zini is that, when valid and binding, this selling transaction implies that the buyer owns the Chamets and is entirely responsible for it.
The whole point of the sale is that once the non-Jew pays the down payment, the Chamets belongs to him. The balance is made into a debt (similar to a promissory note), and the fact that the buyer did not pay the balance yet does not affect his ownership of the Chamets.
In these conditions, the entire responsibility for those goods is the buyer’s.
Thus, for example, if during Pesach the whisky that I sold to the buyer and kept in my house was stolen or broken, I should not care, because the goods are under the buyer’s responsibility and therefore he will pay me back for those destroyed goods once Pesach is over.
As we know, this is not the case in practical terms with the modern selling of Chamets. Most people would definitely care that the Chamets (“their” Chamets) not be stolen or damaged, which again is a sign that they consider this Chamets their property.
The main opinion among modern Halakhic authorities who accepts as valid this selling of the Chamets was the Hatam Sofer (1762–1839). And as we said, relying just on this opinion, against the opinion of most rabbis, would be an exceptional leniency—especially for Sephardic Jews who never followed this practice.
Even among Ashkenazi rabbis, this type of sale was criticized. The champion of this cause was no other than the Gaon of Vilna (1720–1797), who considered that whoever sells his Chamets with ha’arama is violating two Biblical prohibitions (bal yera’e and bal yimatse) and failing to comply with one positive Biblical commandment (tashbitu).
PESAH: Invisible Hamets
El artículo del rab Eliyahu Zini sobre la venta del Jamets
Algunas Objeciones A La Venta Del Jamets.
En mi opinión, uno de los textos mejor documentados que nos permite comprender los detalles y el debate alrededor de la venta de Jamets que realizamos en nuestros días, es una responsa, (del latín: Respuesta) escrita por el Rab Eliyahu Zini, un rabino que es también profesor de matemáticas en el famoso Instituto Technión de Haifa. Oí por primera vez, acerca de este documento, en una conferencia que, sobre el tema de Mejirat Jametz, dio el Sr. Joseph Mosseri, en Brooklyn, NY.
El Rab Zini explica que el precedente para la venta del Jamets se aprende de la Toseftá que dice que, si un judío, se encuentra en un barco y lleva con él mercancía Jamets, en el caso que su barco se atrase y no llegue a puerto para Pesaj, como estaba planeado , el Yehudí le puede dar o vender su Jamets, a un no judío, y se le permite, al término de Pesaj, comprar nuevamente el Jamets de él .
Este caso fue considerado por los rabinos como excepcional: una persona que está en medio del océano y no tiene otro recurso más que vender toda su mercancía. Rab Zini trae muchas fuentes, especialmente del tiempo de los Gueoním, que sostienen que la Toseftá se refiere a un caso excepcional. Indica por ejemplo que la Mishná y la Guemará, desarrollan ampliamente el tema de las diferentes maneras de deshacerse del Jamets (quemarlo, echarlo al mar, alimentar con él aves, etc.) pero nunca se menciona, se discute, ni se considera el concepto de la “venta” del Jamets como una de las maneras de desechar el Jamets. Más aun, siguiendo la lógica del método condicional de venta de Jamets en nuestros días, todas las reglas que los rabinos instituyeron respecto al Jamets, como la búsqueda de Jamets y la anulación de Jamets, se vuelven insignificantes y completamente innecesarias. Siguiendo la Toseftá, los rabinos sefaradíes autorizaron la venta de Jamets a no judíos en casos excepcionales, como por ejemplo el caso de una tienda de alimentos, y solamente bajo condiciones muy estrictas, como veremos a continuación.
Por ejemplo, en el caso de la Toseftá, hubo una transferencia de la mercancía del judío al no judío. En otras palabras, el no-judío tomó posesión de los productos Jamets (משיכה).El Rab Zini cita varias fuentes que afirman que, si la mercancía permaneciera en la casa del judío, eso sería un signo inequívoco de ha’rama, o transacción ficticia. Este requerimiento, que los productos sean transferidos a la casa del no judío, se trae como prerrequisito para dar validez a la venta de Jamets por el Terumat HaDeshen, quien es la base del Beth Yosef en este tema. El Rab Zini también menciona a los Gueoním y Rishonim que mencionan la Toseftá, enfatizando que la venta de Jamets tendría validez únicamente, en caso de ser real (ובלבד שלא יערים).
El siguiente elemento que también es considerado un signo de הערמה, “ficción” (una ficción jurídica, porque la verdadera intención no es lo que indica la transacción) por la mayoría de los rabinos, es que, como ya dijimos, la Toseftá menciona un caso excepcional, dónde la persona estuvo en medio del océano, en un barco que tuvo un retraso probable de algunos días. Como indica Maimónides,הגיע השעה החמישית , el tiempo en la víspera de Pesaj llegó y esta persona no tiene otro recurso. En términos Halájicos este tipo de situaciones se conoce como: “Sheat Hadajac”, un caso extremo, que es un equivalente de:“Bedi’abad”, “si ocurrió que…”, pero, cuando uno planea deliberadamente vender su Jamets para eludir la Mitsvá de desechar el Jamets, para estos Posqim, es un signo inequívoco de que la venta no es sincera y por lo tanto carece de validez.
Otro punto que trae Rab Zini es, que una transacción de venta válida, implica que el comprador es enteramente responsable por la mercadería que compra. Es decir, una vez que el comprador no-judío paga el anticipo del valor total, el Jamets le pertenece. La diferencia de dinero queda como una deuda (imagine que A le paga a B con su tarjeta de crédito y después A le paga al banco). El hecho que el comprador no ha liquidado su deuda, no afecta su derecho y responsabilidad sobre la mercadería en cuestión. En estas condiciones, la responsabilidad total por la mercancía debería ser del comprador. Por lo tanto, si durante Pesaj, el Jamets que yo vendí al comprador y mantengo en mi casa, p.e., una botella de whisky, es robado o se quiebra, no debería importarme, ya que de ser una venta real seria responsabilidad del comprador y él debería pagarme por la mercancía destruida una vez que termine Pesaj. Como sabemos, este no es el caso en los términos prácticos de la venta de Jamets. El comprador no tiene una responsabilidad legal en la practica por los productos Jamets, lo cual representa una señal que no considera el Jamets como propio.
La principal opinión entre las autoridades halájicas que aceptan como válida una venta legal pero ficticia del Jamets es la del Jatam Sofer (1762–1839). Como dije, apoyarse en esta opinión, contra la opinión de la mayoría de los rabinos que exigen deshacerse realmente del Jamets vendiéndolo sin intención de recuperarlo , sería una lenidad excepcional, especialmente para los judíos sefaradíes que nunca adoptaron esta práctica. Aún entre los rabinos Ashkenazim este tipo de venta ficticia fue criticada. El principal portavoz de esta crítica, fue, no otro que, el Gaón de Vilna (1720–1839) que consideró que, quien vende su Jamets con הערמה, viola, dos prohibiciones bíblicas (bal yera–é, bal ymats–é) y no cumple, con el mandamiento bíblico positivo (tashbitu).
Para leer el artículo completo del Rab Zini (Hebreo), dirigirse al enlace:
Http://www.orvishua.org.il/heb/files/art/1144659147.pdf.
Agradezco la ayuda del la Sra M.A. de Panamá por la traducción de este articulo (YB).
PESAH: What is and what is not Hamets?
During Pesah we are not allowed to eat, benefit from or even posses anything Hamets. But, what exactly is Hamets? Hamets (or Chametz) is any fermented substance -solid or liquid- that comes from one of the following five grains: wheat, rye, spelt, barley and oats.
Sephardim are allowed to keep and/or use during Pesah any product which is non-edible, i.e., unfit for human or animal consumption, even if that product might contain Hamets For example: Cosmetics, glues, shampoo, deodorants, perfumes, soaps, detergents or any other cleaning products, etc. In all these cases there is neither a need to check for the absence of Hamets, nor for any kind of Kosher for Pesah certification.The consumption of medicines in the form of capsules or non-chewable pills is also allowed. Why? Because when a medicine comes in the form of a hard non-chewable pill it is considered “non-eatable Hamets” (eno ra-ui leakhilat keleb) therefore, even if it would contain a Hamets by product (which is highly unlikely, as I will explain), one can take that medicine during Pesah. However, chewable pills, syrups, powder-drinks, supplements drinks and/or any other flavored and/or chewable medicines or vitamins, should be certified Kosher for Pesah, or one should make sure that they do not contain any Hamets ingredient in their composition.Rabbi Eliezer Melamed explains that this Halakhic criteria is also followed by many Ashkenazi rabbis in Israel. He also clarifies that today, virtually all medical pills are made with potato or corn-starch and almost none with wheat-starch (among other reasons because wheat-protein, gluten, is harmful for celiac patients).
A similar criteria is followed by Rabbi Gedalia Schwartz, from the Chicago Rabbinical Council (cRc), as you can see in this letter.It is advisable then, when possible, to ask the physician to prescribe for Pesah medication in the form of non-chewable pills.
Needless to say that in case of a serious medical condition, any necessary medicine should be taken.
Food that is suitable for animal consumption is forbidden to keep during Pesah. If one has a pet, therefore, one should get pet-food that does not contain any Hamets product. Click here to read the Star K article on pet products Kasher for Pesah.
PESAH: Different types of Matsa