TESHUBA 5:3. I’m what I do in the next 5 minutes

In the third chapter of his Hilkhot Teshuba, Maimonides explains that in terms of religious behavior there are three categories of people: rasha ‘tsadiq and benoni.
The rasha ‘(the bad guy) is the individual whose balance of good and bad actions is negative. The tsadiq (righteous person) is  the one who has done more good than harm. And benoni (average) is defined by Maimonides as the person whose good and evil deeds are in a state of equilibrium (3: 1).
In a later Halacha (3: 4) Maimonides explains that this calculation of good and bad deeds is inaccessible to us. I cannot know if God considers me a righteous or an evil person. The difference between these two states is very subtle. And since this evaluation does not depend on the “quantity” of commandments that have observed, or transgressions that I have made, as if they were red and blue “dots” on a scoreboard. Actually, this calculation is only known to God. Why? Because He is the only one who knows, for example, what our true potential is. If my potential to do Mitsvot is foe example 10, because I have the means, the time, the knowledge, etc., to reach 10, but I reach only 7, I have less merit than the person whose potential is 5, because maybe he did not have the means or possibilities of reaching higher than 5, and has reached 5. Sometimes 5 is more than 7! (as in 5/5 > 7/10).
Another example: only God knows the negative psychological forces that could be influencing a person to drive him or her to do something he should not do. The more intense these forces are, the more merit that individual has when he overcomes and controls his impulses. For some people it can be very difficult to avoid a desire to steal, a person could have a natural inclination to theft, or she might have been raised to get always what she wants…  For other individuals, stealing or lying might not be a great challenge, because his nature or education dictates to behave with honesty.
In sum, the positive or negative balance of our merits is inaccessible, even to ourselves, says Maimonides. It is known only to God.
This thought leads to the next question: Since I can not know if in the eyes of God I am a good or a bad person, how do I have to see myself?
If I see myself as a righteous man, I may rely too much on my merits and remain in a state of inertia and stagnation. I have nothing to improve. In fact, I might think, I have some credit to commit some sins … At the other extreme, if I see myself as a bad guy, I might think I’m already beyond redemption (this is what the Rabbis called, ye-ush, a state of psychological abandonment) and might I believe that I have nothing left to do to save myself.
Maimonides deviates from the conventional explanation that distinguishes righteous from sinners, and as a great teacher he was, uses a principle that today we would define as “behavioral psychology”.
Maimonides concludes (3: 8) that a person should always perceived himself or herself as being in a perfect state of balance, 50/50. As if my good and my bad deeds are in a delicate balance between merits and sins. And therefore, the next action I do, will tip the balance to the positive or the negative side.
My next moral decision, to perform or not perform a Mitsva, to commit or not commit a transgression is not going to be “just” one more point in the score board. It is extremely important because my next action will tip the scale one way or the other, and it will determine if I am a good or a bad person.
The secret, according to Maimonides is to perceive ourselves always in this state of balance.: “I am what I do with my life in the next five minutes.”

 




Free Will and Evolution Theory

האדם רשותו בידו וכל מעשיו מסורים לו
Hilkhot Teshuba, 5:4
Yesterday, we explained that the difference between humans and all other living beings is “free will”. The freedom to make moral decisions, places man above nature. In Nature “determinism” rules and reigns. Man is NOT part of nature. Man is “supernatural”.
Free will, from a more philosophical angle, is evidence of “Divine Design”. In other words, a living being with freedom of choice can not be the product of an evolutionary process.
Firstly, because for the theory of evolution we are considered an integral part of nature, where everything is guided by instincts.  We are not a unique specie, which transcends nature, designed to reach the Divine. We are “monkeys, with a little bit more intelligence.”
Secondly, free will runs against the fundamental principle of the theory of evolution: the survival of the fittest. Since moral freedom of choice means that a human being can choose, for example, sacrificing his biological needs, or even his own life, for an “ideal”. This is completely contrary to the evolutionary principle of “survival”.
It is no wonder then that for Judaism free will is the human characteristic that bring us closer to God. Midrash Tanhuma  explains that “the image and likeness of God” which we humans possess is our “freedom of choice”.
Nor is it surprising that those men and women of science who are identified with atheism, would vehemently oppose the idea of free will and would try to prove that it does not exist. An American scientist Benjamin Libet conducted an experiment in 1979 to show that what determines our actions and decisions are unconscious brain processes. The phenomenon of “consciousness”, or making an independent decision, outside the dictates of the brain, is only an illusion. Thus, the less freedom of choice there is, the more animals we are, which is in line with the theory of evolution.
Probably many readers have never heard this argument in such a direct way. But if you stop to observe certain ideological debates, characteristic of our modern society, your will notice that the issue of “free will” is, in a direct or indirect way, very present in most discussions about morality. Those who do not believe in God would justify many moral (or immoral) behaviors claiming that they are innate, uncontrollable conditions. While those who believe in God, would claim that we humans possess the capacity to change, control, and modify our tendencies.
The basic question in this issue is, whether there is something more than the brain in the decision-making process. If the decision maker is the brain, then we are just intelligent animals, as evolutionists say. But if there is something beyond the brain, call it “consciousness”, then we are something other than “nature”, we are above it.
From the Jewish point of view, the brain is not the “I”. The brain is a vehicle, or perhaps the most valuable instrument, of the true “I” that is our consciousness, or in Hebrew “neshama.” The interaction between our consciousness / neshama and our brain is an issue that goes beyond what we can say in these few lines. But briefly: our brain sends signals, for example, that we are starving, but our “consciousness” has the power to make the call and decide “not to eat”, because today is Yom Kippur. Our brain can be stimulated by hormonal urges, but our consciousness has the power to control the response to such urges. The true self is not the the one that produces or sends the electrochemical signals or processes stimuli. Our “I” is the entity that despite the signals or the stimuli can say “NO”.
 MORE ON “EVOLUTION AND FREE WILL”
 
In his book “The Descent of Man” published in 1871, Darwin said that ” “it cannot be maintained that the social instincts [moral principles] are ordinarily stronger in man…  than the instincts… of self-preservation, hunger, lust, vengeance”
 
In the words of William Provine, Professor of History of Biology, Cornell University, “Naturalistic evolution has clear consequences that Charles Darwin understood perfectly… [including the idea that] human free will is nonexistent….”
 
 
In this short video clip you can watch Dr. Provine defining the implications of the modern theory of evolutionary biology (evolution)
 
If there is no God,
There is no life after this life,
There is no objective justification for ethics or morality,
Our lives do not have any transcendental meaning,
There is no free will.   
 



HILKHOT TESHUBA 5:3: Free will and human progress

Yesterday we explained that the idea of free will is, according to Maimonides, the essential foundation of the Tora and its mitzvot. We also said that what makes us different from animals, is not only our intelligence, but above all, our power to make moral decisions. In the animal world there are no “moral choices”. Just survival instincts.  See this.
Man, thus, is a privileged being, and thanks to its free will a “super-natural” creature. This ability to choose is what, according to Maimonides, brings us closer to God.
How?
Let’s deepen this concept a little further.
Maimonides (MT, Teshuba 5: 4) explains that HaShem designed us deliberately with free will: “In the same way the Creator established natural laws, for air to rise and water to descend, … and  animals to be driven by their natural instincts, so decided [the Creator] that man will have freedom of choice, and all his [moral] actions would depend on him …. “
In the natural world,  progress does not consist in a series of choices. Animals progress towards the reaching of their maximum fulfillment in an involuntary,  “automatic”, way. The only exception is man. Human beings have an enormous intellectual and spiritual potential, which’s development depends solely on the choices he or she make. If a man chose to progress, say, intellectually, he would study, learn, instruct himself. But if he wants, he can also relegate his progress and remain as ignorant as he was when he was born into this world. The realization of man’s potential  is not a involuntary, automatic, “natural” process which happens by itself. It depends exclusively on the individual. Ironically,  man is the only creature that can choose to remain less than he can be. This is the essence of “free will”.
We are in an intermediate state, as the philosophers say, between  “angels and beasts.” Thanks to our free will, we can elevate ourselves toward HaShem, or descend to an animal state. The more we exercise our free will, that is, when we learn and grow intellectually and spiritually, when we train ourselves to control our impulses, we get closer, we resemble, God,  Who is,  as we explained, the epitome of free will.
Conversely, the more we relegate our intellectual and spiritual progress, doing nothing to learn,  doing nothing to master and learn to control our urges,  we move away from God and we get closer, we resemble, animals .
In this sense Teshuba means to become conscious that we have a huge potential, and the realization of this potential depends  whether we choose to get closer to HaShem, learning and growing spiritually. The commandments of the Tora train our basic impulses . For example: Kashrut, trains us to control our urge to eat. Taharat haMishapjá, our sexual instincts.  Shabbat, the day we stop making money, teaches us to control our material ambitions. etc.  And so is the case with every Mitsva of the Tora.

 




HILKHOT TESHUBA: The difference between animals and men

In his book Mishne Tora, Hilkhot Teshuba, Maimonides presents the doctrine of “free will” (behira hofsheet), that is, the idea that a human being is free to choose his or her actions, and therefore is responsible and accountable for what he does or does not do.
The issue of free will is quite complex, and Maimonides devotes three chapters to it: Hilkhot Teshuba chapters 5, 6 and 7.
In 5:3 he says “And (free will), is a cardinal principle, and a fundamental pillar of the Tora and the commandments. As it is written: “[Now] Look, I have put before you today life and goodness, or death and evil, and you should choose life” (30:15 Debarim).
Only humans have the power to choose. In the material physical world, and even in nature, free will does not exist. Atoms can not “choose” to act differently than what they are determined to act. And living beings, all but humans, are completely conditioned to act by their survival instincts. It is true that, as Aristotle said, an animal that is both starving and thirsty, can choose whether to eat or to drink first. Animals can choose between two instincts, but no animal can make a moral choice, that is, choosing between an instinct and a value.  A starving animal can not choose “not to eat”. Animals act by instinct, and they can not control it, let alone suppress it. The verse says: “ומותר האדם מן הבהמה אין” “and the superiority of man over the animal is not”  (Kohelet 2: 3). Allegorically, some rabbis use this verse to teach us a lesson,  changing the very last word: “and the superiority of man over the animal is ‘NO’”, in other words, the difference between animals and men is human’s ability to say NO to survival instincts. Man has the “freedom” to satisfy his needs, but he also has the power to delay or even renounce to satisfy his needs. Maimonides explains 5: 1 “This is the meaning of the verse that says: ‘Man is now like one of us.” That man is super-natural., above nature. What distinguishes man from all living beings, is free will. God’s likeness in man is precisely free will, because God “all-mighty” is the epitome of free will.
This moral freedom that man possesses implies that man is responsible for what he does. A person can not justify his or her actions by saying: “I steal money because I have an uncontrollable desire to be rich”, or something like that. Granted that we humans have tendencies or temptations of all kinds, but we have the power to control them. This is free will.
If man were not morally free, it would not make sense that the Tora would command us what to do or not to do. And it would make no sense to be rewarded for what we do right or punished for what we do wrong.
And what does Teshuba, repentance, has to do with all this? Just as we are free to act, and our moral actions are not determined by our instincts, our lives are not irremediably determined by our past. God has given us the power of Teshuba. We are free to repent, which means that in the same way that our future actions are not determined by our instincts,  our past is not irreversible. And if we truly repent, we have the power to “erase” what we did wrong and start over.
As the reader can see the subject of freedom of choice is very complex and triggers plenty of questions. B’H we will devote a little more to it in the coming days.



TESHUBA and the 13 Middot. Forgive, to be forgiven

The core of the Selihot prayer is the Biblical text ‘Amonay, Amonay, E-l Rahum veHanun….”. These words are known as the 13 attributes of God’s compassion.
Maimonides explains that by attributes, we should not understand that these are qualites of HaShem, i.e.,  what God IS (which is beyond our comprehension), but rather, how HaShem operates in this world, as it appears to us.
These words were invoked by Moshe Rabbenu  at a very delicate time: when the people of Israel build and worshipped the golden calf and HaShem wanted to destroy Israel. Moshe pleaded to HaShem to forgive ‘am Israel,  and as we know, He did.
Rabbi Yohanan explained that God Almighty showed Moshe Rabbenu that by invoking these 13 principles, the transgressors will be forgiven.
The 13 principles say the following:
HASHEM – God, behaving with compassion. As opposed to            Eloqim, which alludes to God, acting with strict justice.
HASHEM – (we will explain below this repetition of God’s name)
E-L – mighty in compassion to give all creatures according to their need;
RAHUM – merciful, that humankind may not be distressed;
VEHANUN – and gracious if humankind is already in distress;
EREKH APAIM – slow to anger;
VERAB HESED – and generous in kindness;
VE-EMET– and truth;
NOTSER HESED LAALAFIM – keeping kindness for thousand generations ;
NOSE AVON – forgiving iniquity;
VAFESHA– and transgression;
VAHATAA – and sin;
VENAQE – and pardoning.
Rabbi Eliyahu da Vidas (1518-1592) writes in his book Reshit Hokhma (שער הענוה פרק א) that the expression of the Talmud “by invoking these 13 attributes, the transgressors will be forgiven” should not be understood as by reciting these 13 attributes but “by performing these 13 attributes”.  This means that when we emulate these attributes of God with our peers, we will be forgiven by God.
A few illustrations:
HASHEM, HASHEM:  The repetition of the name of God demands an explanation. Our rabbis taught that from this repetition we learn a wonderful lesson about God’s complete forgiveness: when we truly repent for our transgressions, God will forgive us completely, and will never remind us again of that sin. The repetition of God’s names teaches us thus, that He will behave with us after we repent (SECOND ‘haShem’), exactly as He behaved with us before we sinned (FIRST ‘haShem’). There is no grudge, resentment but a total and complete forgiveness.
Thus, if we want to be forgiven by God, we need to act toward others as we want God to act toward us. Namely, when we forgive others, we should delete and erased all bad feelings toward the person who offended us, and we should act toward him or her as we did before the offense.
EREKH APAYIM (Patient) HaShem waits patiently for us to repent. Instead of punishing us immediately for our sins God gives us time to repent and avoid punishment. So too, if someone wrongs us, we should give that person time to repent and make amends.
VEEMET (Truth). He keeps His promises of good even if we do not deserve that good anymore. If we promised to do a good thing for another person, we should keep our word even if that person does no longer deserves it.
NOTSER HESED LAALAFIM  (Keeps Kindness for thousand generations) If we owe a debt of gratitude to someone, we should continue to express that gratitude to that person’s descendants.
When we recite these attributes we should learn from them, not just how HaShem behaves with us, but also how HaShem expects us to behave with others



Urgent vs. Important

As we have explained yesterday, in Sephardic communities Selihot have already started. And as we will see BH in the coming days, the center of these prayers is the viduyor confession, and the recitation of the 13 attributes of Divine Forgiveness or 13 middot.
But there are also many piyutim, or religious poems in the Selihot. Poems that inspire us to return to God. The first, and one of the best known piyutim is “BEN DAM MA LEKHA NIRDAM” which I would like to explore today.
בֶּן אָדָם מַה לְּךָ נִרְדָּם
“”Son of man, why are you sleeping?! Get up and pray [to God] with supplications!
This piyut begins with an invitation to wake up. “Waking up” in two senses. On the one hand, since the Selihot are said early in the morning, this poem reinforces our commitment to sacrifice our sleep and go to the Synagogue earlier than usual.
But the deepest sense, and certainly the original meaning of this expression, is the invitation to the awakening of our conscience. Let me explain: Given the amount of material obligations we have, given the pace at which we live our crazy lives, and the great variety of distractions at our disposal, it is very possible that our consciences are “sleeping”. How can we identify the sleeping of our consciousness? Spiritual lethargy is manifested by the lack of deep thoughts. If we do not  think about God, and what He expects from us; if we do not ask ourselves why we are here in this world; if we do not reflect on the direction in which our life moves; if we do not reexamine our values and priorities, then our consciences are probably sleeping. Spiritual awakening means bringing to mind and refreshing these questions. Being “awake” means that the search for these answers becomes the purpose of our existence.
This beautiful expression in Hebrew ma lekha nirdam “why are you sleeping” is found in the book of Yona 1: 6. The captain of the ship, which is about to sink, rebukes the prophet Yona (Jonas) who was asleep, away from all worries, ignoring the dangers around him. Yona is in an “escape” mode, almost suicidal. He was literally getting away from God. Undoubtedly, these words also refer to our own existential escapism. A stage we set for ourselves to avoid the commitment involved in asking ourselves the deepest questions. We opt to “escape”, by giving ourselves material distractions which keep us away from God. The first call of the Selichot is the call to wake up and avoid escapism.
How to wake up?
קוּם קְרָא בְּתַחֲנוּנִים
Connecting with our Creator. The connection to HaShem is the beginning of the spiritual awakening.
רְחַץ וּטְהַר ואַל תְּאַחַר בְּטֶרֶם יָמִים פּוֹנִים
“Wash, purify yourself and do not procrastinate ! Do it before the days [of your life] will pass.
The next invitation this piyut is to act “NOW”. Without procrastinating. “Washing” and “purification” does not refer to physical cleanliness, but to the cleansing of the soul: that is, the absence of sins and negative thoughts that keep us away from God.  Our goal is to “cleanse”, i.e., repent for what we did wrong, get rid of red “spots” from our records; and purify our thoughts, moving away from the values of the materialistic society.
To stimulate us to correct ourselves “NOW” we must bring to mind a simple, but usually repressed, idea: our mortality. The certainty that our lives will come to an end, and the uncertainty of not knowing when that end will come ….
This reflection is inspired in the explanation of our Sages to a verse in Qohelet 9: 8 that says בכל עת יהיו בגדיך לבנים, “Let your clothes be clean at all times.” Our sages say that in this verse the garments are our actions. And we are urged to “clean up” our clothes as soon as they get dirty. In other words: we sold never delay  repentance, asking forgiveness, and repair. We must remain clean, without “spots”  permanently, since we do not  know when we will be called by the Heavenly Court.

 




MUSAR: Maimonides on Anger Management

In Hilkhot De’ot (the rules of good behavior), Chapter 1, Maimonides describes his famous theory of the “middle way”. According to Maimonides, we all have habits or behaviors, innate or acquired, which sometimes tend to be extreme. And then, Maimonides explains, our challenge is to move towards a middle ground, equidistant from both extremes, a place of balance (derekh haemtsai). In Chapter 2, two exceptions to this rule are described. Two habits in which one should not aspire to be in the center, but in the opposite extreme. One of them is anger (the other one is “pride”). Based on what the rabbis of the Mishna taught in Pirqe Abot, Maimonides explains that anger is “exceptionally bad” and therefore “it is right and proper to completely stay away from anger, taking the opposite end.”. Maimonides says that we can “never” be angry, to the point of losing our temper. We must always be in full control of our rage and never react aggressively, furious.
Maimonides recognizes that it is sometimes necessary to “pretend” anger. In his own words: “If a person feels that in order to inspire respect in his children … [or students] …. or [in the members] community, if he is a community leader … he should express his outrage to encourage them to return to the right path … [he could do that];.. but, internally, he should always stay calm. In certain circumstances, one can act like he is angry, but never really be angry. “
There are circumstances that require, for example, that we raise our voice to express our opposition to something wrong, avoid wrongdoing, rebuke our students, etc. According to Maimonides, we could then communicate our discomfort with the strength and passion necessary. On one condition: inside, we must remain calm. We can never loss our minds.
Maimonides’ words remind me of what I read about the 2004 Tsunami in the Indian Ocean, which destroyed hundreds of cities and killed more than 230,000 people. The article talked about of a group of divers who were in the sea when the ferocious tsunami unleashed. Despite the great force and fury that was taking place in the sea surface, in the ocean, there was almost no uproar. People who were diving there did not  realized that a tsunami crossed over their heads. Because under the surface, the ocean is always calm.
Anger, if necessary, should only be superficial. Faked. Controlled. In this sense, Maimonides asserts that we have to position ourselves in the extreme. We can not adopt a “middle way” between anger and calm, losing our minds just half the time. Within us, we must maintain our calm and be in control “always”. No exceptions.
Maimonides ends: “Therefore, the rabbis have told us to distance ourselves from rage [towards the opposite end], and train ourselves to never react [impulsively], even under circumstances that should arouse our anger This is the right path [concerning anger management].”

 




Rabbi Shelomo Alqabets (1500-1580), author of Lekha Dodi

Rabbi Shelomo haLevi Alqabets was born in Salonica, Greece, in the year 1500. His father was Moshe halevi Alqabets, a refugee from the expulsion of the Jews from Spain. Rabbi Shelomo studied Tora, and particularly Qabbala, under Rabbi Yosef Taitatsaq. In 1529 he married the daughter of the philanthropist Isaac Cohen. Soon after their wedding, he and his wife determined to settle in Erets Israel. In a speech that he delivered before he left the city he said that once we have the possibility of living n Israel, even if the conditions there are far from ideal, it is the duty of every Jew to return to Israel to help building the Bet haMiqdash, to study Tora and serve HaShem with passion.
In his way to Israel he stayed for two years in the city of Adrianapolis (today Edirne, in Turkey), The townsmen begged him to instruct them in his ways of serving HaShem. He refused to stay saying that only in the Holy Land one could fathom the secrets of Tora.  He agreed, however, to write for them several works while in town. One of these books was Berit HaLevi, an explanation of the Hagada of Pesah, dedicated to his disciples inAdrianapolis.
Rabbi Shlomo arrived to Safed around 1535. Rabbi Alqabets’ passion for Israel inspired many of his community members from Salonica and Adrianopolis to come with him to Israel. Among the people who came with him was his brother in law, the famous rabbi Moshe Cordobero (1522-1570). Rabbi Moshe Cordobero, was probably the most important qabbalist of his time, until the Ari haQadosh. He had a great respect and admiration for rabbi Alqabets, and even though he was married to his sister,  he always addressed him as his teacher. Rabbi Alqabets was indeed his first teacher. But over the time, Rabbi Cordobero grew immensely in his learning and fame as a qabbalist and talmudist. Rabbi Alqabets read his writings and learned from him and  addressed Rabbi Cordobero as his teacher,  a testimony to rabbi Alqabets great humility. Rabbi Alqabets and Rabbi Cordobero created a circle of pious men dedicated to study Tora and in Tsefat.
In his way to Erets Israel rabbi Alqabets met also with Rabbi Yosef Caro, who was  also on his way to Erets Israel. They became good friends and shared many years together.  It is said that it was Rabbi Alqabets who inspired Maran Rabbi Yosef Caro to establish the Tiqun Lel Shabu’ot, a long Tora study session which takes place during the entire night of Shabu’ot.
With Rabbis Alqabets and rabbi Cordobero in town, the city of Safed became the center of Qabbala. And with the presence of Rabbi Yosef Caro and his teacher, rabbi Yaaqob Berab, Safed was also the city of Halakha.
Rabbi Alqabets was a very charismatic speaker, a great teacher, and a fantastic community leader and mentor to his students. He made taqanot, internal rules, for his students. He established for example, that the students should behave with humbleness one to another.  And when a student sees one of his peers doing something wrong he should approach his friend discreetly and explain him his mistake. The one who was rebuked, should not refute or say anything in his own defense before three days have passed, so he has time to reflect dispassionately on his own actions.
BOOKS
Rabbi Alqabets wrote many books, mostly commentaries on books of the Bible and many books on Qabbala. Some of them are: Manot HaLevi, on the Book of Esther. Ayelet Ahabim, on Song of Songs. Shoresh Yishai, on the Book of Ruth. Or Tzadikim, a book of sermons
Despite the many books he wrote and the great influence he exerted on many prominent rabbis, Rabbi Alqabets is famous for his liturgical poem Lekha Dodi, an hymn sung at the inauguration of the Shabbat. Lekha Dodi was composed according to qabbalistic teachings, expressing the yearning for the final redemption. He based the theme, “Come my beloved to meet the bride” on the Talmudic description in Shabbat 119a “Rabbi Hanina robed himself and stood at sunset of Sabbath eve [and] exclaimed, ‘Come and let us go forth to welcome the queen Shabbat.’
Rabbi Shelomo Alqabets passed on in 1580 .
To download one of Rabbi Alqabets books, MANOT HALEVI, click here



The miracles I saw and lived in israel

 

A few hours ago, I returned from Israel. We had the great merit of being in Jerusalem for several weeks, celebrating the wedding of two of our dear children. Besides the great happiness that we had as parents, we also enjoyed being in our beloved land, Israel, and more specifically in Jerusalem, Yerushalayim ‘ir haQodesh.

Israel is a land of miracles. Not only miracles of the past, in the days of our Kings and Prophets. Israel is a country where you also experience miracles today .”Identifying” a miracle is not easy .. it is easier to recognize a miracle when it already happened, than while it is actually happening to you. Our Sages said that “whoever experiences a miracle, can not identify it” (אין בעל הנס מכיר בניסו). There is a psychological barrier that says, “If it is happening to me, here and now, and I see it and I live it, it cannot  be a miracle.” In the next lines we will try to overcome this barrier.

וישבתם לטח בארצכם

To begin with, the feeling of “security” that I felt in Israel, I did not feel it anywhere else in the world. Nor in the safest neighborhoods in New York, let alone in South America.

At night you can walk in the streets of Yerushalayim, and  you do not feel insecure. The opposite, the Mamila shopping center or the old train station, which now is an area of luxurious  restaurants, at 11 or 12 at night, is full of people, mostly families with their children and grandchildren, enjoying peacefully the cool summer breeze of Jerusalem.

In Jerusalem, and throughout Israel, one sees many people with guns. Probably in no city in the world you would see so many men, especially civilians, carrying weapons. And yet, I did not feel fear. On the contrary, I felt more secure.  Because I trust the hands that hold these weapons. I can not imagine not having a panic attack at the sight of armed civilians walking freely in any other country in the world …

Personally, what surprises me most, is to see during the day very young children walking by themselves, very calmly and without fear. I have often seen a 6 or 7 years old child walking, or going up or down the bus, taking care of his or her little 4 or 5 years old brother or sister. I have lived in many countries and I never saw anything like it!

The most miraculous part of all this, is that this exceptional sense of security occurs ironically in the only country in the world whose existence is openly threatened. Israel is, literally, in the center of the Middle East, in the middle of the world’s most dangerous battlefield. Where every day hundreds, or thousands, of people are brutally murdered.

This sense of security is experienced in a country where our neighbors are our enemies … I remember in my first visit to Israel, our guide pointed to a construction site where all workers were Arabs. And he said, “When it comes to Israel, if you do not believe in miracles, you are not realistic.  And here’s the proof: the same hands that want to destroy Israel, are building it”.

וקבצתי אתכם מכל העמים

And then, the most important part of Yerushalayim. The Kotel HaMa’arabí, the Western Wall. I like to  pray at the Kotel on Friday night. Why the Kotel? Our rabbis said that although we no longer have the Bet haMiqdash, the Shekhina, a miraculous reflection of the Divine presence, still resides at the Kotel. Praying at the Kotel is praying as close as possible to HaShem. The closest to His dwelling pace. Experiencing in our souls an echo of His presence.

And what is special about praying at the Kotel on Friday night? Friday night you can experience the other miraculous dimension of the Kotel, the human dimension. Let me explain: we Jews, are unfortunately very divided: religious, non-religious; Sephardim, Ashkenazim; Hasidim, Mitnagdim; army, no army; 45% of Jews live in Israel, 55% outside of Israel; There are Yemenite Jews, Ethiopian, Russian, South American; They are Americans and there are the French jews (more present than ever). We are so different from each other. And usually you see the Hassidim with the Hassidim; soldiers with other soldiers; and the French with the French. Except on a Friday night at the Western Wall.  When I finish my Tefila, I like looking at the Kotel from the balcony, and observe what is probably the biggest miracle of our times. Witness, with my privileged eyes what our prophets were able to visualize only in their most optimistic prophecies: the gathering of the exiles (qibbuts galuyot); the end of 20 centuries of separation and division that our people suffered in the diaspora. Because every Friday night at the Kotel you see literally all the people of Israel represented in this special place. All together, with one and same feeling in the heart, עם אחד בלב אחד. An incredible human rainbow where Yehudim of all colors and backgrounds pray, sing and dance “together.” And nothing and no one separates them. I know of no other place in the world, or any other time, where you can witness such a miracle. Where you can recognize this incredible miracle that easily.

May HaShem allow us to continue enjoying many years of peace, security and unity in Eretz Israel. And all of us, who are still living in our voluntary exile, may we all merit to live very soon our final redemption, בב”א

 

 




Rabbi Shemuel de Medina, head of the Yeshiba of Salonica (1505-1589)

Rabbi Shemuel ben Moshe de Medina (abbreviated רשד”ם) was a great Talmudist and the Rosh Yeshiba of the Talmudic academy of that city. His teachers were the famous rabbi Yosef Taitatsaq, who was also one of the teachers of rabbi Yosef Caro, and Rabbi Levi Ibn Habib. These two rabbis were very different in their orientation and intellectual horizons. Both were great luminaries, but while Rabbi ibn Habib was inclined to reason and Talmudic logic, rabbi Taitatsaq was more inclined to mysticism and qabbala. Rabbi Medina absorb from these two rabbis, but ironically, he did not dedicate himself nor to philosophy not to mysticism, virtually all of his teachings and writings focus on Jewish Law (Halakha).

He lived thorough many personal misfortunes. Rabbi Medina lost his father at a very young age. Then,  his two sons in law, rabbi Yosef Tsarfati and rabbi Ytshaq Hayoun, died at a young age living behind their wives, the only two daughters of rabbi Medina and numerous children. A few years later, his brother, a man of means who educated him and supported him financially, also passed away.  And the burden of the maintenance of his widowed and her children also fell upon him. Still, he did not abandon the study of Tora and continued writing and teaching. In all this time, he never wanted to be paid from the public community funds, even though he was in a great need of money. On the contrary, as a testimony of his great humbleness, he paid his communal taxes, from which he was technically exempted as a Tora scholar, to avoid presumption ( כדי לא להחזיק עצמו כתלמיד חכם) and  benefitting from his Tora.

Rabbi Medina founded a Yeshiva in Salonica in which he introduced the system of teaching of the great Spanish talmudic scholars from the time of Isaac Campanton. This Yeshiba was supported by the famous Jewish philanthropist Doña Gracia Mendes Nasí. He had many disciples, among them rabbi Abraham di Boton, author of lehem Mishne.

Rabbi Medina was the accepted Halakhic authority both in his own and in the following generations in Salonica and beyond. Numberless questions were addressed to him from all parts of the Ottoman Empire and Italy. Rabbi Ḥayim Shabbetai said of him: “He was an expert judge of encyclopedic knowledge, and one must not deviate an iota from his decisions”. The Halakhic decisions of rabbi Medina were studied an incorporated also among Eastern European Tora scholars in later generations, and his rulings are often quoted in modern times by judges in the State of Israel in support of their decisions.

Rabbi Medina was one of the leaders of the congregations coming from the “Gerush” (the expulsion from Spain and Portugal). Rabbi Medina himself was of Portuguese origin and he acted as the rabbi of the Portuguese Synagogue in Salonica. Still, when a controversy aroused on the subject of liturgy (Jewish prayers), and the congregations wanted to print their own Siddurim, rabbi Medina decided to print the version of the Spanish Jews (sefaradim), and not the Portuguese, based on the merits of that version, which was in his own words, “flawless and accessible to all”.

In one of the controversies which took place in Salonica and elsewhere, Rabbi Medina maintained the right of the wealthy members and contributors of the community to regulate the direction of communal affairs. According to him, as had been the custom in Spain, the leadership of the community should be in the hands of those who bear its financial burden, providing they were loyal to the religious principles.

He died at Salonica in 1589. His son was rabbi Moshe De Medina, who was a very important rabbi and a successful merchant and philanthropist, helped to found a new Hebrew printer where many important Tora manuscripts were published for the first time thanks to his generous efforts. Among them, of course, the book of his father Pisqe Rabbi Shemuel De Medina ( שו”ת מהרשד”ם).  This book contains a total of 956 questions and answers on all areas of Jewish law, with an introduction by his own son, Rabbi Moshe.

You can download the book of Rabbi Shemuel De Medina,  published in Luvov 1860, clicking here.